Literature DB >> 24958484

Understanding the relationship between tumor size, gland size, and disease aggressiveness in men with prostate cancer.

Michael A Kozminski1, Ganesh S Palapattu1, Rohit Mehra2, Jeffrey S Montgomery1, Alon Z Weizer1, Ted A Skolarus1, Brent K Hollenbeck1, David C Miller1, Chang He1, Scott Tomlins2, James E Montie1, Felix Y Feng3, David P Wood4, Lakshmi P Kunju2, Todd M Morgan5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between prostate gland and tumor volume in men undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer. We hypothesized that larger tumors within smaller prostate glands are associated with more aggressive disease characteristics.
METHODS: Records of patients undergoing RP from 2000-2008 at a single institution were reviewed retrospectively. The dominant nodule was considered to be the largest focus of cancer within the prostate, and the dominant nodule-to-prostate volume ratio (DNVR) was calculated according to the ratio of the dominant nodule volume to the gland weight. Cox regression was performed to assess the relationship between DNVR and both pathologic outcomes (Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment post-Surgical score) and biochemical recurrence (BCR).
RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 3.7 years, 174 patients (7.2%) suffered BCR. There was no linear correlation between tumor volume and gland size (R = -0.09). DNVR above the median (≥0.033 cc/gm) was closely associated with high clinicopathologic risk as measured by Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment post-Surgical score (hazard ratio, 35.53; 95% confidence interval, 14.42-87.55 for high- vs low-risk groups). In the univariable analysis, both tumor diameter and DNVR were associated with increased risk of BCR. However, in the multivariable model, only tumor diameter remained a significant predictor of BCR (hazard ratio, 2.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-3.91).
CONCLUSION: Increased DNVR appears to be a characteristic of aggressive prostate tumors, although it did not predict BCR in the present study. However, these data support the association between tumor diameter and BCR after RP for prostate cancer independent of other key clinicopathologic features.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24958484     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.03.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  5 in total

1.  Possible clinical implications of peripheral zone changes depending on prostate size.

Authors:  Joshua M Frost; Lisa A Smith; Pranav Sharma; Werner T de Riese
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Does an asymmetric lobe in digital rectal examination include any risk for prostate cancer? results of 1495 biopsies.

Authors:  Ömer Yilmaz; Özgür Kurul; Ferhat Ates; Hasan Soydan; Zeki Aktas
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

3.  Association of prostate volume with incidence and aggressiveness of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Shadi Al-Khalil; Christine Ibilibor; James Thomas Cammack; Werner de Riese
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2016-10-26

4.  Histological changes of the peripheral zone in small and large prostates and possible clinical implications.

Authors:  Jonathan A Guzman; Pranav Sharma; Lisa A Smith; John D Buie; Werner T de Riese
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2019-03-21

5.  Health-related quality of life and self-reported cognitive function in patients with delayed neurocognitive recovery after radical prostatectomy: a prospective follow-up study.

Authors:  Ursula Kahl; Sarah Callsen; Stefanie Beck; Hans Pinnschmidt; Franziska von Breunig; Alexander Haese; Markus Graefen; Christian Zöllner; Marlene Fischer
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 3.186

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.