Literature DB >> 24959508

Evaluation of palatal plate thickness of maxillary prosthesis on phonation- a comparative clinical study.

Srujana Zakkula1, Sreedevi B2, Gopinadh Anne3, Prakash Manne2, Swetha Hima Bindu O1, Jyothi Atla4, Sneha Deepthi5, Krishna Chaitanya A5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prosthodontic treatment involves clinical procedures which influence speech performance directly or indirectly. Prosthetic rehabilitation of missing teeth with partial or complete maxillary removable dentures influences the individual voice characteristics like Phonation, resonance etc. AIM: To evaluate the effect of Acrylic palatal plate thickness (1mm-3mm) of maxillary prosthesis on phonation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve subjects were selected randomly between the age group of 20-25 years who have full complement of teeth and have no speech problems. Speech evaluation was done under four experimental conditions i.e. Without any experimental acrylic palatal plate (control), with experimental acrylic palatal plates of thickness 1 mm, 2 mm and 3 mm respectively. The speech material for phonation test consisted of Vowels sounds /a/, /i/, and /o/. Speech analysis to assess phonation was done using digital acoustic analysis (PRAAT software). The obtained results were statistically analyzed by One-way ANOVA and Tukey's multiple post-hoc for comparison of four experimental conditions with respect to different vowel sounds.
RESULTS: Mean harmonics to noise ratio (HNR) values obtained for all the Experimental conditions did not show significant difference (p>0.05). In conclusion, an increase in the thickness of the acrylic palatal plate of maxillary prosthesis for about 1 mm - 3mm in complete or partial maxillary removable dentures resulted in no significant effect on phonation of vowel sounds /a/, /i/ and /o/.
CONCLUSION: Increasing the thickness of the palatal plate from 1 mm to 3 mm has not shown any significant effect on the phonation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acoustic analysis; Experimental Palatal Plate; Phonation; Phonetics

Year:  2014        PMID: 24959508      PMCID: PMC4064927          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/7654.4224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  7 in total

1.  Can dental prostheses influence vocal parameters?

Authors:  E Seifert; C Runte; M Riebandt; A Lamprecht-Dinnesen; F Bollmann
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.426

2.  Digital acoustic analysis of five vowels in maxillectomy patients.

Authors:  Y I Sumita; S Ozawa; H Mukohyama; T Ueno; T Ohyama; H Taniguchi
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.837

3.  Influence of experimental palatal plate on mandibular position during continuous [n] phonation and at the physiologic rest position.

Authors:  Chongyang Zhou; Takaaki Matsukawa; Shinobu Shimokawara; Mineyo Sone; Hironobu Yamamoto; Katsura Ohmori; Tomohiko Yaka; Fumiko Okutsu; Toshiyuki Kusano; Shuji Ohkawa
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 2.634

4.  Influence of alterations in the oral environment on speech production.

Authors:  J Ichikawa; J Komoda; M Horiuchi; N Matsumoto
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.837

5.  Speech sound distortions caused by changes in complete denture morphology.

Authors:  A Petrović
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 3.837

6.  Harmonics-to-noise ratio as an index of the degree of hoarseness.

Authors:  E Yumoto; W J Gould; T Baer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Speech intelligibility in patients with complete dentures according to the material used.

Authors:  B Foti; P Tavitian; J J Bonfil
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.837

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.