Literature DB >> 24958283

Gains to species diversity in organically farmed fields are not propagated at the farm level.

Manuel K Schneider1, Gisela Lüscher2, Philippe Jeanneret1, Michaela Arndorfer3, Youssef Ammari4, Debra Bailey1, Katalin Balázs5, András Báldi6, Jean-Philippe Choisis7, Peter Dennis8, Sebastian Eiter9, Wendy Fjellstad9, Mariecia D Fraser8, Thomas Frank3, Jürgen K Friedel3, Salah Garchi4, Ilse R Geijzendorffer10, Tiziano Gomiero11, Guillermo Gonzalez-Bornay12, Andy Hector13, Gergely Jerkovich8, Rob H G Jongman14, Esezah Kakudidi15, Max Kainz16, Anikó Kovács-Hostyánszki6, Gerardo Moreno12, Charles Nkwiine15, Julius Opio15, Marie-Louise Oschatz3, Maurizio G Paoletti17, Philippe Pointereau18, Fernando J Pulido12, Jean-Pierre Sarthou19, Norman Siebrecht16, Daniele Sommaggio17, Lindsay A Turnbull13, Sebastian Wolfrum16, Felix Herzog1.   

Abstract

Organic farming is promoted to reduce environmental impacts of agriculture, but surprisingly little is known about its effects at the farm level, the primary unit of decision making. Here we report the effects of organic farming on species diversity at the field, farm and regional levels by sampling plants, earthworms, spiders and bees in 1470 fields of 205 randomly selected organic and nonorganic farms in twelve European and African regions. Species richness is, on average, 10.5% higher in organic than nonorganic production fields, with highest gains in intensive arable fields (around +45%). Gains to species richness are partly caused by higher organism abundance and are common in plants and bees but intermittent in earthworms and spiders. Average gains are marginal +4.6% at the farm and +3.1% at the regional level, even in intensive arable regions. Additional, targeted measures are therefore needed to fulfil the commitment of organic farming to benefit farmland biodiversity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24958283     DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Commun        ISSN: 2041-1723            Impact factor:   14.919


  6 in total

1.  Current approaches neglect possible agricultural cutback under large-scale organic farming. A comment to Ponisio et al.

Authors:  Jens Leifeld
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Safeguarding pollinators and their values to human well-being.

Authors:  Simon G Potts; Vera Imperatriz-Fonseca; Hien T Ngo; Marcelo A Aizen; Jacobus C Biesmeijer; Thomas D Breeze; Lynn V Dicks; Lucas A Garibaldi; Rosemary Hill; Josef Settele; Adam J Vanbergen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Many shades of gray-The context-dependent performance of organic agriculture.

Authors:  Verena Seufert; Navin Ramankutty
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 14.136

4.  Organic animal farms increase farmland bird abundance in the Boreal region.

Authors:  Andrea Santangeli; Aleksi Lehikoinen; Tanja Lindholm; Irina Herzon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Turnover and nestedness drive plant diversity benefits of organic farming from local to landscape scales.

Authors:  Romain Carrié; Johan Ekroos; Henrik G Smith
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2022-04-10       Impact factor: 6.105

6.  Organic Farming: Biodiversity Impacts Can Depend on Dispersal Characteristics and Landscape Context.

Authors:  Ruth E Feber; Paul J Johnson; James R Bell; Dan E Chamberlain; Leslie G Firbank; Robert J Fuller; Will Manley; Fiona Mathews; Lisa R Norton; Martin Townsend; David W Macdonald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.