Literature DB >> 24964261

Comparison of algorithms to infer genetic population structure from unlinked molecular markers.

Andrea Peña-Malavera, Cecilia Bruno, Elmer Fernandez, Monica Balzarini.   

Abstract

Identifying population genetic structure (PGS) is crucial for breeding and conservation. Several clustering algorithms are available to identify the underlying PGS to be used with genetic data of maize genotypes. In this work, six methods to identify PGS from unlinked molecular marker data were compared using simulated and experimental data consisting of multilocus-biallelic genotypes. Datasets were delineated under different biological scenarios characterized by three levels of genetic divergence among populations (low, medium, and high FST) and two numbers of sub-populations (K=3 and K=5). The relative performance of hierarchical and non-hierarchical clustering, as well as model-based clustering (STRUCTURE) and clustering from neural networks (SOM-RP-Q). We use the clustering error rate of genotypes into discrete sub-populations as comparison criterion. In scenarios with great level of divergence among genotype groups all methods performed well. With moderate level of genetic divergence (FST=0.2), the algorithms SOM-RP-Q and STRUCTURE performed better than hierarchical and non-hierarchical clustering. In all simulated scenarios with low genetic divergence and in the experimental SNP maize panel (largely unlinked), SOM-RP-Q achieved the lowest clustering error rate. The SOM algorithm used here is more effective than other evaluated methods for sparse unlinked genetic data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24964261     DOI: 10.1515/sagmb-2013-0006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol        ISSN: 1544-6115


  5 in total

1.  Genetic analysis of Indian tasar silkmoth (Antheraea mylitta) populations.

Authors:  Saikat Chakraborty; M Muthulakshmi; Deena Vardhini; P Jayaprakash; J Nagaraju; K P Arunkumar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  A transcriptomic study for identifying cardia- and non-cardia-specific gastric cancer prognostic factors using genetic algorithm-based methods.

Authors:  Junyi Xin; Yanling Wu; Xiaowei Wang; Shuwei Li; Haiyan Chu; Meilin Wang; Mulong Du; Zhengdong Zhang
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 5.310

3.  Leishmania Sexual Reproductive Strategies as Resolved through Computational Methods Designed for Aneuploid Genomes.

Authors:  Jahangheer S Shaik; Deborah E Dobson; David L Sacks; Stephen M Beverley
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 4.096

4.  A Deep Learning Approach to Population Structure Inference in Inbred Lines of Maize.

Authors:  Xaviera Alejandra López-Cortés; Felipe Matamala; Carlos Maldonado; Freddy Mora-Poblete; Carlos Alberto Scapim
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  The superior fault tolerance of artificial neural network training with a fault/noise injection-based genetic algorithm.

Authors:  Feng Su; Peijiang Yuan; Yangzhen Wang; Chen Zhang
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 14.870

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.