Literature DB >> 24951741

Metal-Backed Glenoid Components Have a Higher Rate of Failure and Fail by Different Modes in Comparison with All-Polyethylene Components: A Systematic Review.

Anastasios Papadonikolakis1, Frederick A Matsen2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Glenoid component failure is a common and serious complication of total shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate published evidence on whether metal backing lessens the rate of glenoid component failure.
METHODS: A comprehensive systematic review yielded twenty-one studies on radiolucency, radiographic failure, and revision after arthroplasty with metal-backed glenoid components and twenty-three studies with all-polyethylene components. Our analysis included data on 1571 metal-backed and 3035 all-polyethylene components. The mean duration of follow-up was 5.8 years in the studies with metal-backed components and 7.3 years with all-polyethylene components.
RESULTS: All-polyethylene components had a 42.5% rate of radiolucency compared with 34.9% for metal-backed components (p = 0.0026) and a 21.1% rate of radiographic loosening or failure compared with 16.8% for metal-backed components (p = 0.0005). However, the rate of revision was more than three times higher with metal-backed components (14.0%) than with all-polyethylene components (3.8%, p < 0.0001). Although 77% of the revisions of all-polyethylene components were for loosening, 62% of the revisions of metal-backed components were for other reasons, such as component fracture, screw breakage, component dissociation, polyethylene wear, metal wear, and rotator cuff tear (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The published evidence indicates that metal-backed glenoid components require revision at a significantly higher rate and for different reasons in comparison with all-polyethylene components. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Copyright © 2014 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24951741     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00674

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  24 in total

1.  One and two-year clinical outcomes for a polyethylene glenoid with a fluted peg: one thousand two hundred seventy individual patients from eleven centers.

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen; Joseph P Iannotti; R Sean Churchill; Lieven De Wilde; T Bradley Edwards; Matthew C Evans; Edward V Fehringer; Gordon I Groh; James D Kelly; Christopher M Kilian; Giovanni Merolla; Tom R Norris; Giuseppe Porcellini; Edwin E Spencer; Anne Vidil; Michael A Wirth; Stacy M Russ; Moni Neradilek; Jeremy S Somerson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  The arthritic glenoid: anatomy and arthroplasty designs.

Authors:  Nikolas K Knowles; Louis M Ferreira; George S Athwal
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

3.  Prospective midterm results of a new convertible glenoid component in anatomic shoulder arthroplasty: a cohort study.

Authors:  Petra Magosch; Sven Lichtenberg; Mark Tauber; Frank Martetschläger; Peter Habermeyer
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty in young patients with osteoarthritis: all-polyethylene versus metal-backed glenoid.

Authors:  M O Gauci; N Bonnevialle; G Moineau; M Baba; G Walch; P Boileau
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 5.082

Review 5.  [Shoulder endoprosthesis in the elderly : Hemiarthroplasty or total shoulder arthroplasty? Anatomic or reverse?]

Authors:  J Kircher
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 6.  Glenoid bony morphology of osteoarthritis prior to shoulder arthroplasty: what the surgeon wants to know and why.

Authors:  Lawrence Lo; Scott Koenig; Natalie L Leong; Brian B Shiu; S Ashfaq Hasan; Mohit N Gilotra; Kenneth C Wang
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  The ream and run: not for every patient, every surgeon or every problem.

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Total shoulder replacement using a bone ingrowth central peg polyethylene glenoid component: a prospective clinical and computed tomography study with short- to mid-term follow-up.

Authors:  Giovanni Merolla; Giovanni Ciaramella; Elisabetta Fabbri; Gilles Walch; Paolo Paladini; Giuseppe Porcellini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Porous metals and alternate bearing surfaces in shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Shannon R Carpenter; Ivan Urits; Anand M Murthi
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

Review 10.  Modern trabecular metal-backed glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty: What is the evidence? A systematic review.

Authors:  Michael-Alexander Malahias; Dimitrios Chytas; Lazaros Kostretzis; Angelos Trellopoulos; Emmanouil Brilakis; Emmanouil Antonogiannakis
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-09-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.