Literature DB >> 24952706

Evaluation of sampling spacing in pharmacokinetic studies using six sigma method.

Tomasz Grabowski1, Anna Raczyńska-Pawelec, Marcin Starościak, Jerzy Jan Jaroszewski.   

Abstract

Key elements of pharmacokinetics (PK) studies include both, the number of sampling points (NSP) as well as the spacing between the sampling points (SSP). Optimization of the SSP is discussed in guidelines of all key regulatory agencies (RA). Those however, provide only very general rules on how to properly distribute the NSPs in proposed PK studies. Here we demonstrate that the six sigma (SX) method can be effectively used to assess the quality of SSPs. We have tested a modified SX method analyzing 466 PK profiles from 16 studies including a total of 368 healthy volunteers. Non-compartmental modeling was used to estimate PK parameters. The arithmetic means of minimum and maximum values of SX obtained for each subject in all studies were 1.97 and 3.83, respectively. The method described here allows comparing quality of studies performed at different centers, even if they cover different chemical entities. We propose that the SX values can be used to assess quality of PK studies, what is consistent with recommendations of the RAs.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24952706     DOI: 10.1007/s10928-014-9361-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn        ISSN: 1567-567X            Impact factor:   2.745


  8 in total

1.  Evaluating laboratory performance on quality indicators with the six sigma scale.

Authors:  D Nevalainen; L Berte; C Kraft; E Leigh; L Picaso; T Morgan
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.534

Review 2.  Creativity, innovation and lean sigma: a controversial combination?

Authors:  Craig Johnstone; Garry Pairaudeau; Jonas A Pettersson
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 7.851

3.  A six-sigma approach to stability testing.

Authors:  Karl De Vore
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2008-01-04       Impact factor: 3.935

4.  Sampling intervals verification in pharmacokinetics studies.

Authors:  T Grabowski; J J Jaroszewski; M Sasinowska-Motyl; M Bujalska-Zadrożny
Journal:  Drug Res (Stuttg)       Date:  2013-12-10

5.  Quality indicators and specifications for key analytical-extranalytical processes in the clinical laboratory. Five years' experience using the Six Sigma concept.

Authors:  Ma Antònia Llopis; Gloria Trujillo; Ma Isabel Llovet; Ester Tarrés; Mercè Ibarz; Carme Biosca; Rosa Ruiz; Ma Jesus Alsina Kirchner; Virtudes Alvarez; Glòria Busquets; Ma Vicenta Doménech; Carme Figueres; Joana Minchinela; Rosa Ma Pastor; Carmen Perich; Carmen Ricós; Mireia Sansalvador; Margarita Simón Palmada
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Using Six Sigma to improve once daily gentamicin dosing and therapeutic drug monitoring performance.

Authors:  Sean Egan; Philip G Murphy; Jerome P Fennell; Sinead Kelly; Mary Hickey; Carolyn McLean; Muriel Pate; Ciara Kirke; Annette Whiriskey; Niall Wall; Eddie McCullagh; Joan Murphy; Tim Delaney
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 7.035

7.  A case study: application of statistical process control tool for determining process capability and sigma level.

Authors:  Vikram Chopra; Mukesh Bairagi; P Trivedi; Mona Nagar
Journal:  PDA J Pharm Sci Technol       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr

8.  Design-for-Six-Sigma To Develop a Bioprocess Knowledge Management Framework.

Authors:  Beth Junker; Gargi Maheshwari; Todd Ranheim; Nedim Altaras; Michael Stankevicz; Lori Harmon; Sandra Rios; Marc D'anjou
Journal:  PDA J Pharm Sci Technol       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.