Literature DB >> 24959766

Review of methods used for identification of biothreat agents in environmental protection and human health aspects.

Tomasz Mirski1, Michał Bartoszcze1, Agata Bielawska-Drózd1, Piotr Cieślik1, Aleksander J Michalski1, Marcin Niemcewicz1, Janusz Kocik2, Krzysztof Chomiczewski3.   

Abstract

Modern threats of bioterrorism force the need to develop methods for rapid and accurate identification of dangerous biological agents. Currently, there are many types of methods used in this field of studies that are based on immunological or genetic techniques, or constitute a combination of both methods (immuno-genetic). There are also methods that have been developed on the basis of physical and chemical properties of the analytes. Each group of these analytical assays can be further divided into conventional methods (e.g. simple antigen-antibody reactions, classical PCR, real-time PCR), and modern technologies (e.g. microarray technology, aptamers, phosphors, etc.). Nanodiagnostics constitute another group of methods that utilize the objects at a nanoscale (below 100 nm). There are also integrated and automated diagnostic systems, which combine different methods and allow simultaneous sampling, extraction of genetic material and detection and identification of the analyte using genetic, as well as immunological techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24959766     DOI: 10.5604/1232-1966.1108581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Agric Environ Med        ISSN: 1232-1966            Impact factor:   1.447


  9 in total

Review 1.  Electrochemical biosensors for pathogen detection.

Authors:  Ellen Cesewski; Blake N Johnson
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2020-04-12       Impact factor: 10.618

2.  OCaPPI-Db: an oligonucleotide probe database for pathogen identification through hybridization capture.

Authors:  Cyrielle Gasc; Antony Constantin; Faouzi Jaziri; Pierre Peyret
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 3.451

3.  Comparative analysis of the sensitivity of metagenomic sequencing and PCR to detect a biowarfare simulant (Bacillus atrophaeus) in soil samples.

Authors:  Delphine Plaire; Simon Puaud; Marie-Claude Marsolier-Kergoat; Jean-Marc Elalouf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Rapid identification of unknown pathogens in environmental samples using a high-throughput sequencing-based approach.

Authors:  Ofir Israeli; Inbar Cohen-Gihon; Anat Zvi; Shirley Lazar; Ohad Shifman; Haim Levy; Avital Tidhar; Adi Beth-Din
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-05-27

Review 5.  Nanomaterial-based sensors for the detection of biological threat agents.

Authors:  Clare E Rowland; Carl W Brown; James B Delehanty; Igor L Medintz
Journal:  Mater Today (Kidlington)       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 31.041

Review 6.  Collection, particle sizing and detection of airborne viruses.

Authors:  M Pan; J A Lednicky; C-Y Wu
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 3.772

Review 7.  Multiplex Immunoassay Techniques for On-Site Detection of Security Sensitive Toxins.

Authors:  Christopher Pöhlmann; Thomas Elßner
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 4.546

8.  Detection of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis Assisted by Micro-Raman Spectroscopy under Laboratory Conditions.

Authors:  Moisés Roberto Vallejo Pérez; Hugo Ricardo Navarro Contreras; Jesús A Sosa Herrera; José Pablo Lara Ávila; Hugo Magdaleno Ramírez Tobías; Fernando Díaz-Barriga Martínez; Rogelio Flores Ramírez; Ángel Gabriel Rodríguez Vázquez
Journal:  Plant Pathol J       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 1.795

9.  End-User Perspectives on Using Quantitative Real-Time PCR and Genomic Sequencing in the Field.

Authors:  Kyle Parker; Jonathan Forman; George Bonheyo; Brittany Knight; Rachel Bartholomew; Richard Ozanich; Kenneth B Yeh
Journal:  Trop Med Infect Dis       Date:  2022-01-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.