Federico Innocenti1, Richard L Schilsky2, Jacqueline Ramírez2, Linda Janisch2, Samir Undevia2, Larry K House2, Soma Das2, Kehua Wu2, Michelle Turcich2, Robert Marsh2, Theodore Karrison2, Michael L Maitland2, Ravi Salgia2, Mark J Ratain2. 1. Federico Innocenti, Richard L. Schilsky, Jacqueline Ramírez, Linda Janisch, Samir Undevia, Larry K. House, Soma Das, Kehua Wu, Michelle Turcich, Theodore Karrison, Michael L. Maitland, Ravi Salgia, and Mark J. Ratain, University of Chicago, Chicago; and Robert Marsh, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL. innocent@unc.edu. 2. Federico Innocenti, Richard L. Schilsky, Jacqueline Ramírez, Linda Janisch, Samir Undevia, Larry K. House, Soma Das, Kehua Wu, Michelle Turcich, Theodore Karrison, Michael L. Maitland, Ravi Salgia, and Mark J. Ratain, University of Chicago, Chicago; and Robert Marsh, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The risk of severe neutropenia from treatment with irinotecan is related in part to UGT1A1*28, a variant that reduces the elimination of SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan. We aimed to identify the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of irinotecan in patients with advanced solid tumors stratified by the *1/*1, *1/*28, and *28/*28 genotypes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-eight patients received an intravenous flat dose of irinotecan every 3 weeks. Forty-six percent of the patients had the *1/*1 genotype, 41% had the *1/*28 genotype, and 13% had the *28/*28 genotype. The starting dose of irinotecan was 700 mg in patients with the *1/*1 and *1/*28 genotypes and 500 mg in patients with the *28/*28 genotype. Pharmacokinetic evaluation was performed at cycle 1. RESULTS: In patients with the *1/*1 genotype, the MTD was 850 mg (four DLTs per 16 patients), and 1,000 mg was not tolerated (two DLTs per six patients). In patients with the *1/*28 genotype, the MTD was 700 mg (five DLTs per 22 patients), and 850 mg was not tolerated (four DLTs per six patients). In patients with the *28/*28 genotype, the MTD was 400 mg (one DLT per six patients), and 500 mg was not tolerated (three DLTs per three patients). The DLTs were mainly myelosuppression and diarrhea. Irinotecan clearance followed linear kinetics. At the MTD for each genotype, dosing by genotype resulted in similar SN-38 areas under the curve (AUCs; r(2) = 0.0003; P = .97), but the irinotecan AUC was correlated with the actual dose (r(2) = 0.39; P < .001). Four of 48 patients with disease known to be responsive to irinotecan achieved partial response. CONCLUSION: The UGT1A1*28 genotype can be used to individualize dosing of irinotecan. Additional studies should evaluate the effect of genotype-guided dosing on efficacy in patients receiving irinotecan.
PURPOSE: The risk of severe neutropenia from treatment with irinotecan is related in part to UGT1A1*28, a variant that reduces the elimination of SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan. We aimed to identify the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of irinotecan in patients with advanced solid tumors stratified by the *1/*1, *1/*28, and *28/*28 genotypes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-eight patients received an intravenous flat dose of irinotecan every 3 weeks. Forty-six percent of the patients had the *1/*1 genotype, 41% had the *1/*28 genotype, and 13% had the *28/*28 genotype. The starting dose of irinotecan was 700 mg in patients with the *1/*1 and *1/*28 genotypes and 500 mg in patients with the *28/*28 genotype. Pharmacokinetic evaluation was performed at cycle 1. RESULTS: In patients with the *1/*1 genotype, the MTD was 850 mg (four DLTs per 16 patients), and 1,000 mg was not tolerated (two DLTs per six patients). In patients with the *1/*28 genotype, the MTD was 700 mg (five DLTs per 22 patients), and 850 mg was not tolerated (four DLTs per six patients). In patients with the *28/*28 genotype, the MTD was 400 mg (one DLT per six patients), and 500 mg was not tolerated (three DLTs per three patients). The DLTs were mainly myelosuppression and diarrhea. Irinotecan clearance followed linear kinetics. At the MTD for each genotype, dosing by genotype resulted in similar SN-38 areas under the curve (AUCs; r(2) = 0.0003; P = .97), but the irinotecan AUC was correlated with the actual dose (r(2) = 0.39; P < .001). Four of 48 patients with disease known to be responsive to irinotecan achieved partial response. CONCLUSION: The UGT1A1*28 genotype can be used to individualize dosing of irinotecan. Additional studies should evaluate the effect of genotype-guided dosing on efficacy in patients receiving irinotecan.
Authors: L Iyer; S Das; L Janisch; M Wen; J Ramírez; T Karrison; G F Fleming; E E Vokes; R L Schilsky; M J Ratain Journal: Pharmacogenomics J Date: 2002 Impact factor: 3.550
Authors: Y Merrouche; J M Extra; D Abigerges; R Bugat; G Catimel; E Suc; M Marty; P Hérait; M Mahjoubi; J P Armand Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1997-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ron H J Mathijssen; Jaap Verweij; Maja J A de Jonge; Kees Nooter; Gerrit Stoter; Alex Sparreboom Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-01-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: G G Chabot; D Abigerges; G Catimel; S Culine; M de Forni; J M Extra; M Mahjoubi; P Hérait; J P Armand; R Bugat Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 1995-02 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Smita S Joshi; Daniel V T Catenacci; Theodore G Karrison; Jaclyn D Peterson; Mark M Zalupski; Amikar Sehdev; James Wade; Ahad Sadiq; Vincent J Picozzi; Andrea Amico; Robert Marsh; Mark F Kozloff; Blase N Polite; Hedy L Kindler; Manish R Sharma Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2019-09-26 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Robert R McWilliams; Nathan R Foster; Michelle R Mahoney; Thomas C Smyrk; Joseph A Murray; Matthew M Ames; L Elise Horvath; Daniel J Schneider; Timothy J Hobday; Aminah Jatoi; Jeffrey P Meyers; Matthew P Goetz Journal: Cancer Date: 2017-05-10 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Giuseppe Toffoli; Manish R Sharma; Elena Marangon; Bianca Posocco; Elizabeth Gray; Quan Mai; Angela Buonadonna; Blase N Polite; Gianmaria Miolo; Gianna Tabaro; Federico Innocenti Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2016-08-09 Impact factor: 12.531