Literature DB >> 24962192

Rescue pyloroplasty for refractory delayed gastric emptying following esophagectomy.

Jashodeep Datta1, Noel N Williams2, R Gregory Conway2, Daniel T Dempsey2, Jon B Morris2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) following esophagectomy is a debilitating complication. Rarely, failure of postoperative endoscopic therapy may necessitate rescue pyloroplasty (rPP).
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, single-institution review of rPP for post-esophagectomy DGE from 2000 to 2013. Pre- and postoperative symptoms and pharmacologic use were examined. "Successful" rPP was defined as resolution of symptoms and pharmacologic requirements postoperatively. Quality of life (QoL) was evaluated by Short Form-12 and study-specific questionnaires.
RESULTS: Thirteen patients underwent open transabdominal rescue Heineke-Mikulicz pyloroplasty. Between esophagectomy and rPP, average interval weight loss was 19 ± 15 lb over 13 months (range, 3-22). Patients underwent 3.4 ± 1.0 preoperative endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) attempts, with 7 (54%) receiving endoscopic intrapyloric botulinum toxin (IPB) injections. Median follow-up was 12 months (range, 4-23). After rPP, the incidence of nausea, vomiting, bloating, prokinetic use, and total parenteral nutrition/total enteral nutrition dependence decreased (all P < .01). All patients gained weight; 2 developed biliary reflux. Nine of 13 patients were identified as rPP successes; predictors of rPP failure were American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 3 (P = .02), greater number of EBD attempts (P = .02), longer time to rPP (P = .03), and fewer IPB injections (P = .03). QoL assessment revealed general satisfaction with postoperative outcomes and excellent physical and mental functioning.
CONCLUSION: rPP for post-esophagectomy DGE is well-tolerated, results in improvements in symptoms and pharmacologic dependence, and satisfactorily preserves QoL.
Copyright © 2014 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24962192     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.03.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  6 in total

1.  Per-Oral Pyloromyotomy (POP) for Medically Refractory Post-Surgical Gastroparesis.

Authors:  Andrew T Strong; Joshua P Landreneau; Michael Cline; Matthew D Kroh; John H Rodriguez; Jeffrey L Ponsky; Kevin El-Hayek
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Vagus nerve-preserving versus conventional laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection.

Authors:  Dou-Sheng Bai; Ping Chen; Sheng-Jie Jin; Jian-Jun Qian; Guo-Qing Jiang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Intraoperative Pyloric Interventions during Oesophagectomy: a Multicentre Study.

Authors:  Salvatore Marchese; Yassar A Qureshi; Shazia P Hafiz; Khaled Dawas; Paul Turner; M Muntzer Mughal; Borzoueh Mohammadi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Treating Early Delayed Gastric Tube Emptying after Esophagectomy with Pneumatic Pyloric Dilation.

Authors:  Alexander Mertens; Jan Gooszen; Paul Fockens; Rogier Voermans; Suzanne Gisbertz; Arjan Bredenoord; Mark Ivo van Berge Henegouwen
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 2.588

5.  Pylorus drainage procedures in thoracoabdominal esophagectomy - a single-center experience and review of the literature.

Authors:  Stefan Fritz; Katharina Feilhauer; André Schaudt; Hansjörg Killguss; Eduard Esianu; René Hennig; Jörg Köninger
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Management of gastric conduit retention following hybrid and minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: Two retrospective case series.

Authors:  Ingvild Farnes; Egil Johnson; Hans-Olaf Johannessen
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2017-11-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.