| Literature DB >> 24955374 |
M K Daud1, Lei Mei2, M T Variath3, Shafaqat Ali4, Cheng Li2, M T Rafiq5, S J Zhu2.
Abstract
Chromium (Cr) is present in our environment as a toxic pollutant, which needs to be removed using phytoremediation technology. In present study, two transgenic cotton cultivars (J208, Z905) and their hybrid line (ZD14) were used to explore their Cr uptake and tolerance potential using multiple biomarkers approach. Four different levels of Cr (CK, 10, 50, and 100 μM) were applied. Cr caused a significant reduction in root/shoot length, number of secondary roots, and root fresh and dry biomasses at 100 μM. Cr accumulated more in roots and was found higher in hybrid line (ZD14) as compared with its parent lines (J208, Z905) at all Cr stress levels (10, 50, and 100 μM). Cr translocation was less than 1 in all cultivars. Ultrastructural studies at 100 μM Cr showed an increase in number of nuclei and vacuoles and presence of Cr dense granules in dead parts of the cell (vacuoles/cell wall). Malondialdehyde (MDA), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), total soluble proteins, superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), catalase (CAT), and glutathione reductase (GR) as a whole were upregulated with elevated levels of Cr. Higher Cr uptake by roots, accelerated metabolism, and Cr sequestration in dead parts of the cell indicate that these cotton cultivars can be useful for Cr accumulation and tolerance.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24955374 PMCID: PMC4053220 DOI: 10.1155/2014/975946
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Root growth responses of herbicide resistant transgenic cotton cultivar (J208) (a), insect resistant transgenic cotton cultivar (Z905) (b), and their hybrid line (ZD14) (c) under exceeding levels of Cr.
Growth performance of both transgenic cotton cultivars and their hybrid line under chromium stress.
| Variety | Growth performance | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cr levels ( | Length (cm/plant) | Biomass (g/plant) | Growth inhibition | ||||
| Root | Shoot | Fresh | Dry | Fresh biomass | Dry biomass | ||
| J208 | 0 | 35.83 ± 2.57a | 47.20 ± 3.93a | 8.32 ± 1.55a | 0.67 ± 0.23a | 0.00 ± 0.00b | 0.00 ± 0.00c |
| 10 | 31.37 ± 1.70b | 44.57 ± 2.29a | 5.21 ± 1.35b | 0.43 ± 0.22ab | 34.61 ± 24.51ab | 37.93 ± 20.69b | |
| 50 | 24.00 ± 2.00c | 34.43 ± 2.67b | 3.85 ± 1.74bc | 0.21 ± 0.00b | 49.59 ± 33.52a | 66.33 ± 10.48a | |
| 100 | 17.60 ± 2.75d | 30.00 ± 1.74b | 2.34 ± 1.06c | 0.19 ± 0.00b | 69.41 ± 20.37a | 69.54 ± 9.48a | |
|
| |||||||
| Z905 | 0 | 22.67 ± 2.52a | 30.20 ± 1.71a | 7.06 ± 2.16a | 0.50 ± 0.13a | 0.00 ± 0.00c | 0.00 ± 0.00c |
| 10 | 18.83 ± 1.76b | 24.57 ± 2.38b | 3.82 ± 1.47b | 0.35 ± 0.10ab | 45.88 ± 11.98b | 28.71 ± 18.05b | |
| 50 | 10.07 ± 0.90c | 22.17 ± 3.82b | 1.95 ± 0.77bc | 0.19 ± 0.10bc | 69.26 ± 16.39a | 62.29 ± 13.42a | |
| 100 | 6.67 ± 0.76d | 14.60 ± 1.22c | 0.78 ± 0.30c | 0.10 ± 0.05c | 87.76 ± 7.64a | 79.57 ± 8.04a | |
|
| |||||||
| ZD14 | 0 | 27.33 ± 2.52a | 41.57 ± 3.98a | 6.53 ± 2.10a | 0.45 ± 0.18a | 0.00 ± 0.00c | 0.00 ± 0.00b |
| 10 | 24.87 ± 3.80ab | 42.60 ± 2.85a | 3.66 ± 0.44b | 0.35 ± 0.10ab | 38.72 ± 25.55b | 16.26 ± 29.45ab | |
| 50 | 20.33 ± 2.52bc | 32.87 ± 1.21b | 2.40 ± 0.49bc | 0.27 ± 0.10ab | 59.05 ± 20.08ab | 32.88 ± 37.45ab | |
| 100 | 17.40 ± 1.51c | 27.50 ± 2.30c | 1.23 ± 0.50c | 0.17 ± 0.05b | 80.69 ± 7.92a | 58.25 ± 17.23a | |
Values are the means ± SD of three replications. Variants possessing the same letter are not statistically significant at P < 0.05.
Tolerance indices of both transgenic cotton cultivars and their hybrid line under Cr stress.
| Variety | Cr levels ( | Root length | Plant height | Root fresh weight | Root water contents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J208 | 0 | 1.00 ± 0.00a | 1.00 ± 0.00a | 1.00 ± 0.00a | 1.00 ± 0.00a |
| 10 | 0.88 ± 0.07a | 0.91 ± 0.06a | 0.66 ± 0.24ab | 1.00 ± 0.00a | |
| 50 | 0.67 ± 0.10b | 0.70 ± 0.04b | 0.51 ± 0.33b | 1.02 ± 0.05a | |
| 100 | 0.49 ± 0.06c | 0.57 ± 0.06c | 0.31 ± 0.20b | 0.99 ± 0.05a | |
|
| |||||
| Z905 | 0 | 1.00 ± 0.00a | 1.00 ± 0.00a | 1.00 ± 0.00a | 1.00 ± 0.00a |
| 10 | 0.84 ± 0.16a | 0.82 ± 0.10b | 0.54 ± 0.54b | 0.98 ± 0.00a | |
| 50 | 0.45 ± 0.05b | 0.61 ± 0.09c | 0.31 ± 0.31c | 0.94 ± 0.12a | |
| 100 | 0.30 ± 0.07b | 0.40 ± 0.06d | 0.12 ± 0.12c | 0.90 ± 0.13a | |
|
| |||||
| ZD14 | 0 | 1.00 ± 0.00a | 1.00 ± 0.00a | 1.00 ± 0.00a | 1.00 ± 0.00a |
| 10 | 0.92 ± 0.22ab | 0.98 ± 0.09a | 0.61 ± 0.26b | 0.98 ± 0.07a | |
| 50 | 0.75 ± 0.07bc | 0.77 ± 0.02b | 0.41 ± 0.20bc | 0.96 ± 0.11a | |
| 100 | 0.64 ± 0.05c | 0.65 ± 0.02c | 0.19 ± 0.08c | 0.91 ± 0.03a | |
Tolerance index of the above parameters was calculated as TI = mean values in treatment/mean values in control. Mean values of TI =/> 1 show the tolerance behavior of the cultivar, while mean values of TI < 1 show the susceptibility of the cultivar towards Cr stress. Values are the means ± SD of three replications. Variants possessing the same letter are not statistically significant at P < 0.05.
Cr concentration levels in roots and leaves and its translocation from roots to shoot in experimental cotton cultivars.
| Variety | Cr levels ( | Cr uptake (mg/gDW) | Translocation factor | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leaf | Root | |||
| J208 | 0 | 0.03 ± 0.01d | 0.06 ± 0.03d | 0.65 ± 0.40a |
| 10 | 0.64 ± 0.08c | 23.07 ± 2.92c | 0.03 ± 0.00b | |
| 50 | 0.92 ± 0.03b | 38.95 ± 4.45b | 0.02 ± 0.00b | |
| 100 | 1.08 ± 0.13a | 59.60 ± 0.00a | 0.02 ± 0.00b | |
|
| ||||
| Z905 | 0 | 0.05 ± 0.02d | 1.56 ± 0.61d | 0.03 ± 0.01a |
| 10 | 0.41 ± 0.07c | 646.60 ± 29.29c | 0.001 ± 0.00b | |
| 50 | 1.48 ± 0.32b | 1129.2 ± 105.98b | 0.001 ± 0.00b | |
| 100 | 1.97 ± 0.11a | 1318.6 ± 150.98a | 0.002 ± 0.00b | |
|
| ||||
| ZD14 | 0 | 0.04 ± 0.02d | 0.09 ± 0.03d | 0.37 ± 0.20a |
| 10 | 0.39 ± 0.05c | 39.56 ± 4.06c | 0.01 ± 0.00b | |
| 50 | 0.52 ± 0.06b | 55.07 ± 10.98b | 0.01 ± 0.00b | |
| 100 | 0.96 ± 0.00a | 111.44 ± 7.72a | 0.01 ± 0.00b | |
Values are the means ± SD of three replications. Variants possessing the same letter are not statistically significant at P < 0.05.
Figure 2Electron micrographs of herbicide resistant transgenic cotton cultivar (J208) ((a) (CK); (b) (100 μM Cr)), insect resistant transgenic cotton cultivar (Z905) ((c) (CK); (d) (100 μM Cr)), and their hybrid line (ZD14) ((e) (CK); (f) (100 μM Cr)) under exceeding levels of Cr. CW = cell wall; Pm = plasma membrane; Mc = mitochondria, N = nucleus; Nu = nucleoli; V = vacuole; ER = endoplasmic reticulum; ICS = intracellular spaces. Double arrows indicate Cr dense granules while single arrow shows rupturing of membranous structures.
Figure 3Contents of MDA (a), H2O2 (b) and total soluble proteins (c), activities of SOD (d), POD (e), CAT (f), APX (g), and GR (h) in roots of herbicide resistant transgenic cotton cultivar (J208), insect resistant transgenic cotton cultivar (Z905), and their hybrid line (ZD14) under exceeding levels of Cr.