| Literature DB >> 24958172 |
Nurrahmi Handayani1, Katja Loos2, Deana Wahyuningrum3, Muhammad Ali Zulfikar4.
Abstract
Immobilization of enzymes is one of the most promising methods in enzyme performance enhancement, including stability, recovery, and reusability. However, investigation of suitable solid support in enzyme immobilization is still a scientific challenge. Polyethersulfone (Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 24958172 PMCID: PMC4021891 DOI: 10.3390/membranes2020198
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Membranes (Basel) ISSN: 2077-0375
Figure 1MALDI-TOF spectrum of the synthesized PES.
Figure 2Structure of synthesized PES (upper) and aminated PES (lower).
Figure 3SEM image of membrane porosity with 40,000× magnification: (a) PES-10; (b) PES-10/D6; (c) PES-10/P4; (d) PESNH-10/D2/P5.
Figure 4SEM photograph of the cross section of (a) PES10/D6 and (b) PESNH-10/D2/P5.
Enzyme loading for all immobilized Mucor miehei lipases.
| No. | Sample Code | Enzyme Loading * (µg/cm2) |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | PES-10 | 679.09 ± 0.57 |
| 2. | ComPES-10 | 655.63 ± 0.57 |
| 3. | PES-10/D4 | 667.35 ± 0.57 |
| 4. | PES-10/D6 | 732.50 ± 0.57 |
| 5. | PES-10/P4 | 718.78 ± 0.57 |
| 6. | PES-10/P6 | 663.76 ± 0.57 |
| 7. | PESNH-10/D5/P2 | 785.76 ± 0.57 |
| 8. | PESNH-10/D5/P4 | 818.18 ± 0.57 |
| 9. | PESNH-10/D5/P10 | 799.82 ± 1.72 |
| 10. | PESNH-10/D2/P5 | 871.17 ± 1.15 |
| 11. | PESNH-10/D4/P5 | 850.89 ± 0.57 |
| 12. | PESNH-10/D8/P5 | 873.62 ± 0.57 |
* Standard deviation values were calculated from three replicated experiments.
Figure 5FT-IR spectra of PES–NH2 and lipases immobilized onto PES–NH2, the black line is spectra of PES–NH2 and the red line is spectra of lipase immobilized onto PES–NH2.
Hydrolytic activity test result of Mucor miehei lipases.
| Sample Code | % Yield * | Activity* (mmol
|
|---|---|---|
| Free | 27.93 ± 0.07 | 558.68 ± 1.23 |
| PESSynth 10P | 26.46 ± 0.06 | 529.27 ± 1.22 |
| PESSynth 10P 4D | 28.42 ± 0.06 | 568.48 ±1.22 |
| PESComm 10P | 27.14 ± 0.12 | 542.75 ± 2.44 |
| PESComm 10P 4D | 26.22 ± 0.07 | 524.37 ± 1.22 |
| PNH2 10P 4D 5P | 25.85 ± 0.07 | 517.02 ± 1.22 |
| PNH2 10P 8D 5P | 25.73 ± 0.07 | 514.57 ± 1.22 |
| PNH2 10P 5D 2P | 24.50 ± 0.06 | 490.07 ± 1.22 |
| PNH2 10P 5D 4P | 26.10 ± 0.06 | 521.92 ± 1.22 |
* Standard deviation values were calculated from three replicated experiments.
Figure 6Profile of reusability test for immobilized enzyme on both PES and PES–NH2 membranes (repeated four times).
Composition of casting solution in membrane fabrication.
| No. | Sample Code | % Polymer (w/w) | % DBP (w/w) | % PEG (w/w) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | PES-10 | 10 (PES) | 0 | 0 |
| 2. | ComPES-10 | 10 (PES BASF) | 0 | 0 |
| 3. | PES-10/D4 | 10 (PES) | 4 | 0 |
| 4. | PES-10/D6 | 10 (PES) | 6 | 0 |
| 5. | PES-10/P4 | 10 (PES) | 0 | 4 |
| 6. | PES-10/P6 | 10 (PES) | 0 | 6 |
| 7. | PESNH-10/D5/P2 | 10 (PES–NH2) | 5 | 2 |
| 8. | PESNH-10/D5/P4 | 10 (PES–NH2) | 5 | 4 |
| 9. | PESNH-10/D5/P10 | 10 (PES–NH2) | 5 | 10 |
| 10. | PESNH-10/D2/P5 | 10 (PES–NH2) | 2 | 5 |
| 11. | PESNH-10/D4/P5 | 10 (PES–NH2) | 4 | 5 |
| 12. | PESNH-10/D8/P5 | 10 (PES–NH2) | 8 | 5 |