Literature DB >> 24962197

Moving beyond science to protect a mammalian migration corridor.

Joel Berger1, Steven L Cain.   

Abstract

As the discipline of conservation biology evolves and practitioners grow increasingly concerned about how to put results into achievable conservation, it is still unclear the extent to which science drives conservation outcomes, especially across rural landscapes. We addressed this issue by examining the role of science in the protection of a biological corridor. Our focus is on a North American endemic mammal reliant on long distance migration as an adaptive strategy, the pronghorn (Antilocapra americana) of the southern Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. The role of science in realizing policy change, while critical as a first step, was surprisingly small relative to the role of other human dimensions. In a case study, we strategically addressed a variety of conservation needs beyond science, first by building a partnership between government and private interests and then by enhancing interest in migratory phenomena across a landscape with divergent political ideologies and economic bases. By developing awareness and even people's pride in the concept of corridor conservation, we achieved local, state, and federal acceptance for protection of a 70 km long, 2 km wide pathway for the longest terrestrial migrant in the contiguous United States. Key steps included conducting and publishing research that defined the migration corridor; fostering a variety of media coverage at local, regional, and national levels; conducting public outreach through stakeholder workshops, meetings, and presentations; and meeting with and gaining the support of elected officials. All these contributed to the eventual policy change that created the first federally protected migration corridor in the United States, which in turn stimulated additional conservation actions. On the basis of our experience, we believe conservation scientists can and should step beyond traditional research roles to assist with on-the-ground conservation by engaging in aspects of conservation that involve local communities and public policy.
© 2014 Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Berrendo; Grand Teton National Park; Parque Nacional Grand Teton; policy; política; pronghorn; protección; protection

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24962197     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  5 in total

1.  Can behavioural ecologists help establish protected areas?

Authors:  Tim Caro; Joel Berger
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Coexistence with Large Carnivores Supported by a Predator-Compensation Program.

Authors:  Andrea T Morehouse; Jesse Tigner; Mark S Boyce
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  A Retrospective Assessment of a Failed Collaborative Process in Conservation.

Authors:  Heidi E Kretser; Jon P Beckmann; Joel Berger
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Pronghorn population genomics show connectivity in the core of their range.

Authors:  Melanie E F LaCava; Roderick B Gagne; Sierra M Love Stowell; Kyle D Gustafson; C Alex Buerkle; Lee Knox; Holly B Ernest
Journal:  J Mammal       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 2.416

5.  A hierarchical spatiotemporal analog forecasting model for count data.

Authors:  Patrick L McDermott; Christopher K Wikle; Joshua Millspaugh
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 2.912

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.