Literature DB >> 24957107

Assay discrepancy in mild haemophilia A.

Elina Armstrong1, Andreas Hillarp.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: There are three main methods used to assay factor VIII (FVIII) activity: the one-stage and two-stage clotting assays and the two-stage chromogenic method. The most commonly used assay for the diagnosis of haemophilia A is the automated one-stage FVIII assay. The classical two-stage FVIII assays are less frequently used. The chromogenic FVIII:C assay is a variant of the two-stage assay. It is easier to use and therefore used more commonly. Recently significant assay discrepancy has been recognised in the FVIII:C measurements in approximately one-third of mild haemophilia A patients. This so-called discrepant mild haemophilia A is characterised by a high ratio of one-stage/two-stage assay with one-stage FVIII levels that are typically more than double those of the two-stage coagulation assay. There are several mutations that destabilise the FVIIIa structure that can explain this result of a more pronounced decrease of the chromogenic FVIII:C activity compared with the one-stage activity. These mutations are clustered at the interfaces of the A1, A2 and A3 domains of the FVIII protein. The inverse discrepancy, where the one-stage assay gives lower FVIII:C results than the chromogenic assay, seems to be associated with mutations found close to important sites for thrombin cleavage or FIX binding. We are carrying out a study of mild haemophilia A samples from the Malmö Haemophilia Centre of families with a unique F8 genotype. The activity of FVIII will be measured using a chromogenic assay and two different one-stage assays. We hope to estimate the true size of assay discrepancy. AIM: This project will review assay discrepancy in mild/moderate haemophilia A and the risk of misdiagnosis. The overall aim is to estimate the size of the problem and to learn from the literature and experiences from our centre as well as to suggest recommendations on how to avoid misdiagnosis.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assays; discrepancy; haemophilia A; misdiagnosis

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24957107     DOI: 10.1111/ejh.12374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Haematol Suppl        ISSN: 0902-4506


  5 in total

1.  Clustered F8 missense mutations cause hemophilia A by combined alteration of splicing and protein biosynthesis and activity.

Authors:  Irving Donadon; John H McVey; Isabella Garagiola; Alessio Branchini; Mimosa Mortarino; Flora Peyvandi; Francesco Bernardi; Mirko Pinotti
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 9.941

2.  A field study evaluating the activity of N8-GP in spiked plasma samples at clinical haemostasis laboratories.

Authors:  Stefan Tiefenbacher; Wan Hui Ong Clausen; Martin Hansen; Rasmus Lützhøft; Mirella Ezban
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 4.287

3.  Comparison between coagulation factor VIII quantified with one-stage activity assay and with mass spectrometry in haemophilia A patients: Proof of principle.

Authors:  Anouk A M T Donners; Erik M van Maarseveen; Yrea R J Weetink; Mohsin El Amrani; Kathelijn Fischer; Carin M A Rademaker; Toine C G Egberts; Albert Huisman; Ruben E A Musson
Journal:  Int J Lab Hematol       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 2.877

4.  Cross-reacting Material-positive Hemophilia A Diagnosed in a Patient with a Spontaneous Thigh Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Tatsuya Saito; Jyunichi Mukae; Yosuke Nakamura; Hiroshi Inaba; Keiji Nogami; Takatoshi Koyama; Katsuyuki Fukutake; Koh Yamamoto
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 1.271

5.  Educational needs of hematologists and laboratory professionals regarding factor activity assays.

Authors:  Dorothy M Adcock; Mazi Rasulnia; Natalia Holot; David L Cooper
Journal:  J Blood Med       Date:  2018-04-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.