Literature DB >> 24953603

Anatomical eponyms, part 1: to look on the bright side.

Regis Olry1.   

Abstract

The use of eponyms in medical sciences generally, and in anatomy specifically, remains controversial. In principle, this discussion should have been concluded as far back as 1895 (publication of the first Nomina anatomica): all eponyms should have been removed from the anatomical vocabulary then. In practice, what was believed to be a mere formality proved much more difficult to apply. Most eponyms remain in current use; moreover, their number goes on increasing. Assuming that there's no smoke without fire, we wondered why it seems impossible to get rid of a specific kind of term. The aim of this article and its successor is to weigh up the pros and cons.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords:  anatomical vocabulary; controversial; eponyms

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24953603     DOI: 10.1002/ca.22426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Anat        ISSN: 0897-3806            Impact factor:   2.414


  1 in total

1.  An unusual example of eponymous confusion: ganglion of Meckel.

Authors:  Vatfa Büşra Emek; Mustafa Orhan; İlhan Bahşi
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 1.475

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.