Literature DB >> 24962187

Quantifying technical skills during open operations using video-based motion analysis.

Carly E Glarner1, Yue-Yung Hu2, Chia-Hsiung Chen3, Robert G Radwin4, Qianqian Zhao5, Mark W Craven6, Douglas A Wiegmann4, Carla M Pugh7, Matthew J Carty6, Caprice C Greenberg8.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Objective quantification of technical operative skills in surgery remains poorly defined, although the delivery of and training in these skills is essential to the profession of surgery. Attempts to measure hand kinematics to quantify operative performance primarily have relied on electromagnetic sensors attached to the surgeon's hand or instrument. We sought to determine whether a similar motion analysis could be performed with a marker-less, video-based review, allowing for a scalable approach to performance evaluation.
METHODS: We recorded six reduction mammoplasty operations-a plastic surgery procedure in which the attending and resident surgeons operate in parallel. Segments representative of surgical tasks were identified with Multimedia Video Task Analysis software. Video digital processing was used to extract and analyze the spatiotemporal characteristics of hand movement.
RESULTS: Attending plastic surgeons appear to use their nondominant hand more than residents when cutting with the scalpel, suggesting more use of countertraction. While suturing, attendings were more ambidextrous, with smaller differences in movement between their dominant and nondominant hands than residents. Attendings also seem to have more conservation of movement when performing instrument tying than residents, as demonstrated by less nondominant hand displacement. These observations were consistent within procedures and between the different attending plastic surgeons evaluated in this fashion.
CONCLUSION: Video motion analysis can be used to provide objective measurement of technical skills without the need for sensors or markers. Such data could be valuable in better understanding the acquisition and degradation of operative skills, providing enhanced feedback to shorten the learning curve.
Copyright © 2014 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24962187      PMCID: PMC4150845          DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.04.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  16 in total

1.  The use of electromagnetic motion tracking analysis to objectively measure open surgical skill in the laboratory-based model.

Authors:  V Datta; S Mackay; M Mandalia; A Darzi
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  The relationship between motion analysis and surgical technical assessments.

Authors:  Vivek Datta; Avril Chang; Sean Mackay; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 3.  Objective assessment of technical surgical skills.

Authors:  P D van Hove; G J M Tuijthof; E G G Verdaasdonk; L P S Stassen; J Dankelman
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Evaluating surgical dexterity during corneal suturing.

Authors:  George M Saleh; George Voyatzis; Yiorgos Voyazis; Julian Hance; Joel Ratnasothy; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-09

Review 5.  Safe introduction of new procedures and emerging technologies in surgery: education, credentialing, and privileging.

Authors:  Ajit K Sachdeva; Thomas R Russell
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Surgical privileging and credentialing: a report of a discussion and study group of the American Surgical Association.

Authors:  Barbara L Bass; Hiram C Polk; R Scott Jones; Courtney M Townsend; Anthony D Whittemore; Carlos A Pellegrini; Ronald W Busuttil; Keith D Lillemoe; Donald D Trunkey; Michael W Mulholland; Jay L Grosfeld
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Evaluation of colonoscopy technical skill levels by use of an objective kinematic-based system.

Authors:  Keith L Obstein; Vaibhav D Patil; Jagadeesan Jayender; Raúl San José Estépar; Inbar S Spofford; Balazs I Lengyel; Kirby G Vosburgh; Christopher C Thompson
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Human error, not communication and systems, underlies surgical complications.

Authors:  Peter J Fabri; José L Zayas-Castro
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Automated video exposure assessment of repetitive hand activity level for a load transfer task.

Authors:  Chia-Hsiung Chen; Yu Hen Hu; Thomas Y Yen; Robert G Radwin
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.888

10.  Intraoperative assessment of technical skills on live patients using economy of hand motion: establishing learning curves of surgical competence.

Authors:  Ethan D Grober; Matthew Roberts; Eyun-Jung Shin; Mohammed Mahdi; Vanessa Bacal
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  9 in total

1.  A Pilot Study on Measuring Tissue Motion During Carotid Surgery Using Video-Based Analyses for the Objective Assessment of Surgical Performance.

Authors:  Taku Sugiyama; Toshitaka Nakamura; Yasuhiro Ito; Kikutaro Tokairin; Ken Kazumata; Naoki Nakayama; Kiyohiro Houkin
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Commentary on Varban et al.: Far from Standardized: Using Surgical Videos to Identify Variation in Technique for Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Joseph R Imbus; Luke M Funk
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 1.878

3.  Smart Sensor-Based Motion Detection System for Hand Movement Training in Open Surgery.

Authors:  Xinyao Sun; Simon Byrns; Irene Cheng; Bin Zheng; Anup Basu
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Development and evaluation of rhinoplasty spreader graft suture simulator for novice surgeons.

Authors:  Connie J Oh; Prem B Tripathi; Jeffrey T Gu; Pamela Borden; Brian J-F Wong
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Familiarity and Communication in the Operating Room.

Authors:  Lane L Frasier; Sudha R Pavuluri Quamme; Yue Ma; Douglas Wiegmann; Glen Leverson; Eva H DuGoff; Caprice C Greenberg
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 2.192

6.  A marker-less technique for measuring kinematics in the operating room.

Authors:  Lane L Frasier; David P Azari; Yue Ma; Sudha R Pavuluri Quamme; Robert G Radwin; Carla M Pugh; Thomas Y Yen; Chia-Hsiung Chen; Caprice C Greenberg
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Modeling Surgical Technical Skill Using Expert Assessment for Automated Computer Rating.

Authors:  David P Azari; Lane L Frasier; Sudha R Pavuluri Quamme; Caprice C Greenberg; Carla M Pugh; Jacob A Greenberg; Robert G Radwin
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Working volume: validity evidence for a motion-based metric of surgical efficiency.

Authors:  Anne-Lise D D'Angelo; Drew N Rutherford; Rebecca D Ray; Shlomi Laufer; Andrea Mason; Carla M Pugh
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 9.  Video-Based Coaching: Current Status and Role in Surgical Practice (Part 1) From the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Health Care Quality and Outcomes Committee.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Emily R Winslow; Joel E Goldberg; Vanita Ahuja
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 3.452

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.