Literature DB >> 2495499

Cost effectiveness of current approaches to the control of retinopathy in type I diabetics.

J C Javitt1, J K Canner, A Sommer.   

Abstract

Diabetic retinopathy is a leading cause of blindness among working age Americans. The epidemiology of diabetic eye disease has been well described in population-based studies and the effects of laser treatment have been tested in randomized controlled trials. The authors have designed a computer simulation model using the published reports of these studies to predict the medical and economic effects of applying currently accepted methods for the control of diabetic retinopathy to the population of type I diabetics. Recommendations for screening are taken from the Public Health Committee of the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Treatment recommendations and treatment efficacy are drawn from the reports of the Diabetic Retinopathy Study (DRS) and the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS). Costs of screening and treatment are drawn from published Medicare reimbursement data. Over a 60-year period, the model predicts that proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) requiring panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) will eventually develop in 72% of type I diabetics and macular edema will develop in 42%. If these treatments are delivered as recommended in the clinical trials, the model predicts a cost of $966 per person-year of vision saved from proliferative retinopathy and $1118 per person-year of central acuity saved from macular edema. This is only one seventh of the $6900 average cost of 1 year of Social Security Disability for those disabled by vision loss. Therefore, this model supports the use of federally funded eye care to prevent blindness in medically uninsured diabetics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2495499     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(89)32923-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  29 in total

1.  Automated localisation of the optic disc, fovea, and retinal blood vessels from digital colour fundus images.

Authors:  C Sinthanayothin; J F Boyce; H L Cook; T H Williamson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Costs of diabetes. A methodological analysis of the literature.

Authors:  E Pagano; M Brunetti; F Tediosi; L Garattini
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Glaucoma screening: too little, too late?

Authors:  A Sommer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Laser treatment of diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  P E Tornambe
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1992-10

5.  Prevention of diabetic blindness.

Authors:  E Stefánsson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Diabetic retinopathy: preventing blindness in the 1990's.

Authors:  E M Kohner; M Porta
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 10.122

7.  Farm tractors and mandatory roll-over protection retrofits: potential costs of the policy in New York.

Authors:  T W Kelsey; P L Jenkins
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Screening for diabetic retinopathy in James Bay, Ontario: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  David Maberley; Hugh Walker; Anita Koushik; Alan Cruess
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  Fadia T Shaya; Mohammad Aljawadi
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-09

10.  Pharmacologic therapies for diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema.

Authors:  Ehud Rechtman; Alon Harris; Hanna J Garzozi; Thomas A Ciulla
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.