Literature DB >> 24954791

Degarelix as an intermittent androgen deprivation therapy for one or more treatment cycles in patients with prostate cancer.

Laurent Boccon-Gibod1, Peter Albers2, Juan Morote3, Hendrik van Poppel4, Jean de la Rosette5, Arnauld Villers6, Anders Malmberg7, Anders Neijber8, Francesco Montorsi9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Guidelines for prostate cancer treatment suggest that intermittent androgen deprivation (IAD) can be considered for certain patients.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of degarelix as IAD for one or more treatment cycle(s) in prostate cancer patients requiring androgen deprivation. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This open-label uncontrolled multicenter study included patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >4 to 50 ng/ml or PSA doubling time <24 mo. Induction included 7-mo treatment. Off-treatment period started when PSA was ≤4 ng/ml and lasted up to 24 mo based on PSA and testosterone levels. Treatment was reinitiated when PSA was >4 ng/ml. INTERVENTION: Each induction period included a starting dose of degarelix 240mg, and thereafter 80mg once a month for 6 mo, followed by off-treatment periods. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary end point was time to PSA >4 ng/ml. Secondary end points were subgroup analysis of the primary end point, time to testosterone >0.5 and >2.2 ng/ml, quality of life (QoL), and sexual function during the first off-treatment period. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Of 213 patients in the first induction period, 191 entered the first off-treatment period, 35 patients entered the second induction, and 30 entered the second off-treatment period. Only two patients entered the third cycle. Median time to PSA >4 ng/ml and duration of first off-treatment period was 392 d each. Significant differences in time to PSA >4 ng/ml were observed between subgroups stratified by prognostic factors (previous curative treatment, cancer stage, PSA levels, and Gleason scores). Time to testosterone >0.5 and >2.2 ng/ml was 112 and 168 d, respectively. Change in QoL remained nonsignificant, and sexual function gradually improved during the off-treatment period. Adverse events were fewer during the off-treatment period and subsequent treatment cycles.
CONCLUSIONS: IAD with degarelix resulted in an improvement in sexual function commensurate with increased testosterone levels while PSA remained suppressed. The treatment for one treatment cycle or more was well tolerated. PATIENT
SUMMARY: Guidelines for prostate cancer treatment suggest that intermittent androgen deprivation (IAD) can be considered for certain patients. IAD with degarelix resulted in improved sexual function commensurate with increased testosterone levels while prostate-specific antigen remained suppressed. The treatment for one treatment cycle or more was well tolerated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT00801242.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Efficacy; GnRH antagonist; Intermittent androgen deprivation; Prostate cancer; safety

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24954791     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.05.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  7 in total

Review 1.  A meta-analysis of cardiovascular events in intermittent androgen-deprivation therapy versus continuous androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  C Jin; Y Fan; Y Meng; C Shen; Y Wang; S Hu; C Cui; T Xu; W Yu; J Jin
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 2.  Degarelix versus luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists for the treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Timothy N Clinton; Solomon L Woldu; Ganesh V Raj
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 3.889

Review 3.  Targeting signaling pathways in prostate cancer: mechanisms and clinical trials.

Authors:  Yundong He; Weidong Xu; Yu-Tian Xiao; Haojie Huang; Di Gu; Shancheng Ren
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2022-06-24

Review 4.  Intermittent versus continuous androgen deprivation therapy for advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Marlon Perera; Matthew J Roberts; Laurence Klotz; Celestia S Higano; Nathan Papa; Shomik Sengupta; Damien Bolton; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Monitoring PSMA Responses to ADT in Prostate Cancer Patient-Derived Xenograft Mouse Models Using [18F]DCFPyL PET Imaging.

Authors:  Jyoti Roy; Margaret E White; Falguni Basuli; Ana Christina L Opina; Karen Wong; Morgan Riba; Anita T Ton; Xiang Zhang; Keith H Jansson; Elijah Edmondson; Donna Butcher; Frank I Lin; Peter L Choyke; Kathleen Kelly; Elaine M Jagoda
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Effectiveness of GnRH Antagonists and Agonists in Patients with Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Zhenghao Liu; Chunguang Yang; Xing Zeng; Chunjin Ke; Jihua Tian; Zhihua Wang; Zhiquan Hu
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 7.  Progress in Clinical Research on Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor Antagonists for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Yi-Fu Liu; Sheng-Qiang Fu; Yu-Chang Yan; Bin-Bin Gong; Wen-Jie Xie; Xiao-Rong Yang; Ting Sun; Ming Ma
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 4.162

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.