Literature DB >> 24952507

Scientific integrity in Brazil.

Liliane Lins1, Fernando Martins Carvalho.   

Abstract

This article focuses on scientific integrity and the identification of predisposing factors to scientific misconduct in Brazil. Brazilian scientific production has increased in the last ten years, but the quality of the articles has decreased. Pressure on researchers and students for increasing scientific production may contribute to scientific misconduct. Cases of misconduct in science have been recently denounced in the country. Brazil has important institutions for controlling ethical and safety aspects of human research, but there is a lack of specific offices to investigate suspected cases of misconduct and policies to deal with scientific dishonesty.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2014        PMID： 24952507     DOI： 10.1007/s11673-014-9539-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bioeth Inq        ISSN： 1176-7529            Impact factor:   1.352


  9 in total

1.  Scientific integrity, misconduct in science.

Authors:  Emilio Bossi
Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly       Date:  2010-04-03       Impact factor: 2.193

2.  [Between fetishism and survival: are scientific articles a form of academic merchandise?].

Authors:  Luis David Castiel; Javier Sanz-Valero
Journal:  Cad Saude Publica       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.632

3.  [Ethics relevance in Brazilian medical journals].

Authors:  José Tavares-Neto; Eliane S Azevêdo
Journal:  Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992)       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.209

4.  Susceptibility to fraud in systematic reviews: lessons from the Reuben case.

Authors:  Emmanuel Marret; Nadia Elia; Jørgen B Dahl; Henry J McQuay; Steen Møiniche; R Andrew Moore; Sebastian Straube; Martin R Tramèr
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications.

Authors:  Ferric C Fang; R Grant Steen; Arturo Casadevall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  RETRACTED: Retraction notice to "Non-local interactions and the dynamics of dispersal in immature insects".

Authors: 
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 7.  How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data.

Authors:  Daniele Fanelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Particokinetics: computational analysis of the superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles deposition process.

Authors:  Walter H Z Cárdenas; Javier B Mamani; Tatiana T Sibov; Cristofer A Caous; Edson Amaro; Lionel F Gamarra
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2012-06-01

9.  Ethics in scientific publications: the double copyright problem.

Authors:  Ivan D Miziara
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct
  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  In-house plagiarism and editorial unaccountability.

Authors:  Horacio Rivera; Ana Isabel Vásquez-Velásquez
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 1.352

2.  Integrity in Biomedical Research: A Systematic Review of Studies in China.

Authors:  Nannan Yi; Benoit Nemery; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Scientific misconduct: our first (known) case.

Authors:  Jacyr Pasternak
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2014 Oct-Dec

Review 4.  The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles.

Authors:  Felicitas Hesselmann; Verena Graf; Marion Schmidt; Martin Reinhart
Journal:  Curr Sociol       Date:  2016-10-13

5.  Essential signals in publication trends and collaboration patterns in global Research Integrity and Research Ethics (RIRE).

Authors:  A M Soehartono; L G Yu; K A Khor
Journal:  Scientometrics       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 3.801
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.