Dulce M Cruz-Oliver1, Theodore K Malmstrom2, Michael Roegner3, Nina Tumosa4, George T Grossberg2. 1. Division of Geriatric Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO. Electronic address: dcruzoli@slu.edu. 2. Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO. 3. Division of Geriatric Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO. 4. Division of Geriatric Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, St Louis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, St Louis, MO.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The Veterans Affairs Saint Louis University Mental Status (SLUMS) examination is a screening tool that has the sensitivity to detect mild neurocognitive impairment and dementia. This study explores patients' cognitive impairment trajectories based on the SLUMS examination score changes after 7.5 years. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: The Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center at the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC), St Louis, MO. PARTICIPANTS: A review of 533 charts indicated that 357 patients who had participated in the SLUMS examination validation study in 2003 were still alive. MEASUREMENT: Charts were screened for indicators of cognitive status in both 2003 and 2010 and interventions after baseline evaluation. RESULTS: The mean age of the 357 individuals in 2003 was 74, all were men, and 73% had a high school education or more. A total of 223 (62%) of the 357 completed the SLUMS examination at baseline and at the 7.5-year follow-up visit; of those, 33 (15%) progressed to mild cognitive deficit, 20 (9%) progressed to severe cognitive deficit, and 53 (24%) improved or reverted back to normal. Further exploration revealed that at least one reversible cause was identified for most (n = 36/53, 68%) of the reversions. The primary interventions that differentiated reversers from nonreversers were correction of visual loss (P = .005) and discontinuation of anticholinergic medications (P = .002). CONCLUSION: Cognitive improvement (reversion) as indicated by the SLUMS examination after 7.5 years was associated with the correction of some reversible causes. This stresses the importance of early detection and exclusion of reversible causes for persons screened for cognitive dysfunction using the SLUMS examination.
OBJECTIVE: The Veterans Affairs Saint Louis University Mental Status (SLUMS) examination is a screening tool that has the sensitivity to detect mild neurocognitive impairment and dementia. This study explores patients' cognitive impairment trajectories based on the SLUMS examination score changes after 7.5 years. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: The Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center at the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC), St Louis, MO. PARTICIPANTS: A review of 533 charts indicated that 357 patients who had participated in the SLUMS examination validation study in 2003 were still alive. MEASUREMENT: Charts were screened for indicators of cognitive status in both 2003 and 2010 and interventions after baseline evaluation. RESULTS: The mean age of the 357 individuals in 2003 was 74, all were men, and 73% had a high school education or more. A total of 223 (62%) of the 357 completed the SLUMS examination at baseline and at the 7.5-year follow-up visit; of those, 33 (15%) progressed to mild cognitive deficit, 20 (9%) progressed to severe cognitive deficit, and 53 (24%) improved or reverted back to normal. Further exploration revealed that at least one reversible cause was identified for most (n = 36/53, 68%) of the reversions. The primary interventions that differentiated reversers from nonreversers were correction of visual loss (P = .005) and discontinuation of anticholinergic medications (P = .002). CONCLUSION: Cognitive improvement (reversion) as indicated by the SLUMS examination after 7.5 years was associated with the correction of some reversible causes. This stresses the importance of early detection and exclusion of reversible causes for persons screened for cognitive dysfunction using the SLUMS examination.
Authors: John E Morley; John C Morris; Marla Berg-Weger; Soo Borson; Brian D Carpenter; Natalia Del Campo; Bruno Dubois; Keith Fargo; L Jaime Fitten; Joseph H Flaherty; Mary Ganguli; George T Grossberg; Theodore K Malmstrom; Ronald D Petersen; Carroll Rodriguez; Andrew J Saykin; Philip Scheltens; Eric G Tangalos; Joe Verghese; Gordon Wilcock; Bengt Winblad; Jean Woo; Bruno Vellas Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2015-09-01 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Owoicho Adogwa; Aladine A Elsamadicy; Emily Lydon; Victoria D Vuong; Joseph Cheng; Isaac O Karikari; Carlos A Bagley Journal: J Spine Surg Date: 2017-09
Authors: Michelle Trbovich; Terry Romo; Marsha Polk; Wouter Koek; Che Kelly; Sharon Stowe; Stephen Kraus; Dean Kellogg Journal: Spinal Cord Ser Cases Date: 2021-06-10