Literature DB >> 24956343

Intraoperative complications after 8150 semirigid ureteroscopies for ureteral lithiasis: risk analysis and management.

D Georgescu, R Mulţescu, B Geavlete, P Geavlete.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate semirigid retrograde ureteroscopy complications on a significant series of patients and to establish the factors associated with the occurrence of intraoperative complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 1994 and June 2013, 8150 semirigid ureteroscopic procedures for ureteral lithiasis were performed in 7456 patients. We used semirigid ureteroscopes(8 9.8F Wolf, 8 and 10F Storz, Olympus Endoeye digital 8.5 9.9F). Lithotripsy was done with pneumatic, electrohydraulic or Ho:YAG laser lithotripters. The preoperative parameters including gender, calculi location and size, impaction, degree of hydronephrosis, stone number and associated malformation as well as intraoperative aspects (stone extractors, fragmentation devices, operative time and surgeon experience) were evaluated in relation with complication rate.
RESULTS: The stone-free rate after a single ureteroscopic procedure was 90.9%. Intraoperative incidents occurred in 348 cases (4.3%). The overall rate of intraoperative complications was 2.8% (228 cases). These were represented by lesions of the ureteral mucosa (139 cases), perforation (58 cases), bleeding (16 cases), ureteral avulsion (3 cases) and extra-ureteral stone migration (12 cases). Statistical analysis shows a significant association between the complication rate on the one hand and stone size, location and impaction,operative time and surgeon experience on the other hand.
CONCLUSIONS: Due to technological advances and increased experience, the semirigid retrograde ureteroscopic treatment of ureteral lithiasis increased efficacy, while the incidence of intraoperative complications decreased. Most of these complications are minor and can be managed by conservative approach. Celsius.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24956343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurgia (Bucur)        ISSN: 1221-9118


  8 in total

Review 1.  Update of the ICUD-SIU consultation on stone technology behind ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Jonathan Cloutier; Ken Anson; Guido Giusti; Michael Grasso; Guido Kamphuis; Sven Lahme; Evangelos Liatsikos; Anup Patel; Margaret S Pearle; Luc Valiquette; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Immediate ileal ureter replacement for ureteral avulsion during ureterescopy.

Authors:  Mauro Ragonese; Nazario Foschi; Francesco Pinto; Luca Di Gianfrancesco; Pierfrancesco Bassi; Marco Racioppi
Journal:  IJU Case Rep       Date:  2020-08-18

3.  Study of ureteral and renal morphometry on the outcome of ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy: The critical role of maximum ureteral wall thickness at the site of ureteral stone impaction.

Authors:  Amit Kumar Mishra; Santosh Kumar; Lalgudi Narayan Dorairajan; Ramanitharan Manikandan; G Ramkumar; K S Sreerag; Jayesh Kumar Mittal
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2020-06-10

4.  Possible complications of ureteroscopy in modern endourological era: two-point or "scabbard" avulsion.

Authors:  Andrius Gaizauskas; Marius Markevicius; Sergejus Gaizauskas; Arunas Zelvys
Journal:  Case Rep Urol       Date:  2014-12-28

5.  Ureteroscopy: a population based study of clinical complications and possible risk factors for stone surgery.

Authors:  Magnus Wagenius; Mattias Rydberg; Marcin Popiolek; Andreas Forsvall; Johan Stranne; Adam Linder
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2019-09-02

6.  Boari-Flap reconstrution due to a total ureteral avulsion in a patient with ipslateral ureterolithiasis and contralateral renal nodule.

Authors:  Gualter Ferreira de Andrade Junior; Francisco Marcos da Silva Barroso; Roger Arthur da Cunha Alves; Jordi Gomes Marinho; Juan Eduardo Rios Rodriguez; Andre Luiz Campos Mancini
Journal:  Urol Case Rep       Date:  2020-01-14

7.  Is there any predictive value of the ratio of the upper to the lower diameter of the ureter for ureteral stone impaction?

Authors:  Deniz Abat; Ali Börekoğlu; Adem Altunkol; Ilgaz Çağatay Köse; Mehmet Salih Boğa
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2021-05-20

Review 8.  Complications of renal interventions: a pictorial review of CT findings.

Authors:  Jean S Z Lee; Jonathan Hall; Tom Sutherland
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2021-07-18
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.