| Literature DB >> 24964072 |
Zhangyong Hu1, Jinliang Yang2, Yangping Wu2, Guolian Xiong3, Yali Wang3, Jun Yang3, Lan Deng3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Cytokine-inducible SRC homology 2 domain protein (CISH) is the first member of the suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS) protein family. An association between multiple CISH polymorphisms and susceptibility to infectious diseases has been reported. This study aimed to investigate the possible association of these single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in CISH gene with different outcomes of Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24964072 PMCID: PMC4071005 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100826
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Baseline characteristics of study subjects.
| HBV-resolved(n = 425) | AsC(n = 240) | CHB(n = 217) | LC(n = 137) | |
| Male | 191(44.90%) | 147(61.25%) | 148(68.20%) | 109(79.56%) |
| Female | 234(55.06%) | 93(38.75%) | 69(31.80%) | 28(20.44%) |
| age | 41.08±14.38 | 36.23±11.98 | 40.65±13.13 | 49.69±11.63 |
| HBsAg+ | 0 | 240(100.0%) | 217(100.0%) | 137(100%) |
| Anti-HBs+ | 410(96.47%) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| HBeAg+ | 0 | 56(23.33%) | 98(45.16%) | 21(15.33%) |
| Anti-HBc+ | 398(93.65%) | 138(57.50%) | 142(65.44%) | 107(78.10%) |
| ALT>40(IU/L) | 0 | 0 | 201(92.63%) | 46(33.58%) |
SNP marker information for CISH gene for all subjects studied (persistent HBV infection and HBV-resolved).
| Gene | Chr.No | SNPs | position | location | ObesHET | PredHET | HWpval | MAF | Alleles |
| rs622502 | +3415 | intron | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.33 | 0.06 | G:C | ||
| CISH | 3 | rs2239751 | +1320 | exon | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.81 | 0.39 | T:G |
| rs6768300 | −163 | promoter | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.89 | 0.06 | C:G | ||
| rs414171 | −292 | promoter | 0.48 | 0.49 | 0.50 | 0.44 | T:A |
CISH genotype and allelic frequencies for association with persistent HBV infection in Chinese Han population.
| SNPs | Case (n = 594) | Control(n = 425) | OR(95%CI) | x2 | adjusted p value |
| rs2239751 | |||||
| GG | 78 (13.13%) | 75 (17.65%) | 1 | 6.01 | 0.05 |
| GT | 277 (46.63%) | 201 (47.29%) | 1.39 (0.95–2.02) | 2.92 | 0.09 |
| TT | 239 (40.24%) | 149 (35.06%) | 1.63(1.10–2.39) | 5.99 | 0.01 |
| G | 433(36.45%) | 351(41.29%) | 1 | ||
| T | 755(63.55%) | 499(58.70%) | 1.23(1.02–1.47) | 4.92 | 0.03 |
| rs414171 | |||||
| AA | 107(18.01%) | 101(23.76%) | 1 | 8.40 | 0.02 |
| TA | 283(47.64%) | 204(48.00%) | 1.39(0.99–1.99) | 3.67 | 0.06 |
| TT | 204(34.34%) | 120(28.24%) | 1.71(1.19–2.47) | 8.40 | 0.004 |
| Allele A | 497(41.83%) | 406(47.76%) | 1 | ||
| Allele T | 691(58.16%) | 444(52.24% | 1.27(1.07–1.52) | 7.06 | 0.01 |
| rs622502 | |||||
| GG | 529(89.06%) | 372(87.53%) | 1 | 1.13 | 0.57 |
| GC | 62 (10.43%) | 50 (11.76%) | 1.30(0.242–6.70) | 0.09 | 0.76 |
| CC | 3 (0.51%) | 3 (0.71%) | 1.58(0.31–8.17) | 0.30 | 0.59 |
| G | 1120(94.28%) | 794(93.41%) | 1 | ||
| C | 68(5.72%) | 56(6.59%) | 1.16(0.81–1.67) | 0.65 | 0.42 |
| rs6768300 | |||||
| CC | 532(89.56%) | 373(87.76%) | 1 | 2.32 | 0.31 |
| GC | 61 (10.27%) | 49 (11.53%) | 0.82 (0.55–1.24) | 0.86 | 0.35 |
| GG | 1 (0.17%) | 3 (0.71%) | 0.24 (0.02–2.37) | 1.51 | 0.22 |
| C | 1125(94.70%) | 795(93.53%) | 1 | ||
| G | 63(5.30%) | 55(6.47%) | 1.24(0.85–1.79) | 1.24 | 0.27 |
Data were calculated by binary logistic regression analysis.
Genotype and allelic distribution for CISH gene polymorphisms when AsC group was compared to CHB+LC group.
| SNP | AsC (N = 240) | CHB+LC (N = 354) | OR(95%CI) | x2 | adjusted P value |
| rs2239751 | |||||
| GG | 37(15.42%) | 41(11.58%) | 1 | 2.06 | 0.36 |
| GT | 102(42.50%) | 175(49.44%) | 1.47(0.86–2.51) | 2.01 | 0.16 |
| TT | 101(42.08%) | 138 (38.98%) | 1.29 (0.75–2.22) | 0.86 | 2.51 |
| G | 176(36.67%) | 257(36.30%) | 1 | ||
| T | 304(63.33%) | 451(63.70%) | 0.98(0.774–1.25) | 0.02 | 0.90 |
| rs414171 | |||||
| AA | 50(20.83%) | 57 (16.10%) | 1 | 2.32 | 0.31 |
| AT | 104(43.33%) | 179 (50.56%) | 1.45 (1.90–2.33) | 2.32 | 0.13 |
| TT | 86(35.83%) | 118 (33.33%) | 1.31(0.80–2.16) | 1.13 | 0.30 |
| A | 204(42.50%) | 293(41.38%) | 1 | ||
| T | 276(57.50%) | 415(58.62%) | 0.96(0.76–1.21) | 0.15 | 0.70 |
Genotype and allelic distribution for CISH gene polymorphisms when AsC group was compared to LC group.
| SNP | AsC(N = 240) | LC (N = 137) | OR(95%CI) | x2 | adjusted p value |
| rs2239751 | |||||
| GG | 37(15.42%) | 16(11.68%) | 1 | 3.81 | 0.15 |
| GT | 102(42.50%) | 76(55.47%) | 1.64(0.76–3.52) | 0.39 | 0.21 |
| TT | 101(42.08%) | 45(32.85%) | 0.99 (0.45–2.20) | 0.00 | 0.99 |
| G | 176(36.67%) | 108(39.42%) | 1 | ||
| T | 304(63.33%) | 166(60.58%) | 1.12(0.83–1.53) | 0.56 | 0.45 |
| rs414171 | |||||
| AA | 50(20.83%) | 21(15.33%) | 1 | 5.90 | 0.05 |
| AT | 104(43.33%) | 80(58.39%) | 1.92(0.96–3.85) | 3.41 | 0.07 |
| TT | 86(35.83%) | 36(26.28%) | 1.05(0.50–2.22) | 0.02 | 0.90 |
| A | 204(42.50%) | 122(44.53%) | 1 | ||
| T | 276(57.50%) | 152(55.47%) | 1.09(0.81–1.47) | 0.29 | 0.60 |
Results of the association test for four SNPs (rs622502, rs2239751, rs6768300 and rs414171) haplotypes in Han population from southwestern China.
| Haplotype | Cases(Freq) | Controls(Freq) | OR(95%CI) | chip-square | Adjusted p value |
|
| 689(58.00%) | 443(52.10%) | 1 | ||
| GGCA | 428(36.03%) | 350(41.20%) | 0.79(0.65–0.95) | 6.51 | 0.003 |
| CTGA | 63(5.30%) | 54(6.35%) | 0.75(0.51–1.10) | 2.18 | 0.14 |
The most common haplotype as the reference.
Figure 1Effect of the rs414171 polymorphism on promoter transcriptional activity.
Significantly higher luciferase activities were generated by the pGL3-Basic-T construct as compared to the pGL3-Basic-A construct. (***P<0.001).