| Literature DB >> 24963473 |
Alessandro Picelli1, Stefano Tamburin2, Francesca Gajofatto1, Giampietro Zanette3, Marialuigia Praitano3, Leopold Saltuari4, Claudio Corradini5, Nicola Smania6.
Abstract
Association between the site of brain injury and poststroke spasticity is poorly understood. The present study investigated whether lesion analysis could document brain regions associated with the development of severe upper limb poststroke spasticity. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 39 chronic stroke patients. Spasticity was assessed at the affected upper limb with the modified Ashworth scale (shoulder, elbow, wrist, and fingers). Brain lesions were traced from magnetic resonance imaging performed within the first 7 days after stroke and region of interest images were generated. The association between severe upper limb spasticity (modified Ashworth scale ≥ 2) and lesion location was determined with the voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping method implemented in MRIcro software. Colored maps representing the z statistics were generated and overlaid onto the automated anatomical labeling and the Johns Hopkins University white matter templates provided with MRIcron. Thalamic nuclei were identified with the Talairach Daemon software. Injuries to the insula, the thalamus, the basal ganglia, and white matter tracts (internal capsule, corona radiata, external capsule, and superior longitudinal fasciculus) were significantly associated with severe upper limb poststroke spasticity. Further advances in our understanding of the neural correlates of spasticity may lead to early targeted rehabilitation when key regions are damaged.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24963473 PMCID: PMC4055577 DOI: 10.1155/2014/162754
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Flow diagram of the study.
Demographic, clinical, and MRI characteristics of the patients.
| Patient | Age | Sex | Time from stroke (mos) | Stroke side | Stroke location | ESS score | Lesion voxels ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1, SP− | 65 | M | 3 | L | Subcortical | 83 | 90067 |
| 2, SP− | 75 | F | 4 | R | Subcortical | 80 | 898 |
| 3, SP− | 80 | F | 5 | L | Subcortical | 94 | 1584 |
| 4, SP− | 75 | F | 6 | L | Subcortical | 92 | 11377 |
| 5, SP− | 67 | F | 3 | R | Mixed | 81 | 4264 |
| 6, SP− | 78 | M | 4 | R | Cortical | 88 | 8171 |
| 7, SP− | 83 | M | 5 | L | Mixed | 81 | 3561 |
| 8, SP− | 76 | F | 4 | L | Subcortical | 97 | 4829 |
| 9, SP− | 67 | M | 6 | L | Subcortical | 81 | 3558 |
| 10, SP− | 59 | M | 3 | R | Mixed | 88 | 2455 |
| 11, SP− | 63 | F | 4 | R | Mixed | 80 | 44832 |
| 12, SP− | 83 | M | 5 | R | Cortical | 100 | 4264 |
| 13, SP− | 68 | M | 6 | L | Mixed | 83 | 6299 |
| 14, SP− | 76 | M | 4 | R | Subcortical | 84 | 2265 |
| 15, SP− | 73 | M | 3 | L | Subcortical | 96 | 44575 |
| 16, SP− | 80 | F | 4 | R | Mixed | 90 | 2544 |
| 17, SP− | 69 | M | 6 | L | Cortical | 70 | 1626 |
| 18, SP− | 75 | M | 6 | L | Mixed | 96 | 3985 |
| 19, SP− | 66 | M | 5 | L | Subcortical | 85 | 4829 |
| 20, SP− | 64 | M | 5 | L | Cortical | 100 | 8171 |
| 21, SP− | 77 | F | 6 | R | Mixed | 78 | 3561 |
| 22, SP− | 85 | F | 4 | R | Cortical | 100 | 130059 |
| 23, SP− | 56 | M | 3 | R | Mixed | 100 | 3177 |
| 24, SP− | 60 | F | 4 | L | Mixed | 100 | 210 |
| 25, SP+ | 78 | F | 3 | R | Cortical | 53 | 13645 |
| 26, SP+ | 66 | F | 6 | L | Mixed | 50 | 290752 |
| 27, SP+ | 72 | M | 4 | L | Subcortical | 64 | 110211 |
| 28, SP+ | 75 | M | 4 | R | Cortical | 62 | 73818 |
| 29, SP+ | 69 | M | 3 | L | Mixed | 61 | 60229 |
| 30, SP+ | 67 | M | 3 | L | Mixed | 58 | 33799 |
| 31, SP+ | 73 | M | 4 | R | Mixed | 51 | 3050 |
| 32, SP+ | 74 | M | 6 | R | Cortical | 61 | 3251 |
| 33, SP+ | 78 | F | 5 | L | Mixed | 58 | 145595 |
| 34, SP+ | 79 | F | 5 | L | Mixed | 30 | 89151 |
| 35, SP+ | 66 | F | 6 | L | Subcortical | 64 | 60102 |
| 36, SP+ | 84 | M | 6 | L | Subcortical | 53 | 26852 |
| 37, SP+ | 76 | M | 3 | R | Mixed | 34 | 17465 |
| 38, SP+ | 80 | M | 4 | R | Mixed | 30 | 10276 |
| 39, SP+ | 78 | M | 5 | R | Mixed | 45 | 18057 |
SP−: patient without severe spasticity; SP+: patient with severe spasticity; M: male; F: female; R: right; L: left; ESS: European Stroke Scale.
Figure 2Overlay of lesions for all patients.
Figure 3Statistical voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping. The nonparametric Liebermeister statistical analysis was used for the binary variable severe poststroke spasticity. Here all voxels that survived a 1% false discovery rate cut-off threshold are reported. The yellow box highlights the distribution of thalamic significant voxels, which corresponded to the ventral posterior nucleus in the Talairach atlas.
Brain regions associated with severe upper limb spasticity.
| Region |
|
|
| LB |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Insula | 33 | −7 | 20 | 3.784 | 12 |
| Caudate | 19 | −13 | 21 | 3.827 | 56 |
| Putamen | 28 | 4 | 13 | 3.827 | 256 |
| Pallidum | 22 | 5 | 2 | 3.467 | 8 |
| Thalamus | 22 | −17 | 4 | 3.467 | 65 |
| Anterior limb of internal capsule | 21 | 22 | 0 | 3.643 | 10 |
| Posterior limb of internal capsule | 26 | −25 | 17 | 3.827 | 136 |
| Retrolenticular part of internal capsule | 23 | −25 | 4 | 3.467 | 174 |
| Anterior corona radiate | 21 | 23 | −1 | 3.643 | 149 |
| Superior corona radiate | 29 | −6 | 19 | 4.188 | 226 |
| Posterior corona radiate | 26 | −25 | 19 | 3.827 | 184 |
| External capsule | 28 | 4 | 13 | 3.827 | 159 |
| Superior longitudinal fasciculus | 30 | −5 | 21 | 4.188 | 133 |
For each region, the Montreal Neurological Institute coordinates of the centre of mass are provided along with the maximum Liebermeister (LB) z statistic in each cluster and the number (n) of clustering voxels that survived the threshold of P < 0.05, false discovery rate corrected.