| Literature DB >> 24959185 |
Jiansheng Li1, Liping Yang1, Qin Yao2, Ya Li3, Yange Tian3, Suyun Li3, Suli Jiang3, Ying Wang3, Xinmin Li1, Zheng Guo4.
Abstract
Bufei Yishen Formula (BYF) has been used for centuries in Asia to effectively treat patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study established a COPD animal model in rats, wherein three groups (control, COPD, and BYF) were used to evaluate the mechanism(s) and curative effect of BYF. Pulmonary function and histomorphology demonstrated that BYF had an evident effect on COPD. Gene microarray was then exploited to analyze the effects of BYF on COPD. ClueGO analysis of differentially expressed genes indicated that BYF improved COPD by regulating expression of interleukins, myosin filament assembly components, and mitochondrial electron transport-related molecules. Moreover, ELISA revealed that expression of several interleukins (IL1 β , IL6, IL8, and IL10) was reduced in peripheral blood and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by BYF treatment. It was concluded that BYF has therapeutic effects on COPD in rats through its effects on interleukin expression and/or secretion. Furthermore, pharmacological or targeted expression of two differentially expressed genes, F2R and Sprik1, might be useful in novel COPD therapies. This study provides the basis for mechanisms of BYF on COPD and new therapeutic drug targets.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24959185 PMCID: PMC4052073 DOI: 10.1155/2014/381976
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Establishment of COPD animal model.
TV, PEF, and EF50 in three experimental rat groups ().
| Index | Group | 0 weeks | 4 weeks | 8 weeks | 12 weeks | 16 weeks | 20 weeks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TV (mL) | Control | 2.86 ± 0.46 | 2.88 ± 0.33 | 2.89 ± 0.34 | 2.90 ± 0.32 | 2.91 ± 0.36 | 2.92 ± 0.24 |
| COPD | 2.90 ± 0.38 | 2.49 ± 0.24 | 2.06 ± 0.22 | 1.93 ± 0.22 | 1.92 ± 0.30 | 1.89 ± 0.36 | |
| BYF | 2.97 ± 0.46 | 2.52 ± 0.21 | 2.04 ± 0.33 | 2.11 ± 0.18 | 2.14 ± 0.25 | 2.22 ± 0.36 | |
|
| |||||||
| PEF (mL/s) | Control | 14.43 ± 2.69 | 14.72 ± 2.48 | 15.16 ± 1.99 | 15.25 ± 2.02 | 15.31 ± 1.75 | 15.30 ± 2.24 |
| COPD | 14.11 ± 2.47 | 11.28 ± 2.00 | 9.99 ± 2.33 | 9.90 ± 1.96 | 9.93 ± 2.40 | 10.02 ± 2.18 | |
| BYF | 14.49 ± 2.53 | 11.78 ± 1.96 | 10.03 ± 2.48 | 11.15 ± 2.51 | 11.81 ± 2.61 | 12.35 ± 2.84 | |
|
| |||||||
| EF50 (mL/s) | Control | 1.72 ± 0.16 | 1.76 ± 0.12 | 1.75 ± 0.15 | 1.81 ± 0.17 | 1.93 ± 0.28 | 1.97 ± 0.21 |
| COPD | 1.73 ± 0.11 | 1.49 ± 0.13 | 1.02 ± 0.17 | 0.96 ± 0.20 | 0.99 ± 0.17 | 1.05 ± 0.17 | |
| BYF | 1.71 ± 0.12 | 1.47 ± 0.20 | 1.05 ± 0.20 | 1.11 ± 0.22 | 1.17 ± 0.28 | 1.24 ± 0.28 | |
Figure 2Pulmonary function and pathology in each experimental rat group. (a) TV, PEF, and EF50. (b) Lung histomorphology observations by light microscope. Control group (magnification ×100): pulmonary tissue was smooth and there was no inflammation and cell infiltration, no hyperemia, or no swelling. COPD group (magnification ×100): pulmonary tissue showed upregulation of a severe inflammatory response with visible increases in lymphocytes, monocytes, and neutrophils. Bronchial and pulmonary wall thickness, degree of bronchial stenosis, and alveolar diameter were significantly higher. BYF group (magnification ×100): inflammation around trachea lessened after BYF therapy. The number of inflammatory cells decreased dramatically.
Figure 3Venny plot of DEGs between each experimental group and expression of 12 overlapping genes. (a) Venny plot of two DEG lists (COPD versus controls and COPD versus BYF). (b) Expression of 12 overlapping genes from all three rat groups. (b) Gene expression heat map of 12 overlapping genes.
Bingo analysis of 12 overlapping genes [23].
| GO term |
| FDR | Gene |
|---|---|---|---|
| Structural constituent of ribosome | 1.31 | 1.16 |
|
| Ribosome | 1.76 | 1.16 |
|
| Translation | 2.65 | 1.17 |
|
| Ribonucleoprotein complex | 5.64 | 1.86 |
|
| Structural molecule activity | 7.05 | 1.86 |
|
| Soft palate development | 2.16 | 3.55 |
|
| Negative regulation of RNA splicing | 2.16 | 3.55 |
|
| Macromolecular biosynthesis | 2.42 | 3.55 |
|
| Gene expression | 3.36 | 4.44 |
|
Figure 4ClueGO analysis for DEGs. (a) ClueGO analysis for DEGs between COPD and control groups. (b) ClueGO analysis for DEGs between COPD and BYF groups.
Figure 5Comparative ClueGO analysis for two DEG lists (COPD versus controls and COPD versus BYF). Red node: functions only enriched by DEGs between control and COPD groups; green node: functions only enriched by DEGs between COPD and BYF groups; white node: functions enriched by both DEG lists.
Interleukin expression levels in serum and BALF in the 20th week.
| Interleukin | Group | Serum (ng/L) | BALF (ng/L) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Control | 10.62 ± 1.68 | |
| COPD | 22.81 ± 1.34 | ||
| BYF | 17.13 ± 0.71 | ||
|
| |||
|
| Control | 52.48 ± 3.42 | |
| COPD | 148.71 ± 4.72 | ||
| BYF | 99.32 ± 4.45 | ||
|
| |||
|
| Control | 64.06 ± 8.17 | 64.60 ± 8.77 |
| COPD | 120.33 ± 7.15 | 126.60 ± 6.89 | |
| BYF | 90.33 ± 4.37 | 96.52 ± 6.90 | |
|
| |||
|
| Control | 19.72 ± 2.93 | 20.18 ± 2.43 |
| COPD | 40.50 ± 2.13 | 41.16 ± 2.58 | |
| BYF | 29.18 ± 1.55 | 29.12 ± 1.54 | |
Figure 6Interleukin expression levels in BALF and serum. (a) Expression level of IL1 and IL10 in serum. (b) Expression level of IL8 and IL10 in BALF.
Figure 7Mechanism of BYF treatment for COPD.