| Literature DB >> 24963408 |
Anjoo Yadav1, Vinod Kumar2, Richa Niranjan3.
Abstract
Study of skulls has attracted the attention of anatomists since ages and sporadic attempts have been made to study skulls from time to time. Talking about the pterygoid processes of sphenoid bone, the irregular posterior border of lateral pterygoid plate usually presents, towards its upper part, a pterygospinous process, from which the pterygospinous ligament extends backwards and laterally to the spine of sphenoid. This ligament sometimes gets ossified as pterygospinous bar and a foramen is then formed, named pterygospinous foramen, for the passage of muscular branches of mandibular nerve. The present study was undertaken to observe the incidence and status of pterygospinous bony bridge and foramen, its variations, and clinical relevance in the adult human skulls of North India. For this purpose, 500 skulls were observed, belonging to the Anthropology Museum of Department of Anatomy, GSVM Medical College, Kanpur. Pterygospinous bars were found to be present in 51 skulls (10.2%), out of which completely ossified pterygospinous bony bridges were present in 20 skulls (4%) while 31 skulls (6.2%) had incompletely ossified pterygospinous ligaments. Such variations are of clinical significance for radiologists, neurologists, maxillofacial and dental surgeons, and anaesthetists, too.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24963408 PMCID: PMC4055007 DOI: 10.1155/2014/286794
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anat Res Int ISSN: 2090-2743
Figure 1Completely ossified pterygospinous bar and foramen on the right side (arrow).
Figure 4Completely ossified pterygospinous bar on the right side (arrow).
Figure 3Complete pterygospinous bar and foramen on the left side (arrow).
Figure 2Incompletely ossified pterygospinous ligament on the right side (arrows).
Incidence of pterygospinous bar and foramen in present study.
| Total skulls observed | 500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) Pterygospinous bar present in | 51 (10.2%) | |||
|
| ||||
| (2) Incompletely ossified in | 31 (6.2%) | U/L | Rt | 13 |
| Lt | 12 | |||
| B/L | 06 | |||
|
| ||||
| (3) Completely ossified in | 20 (4%) | U/L | Rt | 14 |
| Lt | 06 | |||
| B/L | 00 | |||
Various measurements regarding PS bridging.
| (1) In case of complete pterygospinous bridging | Mean length of PS bar | Rt side | Lt side |
| 7.8 mm | 8.0 mm | ||
| Mean breadth of PS bar | 2.0 mm | 1.8 mm | |
| Max. diameter of PS foramina | 7.8 mm | 8.0 mm | |
|
| |||
| (2) In case of incompletely ossified pterygospinous bar | Gap/distance between the 2 separate ends | 5.0 mm | 5.0 mm |
Comparative table for incidence of ossified pterygospinous ligament.
| S. number | Research worker | Year | Skulls studied | Total incidence | Incompletely ossified PS ligament in | Completely ossified PS bar in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wood [ | 1931 | Hawaiian | 8% | ||
| 2 | Kapur et al. [ | 2000 | Croats | 18.36% | 14.7% | 3.6% |
| 3 | Peker et al. [ | 2002 | Anatolian | 5.5% | — | 5.5% |
| 4 |
Lüdinghausen et al. [ | 2006 | German | 6% | — | 6% |
| 5 | Nayak et al. [ | 2007 | Indian | 9.61% | 3.84% | 5.76% |
| 6 | Antonopoulou et al. [ | 2008 | Greek | 14% | 12% | 2% |
| 7 | Shinde et al. [ | 2011 | Indian | 3.07% | 3.07% | — |
| 8 | Agarwal et al. [ | 2012 | Indian | 9.7% | 6.72% | 2.98% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|