| Literature DB >> 24964404 |
Osama Shekhah1, Youssef Belmabkhout1, Zhijie Chen2, Vincent Guillerm2, Amy Cairns2, Karim Adil2, Mohamed Eddaoudi2.
Abstract
Direct air capture is regarded as a plausible alternate approach that, if economically practical, can mitigate the increaEntities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24964404 PMCID: PMC4083436 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5228
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Figure 1Pore size tuning.
Pore size tuning of the channel structures of (a) SIFSIX-2-Cu-i, (b) SIFSIX-3-Zn or/and SIFSIX-3-Cu. (a) SIFSIX-2-Cu-i; pores size 5.15 Å, Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) apparent surface area (N2 adsorption) 735 m2 g−1. (b) SIFSIX-3-Zn; pores size 3.84 Å, BET apparent surface area 250 m2 g−1 (determined from the CO2 adsorption isotherm at 298 K); SIFSIX-3-Cu; pores size 3.50 Å (NLDFT), BET and langmuir apparent surface area ca. 300 m2 g−1 (determined from the CO2 adsorption isotherm at 298 K). Colour code: Dipyridylacetylene (dpa, thick light green polygon), pyrazine (pyz, blue polygon), Zn, Cu (purple polyhedra), Si (light blue spheres), F (light green spheres). All guest molecules are omitted for clarity. Note that the grey net represents the interpenetrated net in SIFSIX-2-Cu-i.
Figure 2CO2 adsorption isotherms.
CO2 adsorption isotherms at variable temperatures for SIFSIX-3-Cu. The SIFSIX-3-Cu analogue shows asteeper variable temperature adsorption isotherms at very low pressure indicative of strong CO2-SIFSIX-3-Cu interactions. (a) pore size distribution (PSD) derived from the CO2 sorption isotherm (CO2 at 273 K NLDFT) for SIFSIX-3-Cu. The PSD extracted from adsorption isotherms, shows an average pore size for SIFSIX-3-Cu centred at 3.5 Å(b).
Figure 3CO2 volumetric uptake.
CO2 volumetric uptake for SIFSIX-3-Cu at 298 K compared with SIFSIX-3-Zn, SIFSIX-2-Cu-I and Mg-MOF-74. The adsorption results at very low pressure (400 p.p.m.-5%) for the SIFSIX-3-Cu showed that the Cu analogue exhibits steeper adsorption isotherms at very low CO2 concentration in comparison with other materials. At 7.6 torr (0.01 bar), SIFSIX-3-Cu uptakes 82.6 cm3(STP)/cm−3 versus 55 and 28 cm3(STP)/cm−3 for SIFSIX-3-Zn and Mg-MOF-74, respectively (a). Isosteric heats of adsorption at low coverage for SIFSIX-3-Cu, SIFSIX-3-Zn and SIFSIX-2-Cu-I. The Q for SIFSIX-3-Cu was observed to be higher than the Zn analogue and steady constant up to relatively higher recorded CO2 loadings. This is indicative of the presence of homogenous binding sites over the full range of CO2 loading for SIFSIX-3-Cu (b).
Figure 4Column breakthrough experiments.
Column breakthrough test of CO2/N2:1,000 p.p.m./99.9% for SIFSIX-3-Cu, SIFSIX-3-Zn in dry condition (a). Column breakthrough test of CO2/N2:1,000 p.p.m./99.9% for SIFSIX-3-Cu in dry as well as at 74% RH (b). The CO2 selectivity for SIFSIX-3-Zn and SIFSIX-3-Cu was investigated experimentally at trace CO2 using column breakthrough tests for binary CO2/N2: 1,000 p.p.m./99.9% mixture at 298 K in dry as well as in humid conditions. In dry condition, the first CO2 signal downstream the column was observed only after ca. 798 and ca. 1922, min g−1 for SIFSIX-3-Zn and SIFSIX-3-Cu, respectively, after starting continuous CO2/N2 gas mixture flux (5 cm3 min−1), while N2 breakthrough occurred immediately in few seconds.
CO2 adsorption uptake comparison.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SIFSIX-2-Cu-i | 0.0684 | 0.097 | 0.19 | 32 |
| SIFSIX-3-Zn | 0.13 | 1.12 | 1.53 | 45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Mg-MOF-74 | 0.088 | 0.7 | 1.27 | 47 |
| Mg-MOF-74-ED | 1.5 | ND | ND | ND |
| Mg-dobpdc-mmen | 2 | 2.5 | 2.75 | 70 |
| TRI-PE-MCM-41 | 1 | 1.45 | 1.6 | 92 |
| HAS | 1.7 | ND | ND | ND |
ND, non determined.
CO2 adsorption uptake at various traces of CO2 concentration and at 298 K in comparison with the most promising MOFs and other various amine-supported materials.
*mmol g−1.
†cm3 (STP)/cm3.
§Ethylenediamine functionalized28.
||Chemical adsorbent.
¶N, N-dimethylethylenediamine functionalized27.
#Amine-supported silica.
Data in bold represents the data reported for the MOF reported in this work.