Literature DB >> 24957408

Different stressors elicit different responses in the salivary biomarkers cortisol, haptoglobin, and chromogranin A in pigs.

S Ott1, L Soler2, C P H Moons3, M A Kashiha2, C Bahr2, J Vandermeulen2, S Janssens2, A M Gutiérrez4, D Escribano4, J J Cerón4, D Berckmans2, F A M Tuyttens5, T A Niewold6.   

Abstract

Most commonly, salivary cortisol is used in pig stress assessment, alternative salivary biomarkers are scarcely studied. Here, salivary cortisol and two alternative salivary biomarkers, haptoglobin and chromogranin A were measured in a pig stress study. Treatment pigs (n = 24) were exposed to mixing and feed deprivation, in two trials, and compared to untreated controls (n = 24). Haptoglobin differed for feed deprivation vs control. Other differences were only found within treatment. Treatment pigs had higher salivary cortisol concentrations on the mixing day (P < 0.05). Chromogranin A concentrations were increased on the day of refeeding (P < 0.05). Haptoglobin showed a similar pattern to chromogranin A. Overall correlations between the salivary biomarkers were positive. Cortisol and chromogranin A were moderately correlated (r = 0.49, P < 0.0001), correlations between other markers were weaker. The present results indicate that different types of stressors elicited different physiological stress responses in the pigs, and therefore including various salivary biomarkers in stress evaluation seems useful.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chromogranin A; Cortisol; Haptoglobin; Pig; Saliva; Stress

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24957408     DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2014.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Vet Sci        ISSN: 0034-5288            Impact factor:   2.534


  13 in total

1.  Salivary microRNAs are potential biomarkers for the accurate and precise identification of inflammatory response after tail docking and castration in piglets.

Authors:  Cristina Lecchi; Valentina Zamarian; Chiara Gini; Chiara Avanzini; Alessia Polloni; Sara Rota Nodari; Fabrizio Ceciliani
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  The Connection Between Stress and Immune Status in Pigs: A First Salivary Analytical Panel for Disease Differentiation.

Authors:  J Sánchez; M Matas; F J Ibáñez-López; I Hernández; J Sotillo; A M Gutiérrez
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-06-16

3.  Aggression and affiliation during social conflict in pigs.

Authors:  Irene Camerlink; Simon P Turner; Winanda W Ursinus; Inonge Reimert; J Elizabeth Bolhuis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Influence of different sample preparation strategies on the proteomic identification of stress biomarkers in porcine saliva.

Authors:  Ana Gutiérrez; José Joaquín Cerón; Ebrahim Razzazi-Fazeli; Sarah Schlosser; Fernando Tecles
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Effect of the needle-free "intra dermal application of liquids" vaccination on the welfare of pregnant sows.

Authors:  Déborah Temple; Damián Escribano; Marta Jiménez; Eva Mainau; José J Cerón; Xavier Manteca
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2017-04-04

6.  Periparturient Behavior and Physiology: Further Insight Into the Farrowing Process for Primiparous and Multiparous Sows.

Authors:  Sarah H Ison; Susan Jarvis; Sarah A Hall; Cheryl J Ashworth; Kenneth M D Rutherford
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-06-12

7.  Stability of selected enzymes in saliva of pigs under different storage conditions: a pilot study.

Authors:  Damián Escribano; María D Contreras-Aguilar; Asta Tvarijonaviciute; Silvia Martínez-Miró; Silvia Martínez-Subiela; José J Cerón; Elsa Lamy; Fernando Tecles
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 1.267

8.  Health Benefits of Supplementing Nursery Pig Diets with Microalgae or Fish Oil.

Authors:  Alison V Lee; Lan You; Se-Young Oh; Ziwei Li; Alexandra Code; Cuilan Zhu; Rebecca E Fisher-Heffernan; Timothy R H Regnault; Cornelis F M De Lange; Lee-Anne Huber; Niel A Karrow
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Positive Human Contact and Housing Systems Impact the Responses of Piglets to Various Stressors.

Authors:  Megan E Hayes; Lauren M Hemsworth; Rebecca S Morrison; Alan J Tilbrook; Paul H Hemsworth
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 10.  Causes, consequences and biomarkers of stress in swine: an update.

Authors:  Silvia Martínez-Miró; Fernando Tecles; Marina Ramón; Damián Escribano; Fuensanta Hernández; Josefa Madrid; Juan Orengo; Silvia Martínez-Subiela; Xavier Manteca; José Joaquín Cerón
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 2.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.