Literature DB >> 24962900

Quantitative evaluation of CT-perfusion map as indicator of tumor response to transarterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation in HCC patients.

Davide Ippolito1, Davide Fior2, Pietro Andrea Bonaffini2, Cristina Capraro2, Davide Leni3, Rocco Corso3, Sandro Sironi2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess if radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) may influence the evaluation of perfusion parameters obtained with CT-perfusion (CT-p) in HCC treated patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-three consecutive cirrhotic patients with biopsy-proven diagnosis of HCC lesions and candidates to TACE or RFA were included. The CT-p study of hepatic parenchyma and of treated lesions was performed about 1 month after treatment on 16 multidetector CT after injection of 50mL of non ionic contrast agent (350mg I/mL) at a flow rate of 6mL/s acquiring 40 dynamic scans. A dedicated perfusion software which generated a quantitative map of arterial and portal perfusion by means of colour scale was employed.The following perfusion parameters were assessed before and after RFA or TACE treatment: hepatic perfusion (HP), arterial perfusion (AP), blood volume (BV), time to peak (TTP), hepatic perfusion index (HPI).
RESULTS: A complete treatment was obtained in 16 cases and incomplete treatment in the 17 remaining cases. The perfusion data of completely treated lesions were: HP 10.2±6.3; AP 10.4±7; BV 4.05±4.8; TTP 38.9±4.2; HPI 9.9±9.2, whereas in partially treated lesions were: HP 43.2±15.1mL/s/100g; AP 38.7±8.8mL/min; BV 20.7±9.5mL/100mg; TTP 24±3.7s; HPI 61.7±7.5%. In adjacent cirrhotic parenchyma, the parameters of all evaluated patients were: HP 13.2±4; AP 12.3±3.4; BV 11.8±2.8; TTP 43.9±2.9; and HPI 17.1±9.8. A significant difference (P<0.001) was found for all parameters between residual viable tumor tissue (P<0.001) compared to successfully treated lesion due to the presence of residual arterial vascular structure in viable portion of treated HCC.
CONCLUSION: According to our results, CT-p evaluation is not influenced by TACE or RFA treatments, thus representing a feasible technique that allows a reproducible quantitative evaluation of treatment response in HCC patients.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Perfusion-CT; Radiofrequency ablation; Transarterial chemoembolization; Treatment response

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24962900     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.05.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  17 in total

1.  The prognostic correlation between CD105 expression level in tumor tissue and peripheral blood and sunitinib administration in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Yi Yang; Qiaobin Guan; Li Guo; Chenyang Han
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 4.742

2.  Can dual-energy CT replace perfusion CT for the functional evaluation of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma?

Authors:  Sébastien Mulé; Frédéric Pigneur; Ronan Quelever; Arthur Tenenhaus; Laurence Baranes; Philippe Richard; Vania Tacher; Edouard Herin; Hugo Pasquier; Maxime Ronot; Alain Rahmouni; Valérie Vilgrain; Alain Luciani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Advanced imaging techniques in the therapeutic response of transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Ke Yang; Xiao-Ming Zhang; Lin Yang; Hao Xu; Juan Peng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and sorafenib: Diagnosis, indications, clinical and radiological follow-up.

Authors:  Stefano Colagrande; Francesco Regini; Gian Giacomo Taliani; Cosimo Nardi; Andrea Lorenzo Inghilesi
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-05-18

Review 5.  Multidisciplinary perspective of hepatocellular carcinoma: A Pacific Northwest experience.

Authors:  Matthew M Yeh; Raymond S Yeung; Smith Apisarnthanarax; Renuka Bhattacharya; Carlos Cuevas; William P Harris; Tony Lim Kiat Hon; Siddharth A Padia; James O Park; Kevin M Riggle; Sayed S Daoud
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-06-18

6.  Microvascular Perfusion Changes following Transarterial Hepatic Tumor Embolization.

Authors:  Carmen Gacchina Johnson; Karun V Sharma; Elliot B Levy; David L Woods; Aaron H Morris; John D Bacher; Andrew L Lewis; Bradford J Wood; Matthew R Dreher
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.464

7.  Novel Imaging Diagnosis for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Consensus from the 5th Asia-Pacific Primary Liver Cancer Expert Meeting (APPLE 2014).

Authors:  Bang-Bin Chen; Takamichi Murakami; Tiffany Ting-Fang Shih; Michiie Sakamoto; Osamu Matsui; Byung-Ihn Choi; Myeong-Jin Kim; Jeong Min Lee; Ren-Jie Yang; Meng-Su Zeng; Ran-Chou Chen; Ja-Der Liang
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 11.740

8.  Iodine concentration as a perfusion surrogate marker in oncology: Further elucidation of the underlying mechanisms using Volume Perfusion CT with 80 kVp.

Authors:  Wolfgang M Thaiss; Ulrike Haberland; Sascha Kaufmann; Daniel Spira; Christoph Thomas; Konstantin Nikolaou; Marius Horger; Alexander W Sauter
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  MRI Findings and Prediction of Time to Progression of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Drug-eluting Bead Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization.

Authors:  Seungsoo Lee; Kyung Ah Kim; Mi-Suk Park; Sun Young Choi
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  Nuclear scaffold protein p54nrb/NONO facilitates the hypoxia-enhanced progression of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Mengqin Shen; Ruixue Zhang; Wenzhi Jia; Zongping Zhu; Xiaoping Zhao; Li Zhao; Gang Huang; Jianjun Liu
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 9.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.