Literature DB >> 24955723

The effectiveness of combined gating and re-scanning for treating mobile targets with proton spot scanning. An experimental and simulation-based investigation.

A Schätti1, M Zakova, D Meer, A J Lomax.   

Abstract

Organ motion is one of the major obstacles in radiotherapy and charged particle therapy. Even more so, the theoretical advantages of dose distributions in scanned ion beam therapy may be lost due to the interplay between organ motion and beam scanning. Several techniques for dealing with this problem have been devised. In re-scanning, the target volume is scanned several times to average out the motion effects. In gating and breath-hold, dose is only delivered if the tumour is in a narrow window of position. Experiments have been performed to verify if gating and re-scanning are effective means of motion mitigation. Dose distributions were acquired in a lateral plane of a homogeneous phantom. For a spherical target volume and regular motion gating was sufficient. However, for realistic, irregular motion or a patient target volume, gating did not reduce the interplay effect to an acceptable level. Combining gating with re-scanning recovered the dose distributions. The simplest re-scanning approach, where a treatment plan is duplicated several times and applied in sequence, was not efficient. Simulations of different combinations of gating window sizes and re-scanning schemes revealed that reducing the gating window is the most efficient approach. However, very small gating windows are not robust for irregular motion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24955723     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/14/3813

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  8 in total

Review 1.  Radiation oncology in the era of precision medicine.

Authors:  Michael Baumann; Mechthild Krause; Jens Overgaard; Jürgen Debus; Søren M Bentzen; Juliane Daartz; Christian Richter; Daniel Zips; Thomas Bortfeld
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 2.  Empowering Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Through Physics and Technology: An Overview.

Authors:  Radhe Mohan; Indra J Das; Clifton C Ling
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 3.  Tumour Movement in Proton Therapy: Solutions and Remaining Questions: A Review.

Authors:  Dirk De Ruysscher; Edmond Sterpin; Karin Haustermans; Tom Depuydt
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 4.  Particle therapy for non-small cell lung tumors: where do we stand? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Krista C J Wink; Erik Roelofs; Timothy Solberg; Liyong Lin; Charles B Simone; Annika Jakobi; Christian Richter; Philippe Lambin; Esther G C Troost
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Optimization of motion management parameters in a synchrotron-based spot scanning system.

Authors:  Jedediah E Johnson; Michael G Herman; Jon J Kruse
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Pencil beam scanning proton therapy of Hodgkin's lymphoma in deep inspiration breath-hold: A case series report.

Authors:  Karin M Andersson; Anneli Edvardsson; Annika Hall; Marika Enmark; Ingrid Kristensen
Journal:  Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-12-23

Review 7.  Management of Motion and Anatomical Variations in Charged Particle Therapy: Past, Present, and Into the Future.

Authors:  Julia M Pakela; Antje Knopf; Lei Dong; Antoni Rucinski; Wei Zou
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 8.  Future Developments in Charged Particle Therapy: Improving Beam Delivery for Efficiency and Efficacy.

Authors:  Jacinta Yap; Andrea De Franco; Suzie Sheehy
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 5.738

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.