PURPOSE: Rabbit antithymocyte globulin (ATG) is commonly used before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) to prevent graft-versus-host disease. Studies comparing the effect of different ATG preparations and dosages on immune reconstitution and risk for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-mediated post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) are rare. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we determined T and B cell subsets by flow cytometry after allo-HSCT in children, who received ATG-Genzyme (ATG-G, n = 15), ATG-Fresenius (ATG-F, n = 25) or no-ATG treatment (n = 19). Additionally, PCR-quantified EBV-genome copy counts were correlated with incidence of PTLD. RESULTS: We could confirm a dose-dependent impairment of CD8(+) and CD4(+) T cell regeneration by ATG-G, including naïve and memory CD4(+) T cells. No differences were seen between the currently applied dosages of 5-10 mg/kg ATG-G and 20-60 mg/kg ATG-F. Significantly delayed T cell subset reconstitution was determined only at high dosages of 20-60 mg/kg ATG-G compared to ATG-F. B cell reconstitution was comparably impaired in ATG-G- and ATG-F-treated patients. Although the incidence of EBV reactivation was similar in both ATG groups, EBV copy counts of >10(4) copies/10(5) peripheral blood mononuclear cells and the occurrence of PTLD were only found in ATG-G-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that high, but importantly not currently applied low dosages of ATG-G, impair thymic T cell regeneration and memory T cell immunity to a greater extent than ATG-F in pediatric patients. In addition, our results suggest an increased risk for EBV-PTLD when treated with ATG-G. Prospective studies are warranted to compare different ATG preparations with regard to the immune reconstitution and EBV-PTLD.
PURPOSE:Rabbit antithymocyte globulin (ATG) is commonly used before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) to prevent graft-versus-host disease. Studies comparing the effect of different ATG preparations and dosages on immune reconstitution and risk for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-mediated post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) are rare. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we determined T and B cell subsets by flow cytometry after allo-HSCT in children, who received ATG-Genzyme (ATG-G, n = 15), ATG-Fresenius (ATG-F, n = 25) or no-ATG treatment (n = 19). Additionally, PCR-quantified EBV-genome copy counts were correlated with incidence of PTLD. RESULTS: We could confirm a dose-dependent impairment of CD8(+) and CD4(+) T cell regeneration by ATG-G, including naïve and memory CD4(+) T cells. No differences were seen between the currently applied dosages of 5-10 mg/kg ATG-G and 20-60 mg/kg ATG-F. Significantly delayed T cell subset reconstitution was determined only at high dosages of 20-60 mg/kg ATG-G compared to ATG-F. B cell reconstitution was comparably impaired in ATG-G- and ATG-F-treated patients. Although the incidence of EBV reactivation was similar in both ATG groups, EBV copy counts of >10(4) copies/10(5) peripheral blood mononuclear cells and the occurrence of PTLD were only found in ATG-G-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that high, but importantly not currently applied low dosages of ATG-G, impair thymic T cell regeneration and memory T cell immunity to a greater extent than ATG-F in pediatric patients. In addition, our results suggest an increased risk for EBV-PTLD when treated with ATG-G. Prospective studies are warranted to compare different ATG preparations with regard to the immune reconstitution and EBV-PTLD.
Authors: J W van Esser; B van der Holt; E Meijer; H G Niesters; R Trenschel; S F Thijsen; A M van Loon; F Frassoni; A Bacigalupo; U W Schaefer; A D Osterhaus; J W Gratama; B Löwenberg; L F Verdonck; J J Cornelissen Journal: Blood Date: 2001-08-15 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Claudio G Brunstein; Daniel J Weisdorf; Todd DeFor; Juliet N Barker; Jakub Tolar; Jo-Anne H van Burik; John E Wagner Journal: Blood Date: 2006-06-27 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: A Kumar; A R Mhaskar; T Reljic; R S Mhaskar; M A Kharfan-Dabaja; C Anasetti; M Mohty; B Djulbegovic Journal: Leukemia Date: 2011-12-20 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Ola Landgren; Ethel S Gilbert; J Douglas Rizzo; Gérard Socié; Peter M Banks; Kathleen A Sobocinski; Mary M Horowitz; Elaine S Jaffe; Douglas W Kingma; Lois B Travis; Mary E Flowers; Paul J Martin; H Joachim Deeg; Rochelle E Curtis Journal: Blood Date: 2009-03-05 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Jan Styczynski; Walter van der Velden; Christopher P Fox; Dan Engelhard; Rafael de la Camara; Catherine Cordonnier; Per Ljungman Journal: Haematologica Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: F Burkhalter; S Schaub; Ch Bucher; L Gürke; A Bachmann; H Hopfer; M Dickenmann; J Steiger; I Binet Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-11-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Lisa V E Oostenbrink; Cornelia M Jol-van der Zijde; Katrine Kielsen; Anja M Jansen-Hoogendijk; Marianne Ifversen; Klaus G Müller; Arjan C Lankester; Astrid G S van Halteren; Robbert G M Bredius; Marco W Schilham; Maarten J D van Tol Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2019-03-06 Impact factor: 7.561