Literature DB >> 24962470

Cefazolin concentration in surgically created wounds treated with negative pressure wound therapy compared to surgically created wounds treated with nonadherent wound dressings.

Julia V Coutin1, Otto I Lanz, Geraldine C Magnin-Bissel, Marion F Ehrich, Emily I Miller, Stephen R Werre, Thomas O Riegel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare cefazolin concentrations in biopsied tissue samples collected from surgically created wounds treated with negative pressure wound therapy to those collected from surgically created wounds treated with nonadherent dressings. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective, controlled, experimental study. ANIMALS: Adult female spayed Beagles (n = 12).
METHODS: Full thickness cutaneous wounds were created on each antebrachium (n = 24). Immediately after surgery, cefazolin (22 mg/kg intravenously [IV]) was administered to each dog and continued every 8 hours during the study. The right wound was randomly assigned to group I or group II whereas the wound on the contralateral antebrachium was assigned to the other group. Group I wounds were treated with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and group II wounds were treated with nonadherent dressings for 3 days. Dressings were changed and tissue biopsies obtained from wound beds at 24 hours intervals for both groups. Cefazolin wound tissue and plasma concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Blood samples for measuring plasma cefazolin concentrations were collected before biopsy sampling. At the time of surgery and at each subsequent bandage change, wound beds were swabbed and submitted for aerobic and anaerobic culture.
RESULTS: After initiating cefazolin treatment, wound tissue antibiotic concentrations between treatment groups were not significantly different at any sampling time. Similarly, after initiating cefazolin treatment, plasma cefazolin concentrations were not significantly different at any sampling time for individual dogs.
CONCLUSIONS: Using a canine experimental model, NPWT treatment of surgically created wounds does not statistically impact cefazolin tissue concentrations when compared with conventional nonadherent bandage therapy. © Copyright 2014 by The American College of Veterinary Surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24962470     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2014.12218.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Surg        ISSN: 0161-3499            Impact factor:   1.495


  2 in total

1.  Wound Penetration of Cefazolin, Ciprofloxacin, Piperacillin, Tazobactam, and Vancomycin During Negative Pressure Wound Therapy.

Authors:  Matthew P Rowan; Krista L Niece; Julie A Rizzo; Kevin S Akers
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 2.  Filling the vacuum: Role of negative pressure wound therapy in open wound management in cats.

Authors:  Mirja C Nolff
Journal:  J Feline Med Surg       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 2.015

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.