Literature DB >> 24951614

Radiologist-performed hand-held ultrasound screening at average risk of breast cancer: results from a single health screening center.

Jung Min Chang1, Hye Ryoung Koo2, Woo Kyung Moon3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound (US) screening is not currently recommended as a routine screening modality in the general population of average risk. The cancer detection yield and positive predictive value in an average risk general population who undergo breast screening by experienced radiologists is unclear.
PURPOSE: To determine the performance of screening breast US in women at an average risk for breast cancer undergoing breast screening by experienced radiologists.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study received institutional review board approval, and informed consent was waived. A retrospective review of our database revealed 1526 women who underwent prevalence screening US at a single health screening center and had negative findings on digital mammography (MG). The Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System (BI-RADS) final assessments of the breast US were analyzed retrospectively, with the reference standard defined as a combination of pathology and a 12-month follow-up. The cancer detection rate and positive predictive value (PPV2) of the biopsies were calculated according to breast density.
RESULTS: The average time to perform a screening US examination was 15-20 min. Of 1526 women, 1095 (71.8%) were classified as BI-RADS category 1 or 2; 340 (22.3%) were classified as category 3; and 91 (6.0%) were classified as category 4. Five malignant lesions were found in women with dense breasts. The overall cancer detection rate was 3.3, and the cancer detection rate for dense breasts was 5.1 per 1000 screens (4.1 per 1000 screens [heterogeneously dense breast], 7.7 per 1000 screens [extremely dense breast]). The PPV2 for biopsies was 5.3%.
CONCLUSION: The radiologist-performed screening US offered to women with an average risk and dense breasts can detect additional mammographically occult breast cancers. In screening US, a relatively high rate of BI-RADS category 3 and 4 lesions was observed. © The Foundation Acta Radiologica 2014 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Screening ultrasound; average risk women; breast cancer detection; dense breast; positive predictive value

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24951614     DOI: 10.1177/0284185114538252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  16 in total

1.  Growing BI-RADS category 3 lesions on follow-up breast ultrasound: malignancy rates and worrisome features.

Authors:  Su Min Ha; Eun Young Chae; Joo Hee Cha; Hee Jung Shin; Woo Jung Choi; Hak Hee Kim
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  BI-RADS 3 on Screening Breast Ultrasound: What Is It and What Is the Appropriate Management?

Authors:  Wendie A Berg
Journal:  J Breast Imaging       Date:  2021-08-15

3.  How can additional ultrasonography screening improve the detection of occult breast cancer in women with dense breasts?

Authors:  Parisa Pishdad; Ameneh Moosavi; Reza Jalli; Fariba Zarei; Mahdi Saeedi-Moghadam; Banafsheh Zeinali-Rafsanjani
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2020-07-13

Review 4.  Ultrasound as an Adjunct to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2016-07-01

5.  Chronological Trends of Breast Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Clinical, Radiologic, and Pathologic Perspectives.

Authors:  Si Eun Lee; Ha Yan Kim; Jung Hyun Yoon; Eun-Kyung Kim; Jee Ye Kim; Min Jung Kim; Ga Ram Kim; Youngjean Vivian Park; Hee Jung Moon
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Characteristics of breast cancer detected by supplementary screening ultrasonography.

Authors:  Hee Jung Moon; Eun-Kyung Kim
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2015-05-24

7.  Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 Lesions Detected on Whole-Breast Screening Ultrasound.

Authors:  Sang Yu Nam; Eun Young Ko; Boo-Kyung Han; Jung Hee Shin; Eun Sook Ko; Soo Yeon Hahn
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 3.588

8.  Application of the downgrade criteria to supplemental screening ultrasound for women with negative mammography but dense breasts.

Authors:  Soo-Yeon Kim; Min Jung Kim; Hee Jung Moon; Jung Hyun Yoon; Eun-Kyung Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Medical auditing of whole-breast screening ultrasonography.

Authors:  Min Jung Kim
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2017-02-16

10.  Screening Ultrasound in Women with Negative Mammography: Outcome Analysis.

Authors:  Ji-Young Hwang; Boo-Kyung Han; Eun Young Ko; Jung Hee Shin; Soo Yeon Hahn; Mee Young Nam
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.