Literature DB >> 24953205

A simplified clinical risk score predicts the need for early endoscopy in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Leonardo Tammaro1, Andrea Buda2, Maria Carla Di Paolo3, Angelo Zullo4, Cesare Hassan5, Elisabetta Riccio6, Roberto Vassallo7, Luigi Caserta8, Andrea Anderloni9, Alessandro Natali10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pre-endoscopic triage of patients who require an early upper endoscopy can improve management of patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. AIMS: To validate a new simplified clinical score (T-score) to assess the need of an early upper endoscopy in non variceal bleeding patients. Secondary outcomes were re-bleeding rate, 30-day bleeding-related mortality.
METHODS: In this prospective, multicentre study patients with bleeding who underwent upper endoscopy were enrolled. The accuracy for high risk endoscopic stigmata of the T-score was compared with that of the Glasgow Blatchford risk score.
RESULTS: Overall, 602 patients underwent early upper endoscopy, and 472 presented with non-variceal bleeding. High risk endoscopic stigmata were detected in 145 (30.7%) cases. T-score sensitivity and specificity for high risk endoscopic stigmata and bleeding-related mortality was 96% and 30%, and 80% and 71%, respectively. No statistically difference in predicting high risk endoscopic stigmata between T-score and Glasgow Blatchford risk score was observed (ROC curve: 0.72 vs. 0.69, p=0.11). The two scores were also similar in predicting re-bleeding (ROC curve: 0.64 vs. 0.63, p=0.4) and 30-day bleeding-related mortality (ROC curve: 0.78 vs. 0.76, p=0.3).
CONCLUSIONS: The T-score appeared to predict high risk endoscopic stigmata, re-bleeding and mortality with similar accuracy to Glasgow Blatchford risk score. Such a score may be helpful for the prediction of high-risk patients who need a very early therapeutic endoscopy.
Copyright © 2014 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical score; Endoscopy; High endoscopic stigmata; Upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24953205     DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2014.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Liver Dis        ISSN: 1590-8658            Impact factor:   4.088


  8 in total

Review 1.  Upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk scores: Who, when and why?

Authors:  Sara Monteiro; Tiago Cúrdia Gonçalves; Joana Magalhães; José Cotter
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2016-02-15

2.  Scoring systems for upper gastrointestinal bleeding: Which one scores better?

Authors:  Vinay Dhir; Rahul Shah
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-04

3.  Comparisons of six endoscopy independent scoring systems for the prediction of clinical outcomes for elderly and younger patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Yajie Li; Qin Lu; Mingyang Song; Kexuan Wu; Xilong Ou
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Prophylactic tracheal intubation for upper GI bleeding: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ashraf A Almashhrawi; Rubayat Rahman; Samuel T Jersak; Akwi W Asombang; Alisha M Hinds; Hazem T Hammad; Douglas L Nguyen; Matthew L Bechtold
Journal:  World J Metaanal       Date:  2015-02-26

Review 5.  Early enteral nutrition versus delayed enteral nutrition in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hongyan Zhang; Yu Wang; Shujun Sun; Xin Huang; Guangjie Tu; Jingxu Wang; Yun Lin; Haifa Xia; Yin Yuan; Shanglong Yao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Evaluation of Six Preendoscopy Scoring Systems to Predict Outcomes for Older Adults with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

Authors:  Yajie Li; Qin Lu; Kexuan Wu; Xilong Ou
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 2.260

Review 7.  Clinical Scoring Systems in Predicting the Outcome of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding; a Narrative Review.

Authors:  Hanieh Ebrahimi Bakhtavar; Hamid Reza Morteza Bagi; Farzad Rahmani; Kavous Shahsavari Nia; Arezu Ettehadi
Journal:  Emerg (Tehran)       Date:  2017-01-11

8.  The Prognosis Analysis of Liver Cirrhosis with Acute Variceal Bleeding and Validation of Current Prognostic Models: A Large Scale Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Yan Zhao; Mudan Ren; Guifang Lu; Xinlan Lu; Yan Yin; Dan Zhang; Xin Wang; Wenhui Ma; Yarui Li; Guohong Cai; Yiguang Lin; Shuixiang He
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-08-16       Impact factor: 3.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.