Literature DB >> 24954984

Comparison between intra-venous versus intra-arterial heparin during transradial coronary artery catheterization.

Mohammed Almansori1, Shady Ouf1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Trans-radial coronary artery catheterization is gaining popularity, heparin has been proven to reduce the rate of radial artery occlusion, intra-venous or intra-arterial heparin have no effect on the radial artery occlusion, we investigate the effect of route of heparin administration on different procedure related parameters.
METHODS: We randomized 150 consecutive patients to receive intra-venous (75 patients) or intra-arterial (75 patients) heparin; the two groups were compared regarding different procedure related parameters.
RESULTS: The success rate was over 99% and rate of radial artery spasm was about 5%. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding the parameters tested.
CONCLUSION: The trans-radial angiography can be performed successfully in the Saudi population, Studies with larger sample size are needed to show a significant difference between intra-arterial and intra-venous heparin administration.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Angiography; Heparin; Radial

Year:  2014        PMID: 24954984      PMCID: PMC4062765          DOI: 10.1016/j.jsha.2014.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc        ISSN: 1016-7315


  11 in total

1.  Comparison of the effect of intra-arterial versus intravenous heparin on radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization.

Authors:  Samir B Pancholy
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Radial versus femoral approach for diagnostic coronary angiography in stable angina pectoris.

Authors:  P F Ludman; N G Stephens; A Harcombe; M D Lowe; L M Shapiro; P M Schofield; M C Petch
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1997-05-01       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Left radial approach for coronary angiography: results of a prospective study.

Authors:  C Spaulding; T Lefèvre; F Funck; B Thébault; M Chauveau; K Ben Hamda; Y Chalet; H Monségu; O Tsocanakis; A Py; N Guillard; S Weber
Journal:  Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn       Date:  1996-12

4.  A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the access study.

Authors:  F Kiemeneij; G J Laarman; D Odekerken; T Slagboom; R van der Wieken
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Outpatient coronary stent implantation.

Authors:  F Kiemeneij; G J Laarman; T Slagboom; R van der Wieken
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography.

Authors:  L Campeau
Journal:  Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn       Date:  1989-01

7.  Comparison of a priori versus provisional heparin therapy on radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary angiography and patent hemostasis (from the PHARAOH Study).

Authors:  Samir B Pancholy; Olivier F Bertrand; Tejas Patel
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Evaluation of a spasmolytic cocktail to prevent radial artery spasm during coronary procedures.

Authors:  Ferdinand Kiemeneij; Bhavesh U Vajifdar; Simon C Eccleshall; GertJan Laarman; Ton Slagboom; Ron van der Wieken
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Transradial coronary angiography and intervention.

Authors:  Waqar H Ahmed
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.484

10.  Coronary angiography from the radial artery--experience, complications and limitations.

Authors:  D J Hildick-Smith; M D Lowe; J T Walsh; P F Ludman; N G Stephens; P M Schofield; D L Stone; L M Shapiro; M C Petch
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 4.164

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.