Literature DB >> 24962659

Prospective evaluation of diffusion-weighted MRI of the bladder as a biomarker for prediction of bladder cancer aggressiveness.

Sabina Sevcenco1, Lothar Ponhold2, Gertraud Heinz-Peer2, Harun Fajkovic1, Andrea Haitel3, Martin Susani3, Shahrokh F Shariat1, Tibor Szarvas1, Pascal A T Baltzer4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To prospectively test the utility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) for bladder cancer (BCA) staging and grading. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We prospectively enrolled 51 consecutive patients (median age = 64 y, range: 30-90y) with suspected BCA with or without gross hematuria who received 3-T DW-MRI before transurethral resection of the bladder. Parametric apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were automatically calculated from DW-MRI. ADC values (given in × 10(-3)mm(2)/s) of bladder lesions were independently measured by 2 radiologists blinded to histopathology. Comparisons of ADC values with histopathologic features were performed using unpaired t tests. Diagnostic performance was calculated by means of receiver operating characteristics (ROC) statistics.
RESULTS: We excluded 8 patients: 1 presenting with metastatic melanoma to the bladder, 1 who had an incomplete examination, and 6 without BCA. In the 43 remaining patients (median age = 68 y, range: 41-85 y), the ADC values were lower in high-grade (n = 19, ADC = 0.787) compared with low-grade (n = 24, ADC = 1.233) tumors (P<0.0001) and in muscle-invasive tumors (n = 10, ADC = 0.759) compared with non-muscle-invasive tumors (n = 33, ADC = 1.120, P = 0.0004). The area under the ROC curve was 0.884 for prediction of muscle invasion and 0.906 for prediction of high grade by using ADC values. Rule-in ADC criteria for high-grade lesions and rule-out ADC criteria for muscle invasion were identified by ROC analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: ADC measurements obtained by DW-MRI are a promising imaging biomarker for prediction of BCA stage and grade providing high sensitivity and specificity. Further studies are necessary to establish the value of this test in guiding decision making in clinical practice.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarker; Bladder cancer; Diffusion-weighted imaging; Muscle invasiveness; Sensitivity and specificity; Staging

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24962659     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.04.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  9 in total

Review 1.  Preoperative imaging for staging bladder cancer.

Authors:  Maxim J McKibben; Michael E Woods
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Advances in Imaging in Prostate and Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Abhishek Srivastava; Laura M Douglass; Victoria Chernyak; Kara L Watts
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Radiomics assessment of bladder cancer grade using texture features from diffusion-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Xi Zhang; Xiaopan Xu; Qiang Tian; Baojuan Li; Yuxia Wu; Zengyue Yang; Zhengrong Liang; Yang Liu; Guangbin Cui; Hongbing Lu
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 4.  Pitfalls and Limitations of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Urinary Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Wei-Ching Lin; Jeon-Hor Chen
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.243

5.  Building bridges in urothelial carcinoma to face common challenges.

Authors:  Romain Mathieu; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2016-10

Review 6.  Evaluation of lymph node status in patients with urothelial carcinoma-still in search of the perfect imaging modality: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michał Frączek; Hubert Kamecki; Anna Kamecka; Roman Sosnowski; Katarzyna Sklinda; Marcin Czarniecki; Leszek Królicki; Jerzy Walecki
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-10

7.  A glance at imaging bladder cancer.

Authors:  Ebru Salmanoglu; Ethan Halpern; Edouard J Trabulsi; Sung Kim; Mathew L Thakur
Journal:  Clin Transl Imaging       Date:  2018-05-16

Review 8.  Imaging of Bladder Cancer: Standard Applications and Future Trends.

Authors:  Rasha Taha Abouelkheir; Abdalla Abdelhamid; Mohamed Abou El-Ghar; Tarek El-Diasty
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.430

Review 9.  Study Progress of Noninvasive Imaging and Radiomics for Decoding the Phenotypes and Recurrence Risk of Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Xiaopan Xu; Huanjun Wang; Yan Guo; Xi Zhang; Baojuan Li; Peng Du; Yang Liu; Hongbing Lu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 6.244

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.