Literature DB >> 24953016

Opening Pandora's box: understanding the nature, patterns, and 30-day outcomes of intraoperative adverse events.

Michael N Mavros1, George C Velmahos2, Andreas Larentzakis2, Daniel Dante Yeh2, Peter Fagenholz2, Marc de Moya2, David R King2, Jarone Lee2, Haytham M A Kaafarani3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little evidence exists regarding the characteristics of intraoperative adverse events (iAEs).
METHODS: Administrative data, the American College of Surgeons - National Surgical Quality Improvement Project, and systematic review of operative reports were used to confirm iAEs in abdominal surgery patients. Standard American College of Surgeons - National Surgical Quality Improvement Project data were supplemented with variables including injury type/organ, phase of operation, adhesions, repair type, and intraoperative consultations.
RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-seven iAEs (187 patients) were confirmed in 9,292 patients. Most common injuries were enterotomies during intestinal surgery (68%) and vessel injuries during hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery (61%); 108 iAEs (48%) specifically occurred during adhesiolysis. A third of the iAEs required organ/tissue resection or complex reconstruction. Because of iAEs, 20 intraoperative consults (11%) were requested and 9 of the 66 (16%) laparoscopic cases were converted to open. Thirty-day mortality and morbidity were 6% and 58%, respectively. The complications included perioperative transfusions (36%), surgical site infection (19%), systemic sepsis (13%), and failure to wean off the ventilator (12%).
CONCLUSIONS: iAEs commonly occur in reoperative cases requiring lysis of adhesions and possibly lead to increased patient morbidity. Understanding iAEs is essential to prevent their occurrence and mitigate their adverse effects.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accidental puncture or laceration; Intraoperative adverse event; Outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24953016     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.02.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  5 in total

1.  Classification of Intraoperative Complications.

Authors:  Haytham M A Kaafarani; George C Velmahos
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Feasibility of expert and crowd-sourced review of intraoperative video for quality improvement of intracorporeal urinary diversion during robotic radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Mitchell G Goldenberg; Jamal Nabhani; Christopher J D Wallis; Sameer Chopra; Andrew J Hung; Anne Schuckman; Hooman Djaladat; Siamak Daneshmand; Mihir M Desai; Monish Aron; Inderbir S Gill; Raj Satkunasivam
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  'Never Events in Surgery': Mere Error or an Avoidable Disaster.

Authors:  Jitendra Kumar; Rajni Raina
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 4.  Comparative review of outcomes: single-incision laparoscopic total extra-peritoneal sub-lay (SIL-TES) mesh repair versus laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) repair for ventral hernia.

Authors:  Tingfeng Wang; Rui Tang; Xiangzhen Meng; Yizhong Zhang; Liangliang Huang; Aili Zhang; Weidong Wu
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-04-15

5.  Complex And Simple Appendicitis: REstrictive or Liberal postoperative Antibiotic eXposure (CASA RELAX) using Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) and Response Adjusted for Duration of Antibiotic Risk (RADAR): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Daniel Dante Yeh; Gabrielle E Hatton; Claudia Pedroza; Gerd Pust; Alejandro Mantero; Nicholas Namias; Lillian S Kao
Journal:  Trauma Surg Acute Care Open       Date:  2022-09-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.