S Aschauer1, G Dorffner2, F Sterz3, A Erdogmus2, A Laggner4. 1. Division of Cardiology and Angiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, WähringerGürtel 18-20, Vienna 1090, Austria. 2. Centre for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, Vienna 1090, Austria. 3. Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, WähringerGürtel 18-20, Vienna 1090, Austria. Electronic address: fritz.sterz@meduniwien.ac.at. 4. Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, WähringerGürtel 18-20, Vienna 1090, Austria.
Abstract
AIM: Improvement in predicting survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is of major medical, scientific and socioeconomic interest. The current study aimed at developing an accurate outcome-prediction tool for patients following out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was based on a cardiac arrest registry. From out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients (n=1932), a set of variables established before restoration of spontaneous circulation was explored using multivariable logistic regression. To obtain reliable estimates of the classification performance the patients were allocated to training (oldest 80%) and validation (most recent 20%) sets. The main performance parameter was the area under the ROC curve (AUC), classifying patients into survivors/non-survivors after 30 days. Based on rankings of importance, a subset of variables was selected that would have the same predictive power as the entire set. This reduced-variable set was used to derive a comprehensive score to predict mortality. RESULTS: The average AUC was 0.827 (CI 0.793-0.861) for a logistic regression model using all 21 variables. This was significantly better than the AUC for any single considered variable. The total amount of adrenaline, number of minutes to sustained restoration of spontaneous circulation, patient age and first rhythm had the same predictive power as all 21 variables. Based on this finding, our score was built and had excellent predictive accuracy (the AUC was 0.810), discriminating patients into 10%, 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% survival probabilities. CONCLUSION: The current results are promising to increase prognostication accuracy, and we are confident that our score will be helpful in the daily clinical routine.
AIM: Improvement in predicting survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is of major medical, scientific and socioeconomic interest. The current study aimed at developing an accurate outcome-prediction tool for patients following out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was based on a cardiac arrest registry. From out-of-hospital cardiac arrestpatients (n=1932), a set of variables established before restoration of spontaneous circulation was explored using multivariable logistic regression. To obtain reliable estimates of the classification performance the patients were allocated to training (oldest 80%) and validation (most recent 20%) sets. The main performance parameter was the area under the ROC curve (AUC), classifying patients into survivors/non-survivors after 30 days. Based on rankings of importance, a subset of variables was selected that would have the same predictive power as the entire set. This reduced-variable set was used to derive a comprehensive score to predict mortality. RESULTS: The average AUC was 0.827 (CI 0.793-0.861) for a logistic regression model using all 21 variables. This was significantly better than the AUC for any single considered variable. The total amount of adrenaline, number of minutes to sustained restoration of spontaneous circulation, patient age and first rhythm had the same predictive power as all 21 variables. Based on this finding, our score was built and had excellent predictive accuracy (the AUC was 0.810), discriminating patients into 10%, 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% survival probabilities. CONCLUSION: The current results are promising to increase prognostication accuracy, and we are confident that our score will be helpful in the daily clinical routine.
Authors: Chen Ji; Terry P Brown; Scott J Booth; Claire Hawkes; Jerry P Nolan; James Mapstone; Rachael T Fothergill; Robert Spaight; Sarah Black; Gavin D Perkins Journal: Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes Date: 2021-03-15
Authors: Jonghwan Shin; Yong Su Lim; Kyuseok Kim; Hui Jai Lee; Se Jong Lee; Euigi Jung; Kyoung Min You; Hyuk Jun Yang; Jin Joo Kim; Joonghee Kim; You Hwan Jo; Jae Hyuk Lee; Seong Youn Hwang Journal: Crit Care Date: 2017-12-21 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Shane Nanayakkara; Sam Fogarty; Michael Tremeer; Kelvin Ross; Brent Richards; Christoph Bergmeir; Sheng Xu; Dion Stub; Karen Smith; Mark Tacey; Danny Liew; David Pilcher; David M Kaye Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2018-11-30 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Christoph Schriefl; Christian Schoergenhofer; Florian Ettl; Michael Poppe; Christian Clodi; Matthias Mueller; Juergen Grafeneder; Bernd Jilma; Ingrid Anna Maria Magnet; Nina Buchtele; Magdalena Sophie Boegl; Michael Holzer; Fritz Sterz; Michael Schwameis Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2021-06-09
Authors: Jesper Johnsson; Ola Björnsson; Peder Andersson; Andreas Jakobsson; Tobias Cronberg; Gisela Lilja; Hans Friberg; Christian Hassager; Jesper Kjaergard; Matt Wise; Niklas Nielsen; Attila Frigyesi Journal: Crit Care Date: 2020-07-30 Impact factor: 9.097