Literature DB >> 24954642

The effect of three different head-neck positions on the average EMG activity of three important neck muscles in the horse.

K Kienapfel1.   

Abstract

The Knowledge of muscle activity in common head-neck positions (HNPs) is a necessary precondition for making judgements on HNPs. The aim of the study was to record the surface electromyography activities of important muscles of the horse's neck in various HNPs. The electrical activities of the m. splenius, brachiocephalicus and trapezius were recorded on both sides. Five horses, both with and without a rider, were examined in all three gaits on both hands in three different HNPs: a 'free' position, a 'gathered' (head higher, neck more flexed) position with the noseline in front of the vertical and a 'hyperflexed' position. Averages of ten consecutive gait cycles in each HNP were evaluated and compared by standard statistical methods. No difference between ridden and unridden horses could be detected. The m. brachiocephalicus was in the hyperflexed position in all gaits significantly (p < 0.01) more active than in the gathered and free position, which were not significantly different. By contrast, the m. splenius was in the hyperflexed position less active than in the free position (p < 0.02), in which it always showed the highest activity. In walking, the muscle activities in the free and gathered positions deviated significantly (p < 0.01). The m. trapezius was in the hyperflexed posture during walking significantly less active than in the free (p < 0.01) and gathered (p < 0.01) positions with the strongest activities in the free position. Again, the free and gathered positions differed significantly (p < 0.01). In trot, the same pattern occured, although the gathered and hyperflexed positions did not differ significantly. In the canter, the activities of the m. trapezius showed no differences between HNPs. In HNPs with the noseline in front of the vertical, the muscles of the topline (m. splenius, m. trapezius) are activated and trained. In the hyperflexed position, however, a major muscle of the lower topline (m. brachiocephalicus) is activated and trained. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition
© 2014 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EMG; HNP; Rollkur; biomechanic; head-neck position; horses; hyperflexion; physiology

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24954642     DOI: 10.1111/jpn.12210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl)        ISSN: 0931-2439            Impact factor:   2.130


  5 in total

1.  Detection of Horse Locomotion Modifications Due to Training with Inertial Measurement Units: A Proof-of-Concept.

Authors:  Benoît Pasquiet; Sophie Biau; Quentin Trébot; Jean-François Debril; François Durand; Laetitia Fradet
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  The effects of Kinesio Taping on the trajectory of the forelimb and the muscle activity of the Musculus brachiocephalicus and the Musculus extensor carpi radialis in horses.

Authors:  Antonia Zellner; Barbara Bockstahler; Christian Peham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Muscular tension as an indicator of acute stress in horses.

Authors:  Ellen M Rankins; Helio C Manso Filho; Karyn Malinowski; Kenneth H McKeever
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2022-03

Review 4.  Surface electromyography in animal biomechanics: A systematic review.

Authors:  Stephanie Valentin; Rebeka R Zsoldos
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 2.368

5.  Prevalence of different head-neck positions in horses shown at dressage competitions and their relation to conflict behaviour and performance marks.

Authors:  Kathrin Kienapfel; Yvonne Link; Uta König V Borstel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.