Literature DB >> 24964973

Comparison of diameter-axial-polar nephrometry and RENAL nephrometry score for treatment decision-making in patients with small renal mass.

Yoshio Naya1, Akihiro Kawauchi, Masakatu Oishi, Takashi Ueda, Atsuko Fujihara, Yasuyuki Naito, Terukazu Nakamura, Fumiya Hongo, Kazumi Kamoi, Koji Okihara, Tsuneharu Miki.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate our institution's experience in performing laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) and partial nephrectomy (PN) in patients with small renal masses.
METHODS: 142 patients with cT1aN0M0 lesions were identified. 68 of these subjects were treated with LRN and 74 were treated with laparoscopic PN (LPN). The clinicopathological characteristics of the two groups of patients, including diameter-axial-polar (DAP) nephrometry and RENAL nephrometry score (RENAL-NS), operative results, and outcomes, were retrospectively analyzed.
RESULTS: A multivariate logistic regression analysis for the selection of PN as the treatment showed that tumor size, DAP nephrometry, RENAL-NS and imperative condition were all independent factors. The area under the curve receiver operating characteristics (ROC-AUC) of DAP and RENAL-NS for performing LPN were 0.897 and 0.825, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Although LRN was performed in patients with a high nephrometry score in this study, open partial nephrectomy (OPN) should be considered for patients with a high nephrometry score in T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) because of better functional and similar oncological outcomes. Based on ROC analysis, when DAP is 6 or less, LPN should be considered and when DAP is 7 or more, OPN should be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24964973     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-014-0714-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.402


  13 in total

1.  Diameter-axial-polar nephrometry: integration and optimization of R.E.N.A.L. and centrality index scoring systems.

Authors:  Matthew N Simmons; Shahab P Hillyer; Byron H Lee; Amr F Fergany; Jihad Kaouk; Steven C Campbell
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumours: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  William C Huang; Andrew S Levey; Angel M Serio; Mark Snyder; Andrew J Vickers; Ganesh V Raj; Peter T Scardino; Paul Russo
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

Review 4.  Excise, ablate or observe: the small renal mass dilemma--a meta-analysis and review.

Authors:  David A Kunkle; Brian L Egleston; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 5.  Minimally invasive nephron-sparing surgery.

Authors:  Andre Berger; Sebastien Crouzet; David Canes; Georges-Pascal Haber; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.309

6.  The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth.

Authors:  Alexander Kutikov; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  A critical analysis of the actual role of minimally invasive surgery and active surveillance for kidney cancer.

Authors:  Roman Heuer; Inderbir S Gill; Giorgio Guazzoni; Ziya Kirkali; Michael Marberger; Jerome P Richie; Jean J M C H de la Rosette
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy in patients with small renal tumors--is there a difference in mortality and cardiovascular outcomes?

Authors:  William C Huang; Elena B Elkin; Andrew S Levey; Thomas L Jang; Paul Russo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Laparoscopic nephrectomy outcomes of elderly patients in the 21st century.

Authors:  Frank C Lai; Eric L Kau; Christopher S Ng; Gerhard J Fuchs
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Radical versus partial nephrectomy: effect on overall and noncancer mortality.

Authors:  Laurent Zini; Paul Perrotte; Umberto Capitanio; Claudio Jeldres; Shahrokh F Shariat; Elie Antebi; Fred Saad; Jean-Jacques Patard; Francesco Montorsi; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  4 in total

1.  Image-guided biopsy of small (≤4 cm) renal masses: the effect of size and anatomical location on biopsy success rate and complications.

Authors:  Matthew J Seager; Uday Patel; Christopher J Anderson; Michael Gonsalves
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  The renal tumor morphological characteristics that affect surgical planning for laparoscopic or open partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Yasuhito Funahashi; Kenta Murotani; Yasushi Yoshino; Naoto Sassa; Shohei Ishida; Momokazu Gotoh
Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.131

3.  Predicting outcomes in partial nephrectomy: is the renal score useful?

Authors:  André Costa Matos; Marcos F Dall'Oglio; José Roberto Colombo; Alexandre Crippa; João A Q Juveniz; Felipe Coelho Argolo
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

4.  Differentiating the clinical and computed tomography imaging features of mixed epithelial and stromal tumors of the kidney to establish a treatment plan.

Authors:  Juan Chen; Hui Liu; Mengsi Li; Wenguang Liu; Ismail Bilal Masokano; Yigang Pei; Wenzheng Li
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 2.102

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.