Literature DB >> 24962533

Effects of demographic factors and information sources on United States consumer perceptions of animal welfare.

M G S McKendree1, C C Croney2, N J O Widmar3.   

Abstract

As consumers have become more interested in understanding how their food is produced, scrutiny and criticism have increased regarding intensified food animal production methods. Resolution of public concerns about animal agricultural practices depends on understanding the myriad factors that provide the basis for concerns. An online survey of 798 U.S. households was conducted to investigate relationships between household characteristics (demographics, geographic location, and experiences) and level of concern for animal welfare as well as sources used to obtain information on the subject. Because recent media attention has focused on animal care practices used in the U.S. swine industry, respondents were also asked specific questions pertaining to their perceptions of pig management practices and welfare issues and their corresponding pork purchasing behavior. Respondents reporting higher levels of concern about animal welfare were more frequently female, younger, and self-reported members of the Democratic Party. Fourteen percent of respondents reported reduction in pork consumption because of animal welfare concerns with an average reduction of 56%. Over half of the respondents (56%) did not have a primary source for animal welfare information; those who identified a primary information source most commonly used information provided by animal protection organizations, the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), and People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA). Midwest participants were significantly, at the 5% significance level, less concerned about domestic livestock animal welfare and more frequently reported not having a source for animal welfare information than those from other regions of the United States. Overall, the U.S. livestock and poultry industries and other organizations affiliated with animal agriculture appear to be less used public sources of information on animal welfare than popular animal protection organizations. Improved understanding of the factors that contribute to consumers' evolving perceptions of the care and welfare of farm animals is an essential step toward enhanced sustainability and social responsibility in contemporary food production systems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal welfare; consumer perceptions; information source; pork

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24962533     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2014-6874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  14 in total

Review 1.  What We Know about the Public's Level of Concern for Farm Animal Welfare in Food Production in Developed Countries.

Authors:  Amelia Cornish; David Raubenheimer; Paul McGreevy
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 2.752

2.  Online Chats to Assess Stakeholder Perceptions of Meat Chicken Intensification and Welfare.

Authors:  Tiffani J Howell; Vanessa I Rohlf; Grahame J Coleman; Jean-Loup Rault
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  American Citizens' Views of an Ideal Pig Farm.

Authors:  Patrycia Sato; Maria J Hötzel; Marina A G von Keyserlingk
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  A Decade of Progress toward Ending the Intensive Confinement of Farm Animals in the United States.

Authors:  Sara Shields; Paul Shapiro; Andrew Rowan
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Factors influencing public support for dairy tie stall housing in the U.S.

Authors:  Jesse A Robbins; Caitlin Roberts; Daniel M Weary; Becca Franks; Marina A G von Keyserlingk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Social desirability bias in reporting of holiday season healthfulness.

Authors:  Nicole J Olynk Widmar; Elizabeth S Byrd; S R Dominick; Christopher A Wolf; Lalatendu Acharya
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2016-06-29

7.  Perceptions of Hunting and Hunters by U.S. Respondents.

Authors:  Elizabeth Byrd; John G Lee; Nicole J Olynk Widmar
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Of Fur, Feather, and Fin: Human's Use and Concern for Non-Human Species.

Authors:  Elizabeth Byrd; Nicole Olynk Widmar; Joan Fulton
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Are They Buying It? United States Consumers' Changing Attitudes toward More Humanely Raised Meat, Eggs, and Dairy.

Authors:  C Victor Spain; Daisy Freund; Heather Mohan-Gibbons; Robert G Meadow; Laurie Beacham
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Veterinarians Experience Animal Welfare Control Work as Stressful.

Authors:  Sofia Väärikkälä; Laura Hänninen; Mari Nevas
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-02-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.