Literature DB >> 24951606

Measuring the population impact of introducing stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer in Canada.

Alexander V Louie1, George B Rodrigues2, David A Palma2, Suresh Senan2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Cancer Risk Management Model (CRMM) was used to estimate the health and economic impact of introducing stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Canada.
METHODS: The CRMM uses Monte Carlo microsimulation representative of all Canadians. Lung cancer outputs were previously validated internally (Statistics Canada) and externally (Canadian Cancer Registry). We updated costs using the Ontario schedule of fees and benefits or the consumer price index to calculate 2013 Canadian dollars, discounted at a 3% rate. The reference model assumed that for stage I NSCLC, 75% of patients undergo surgery (lobectomy, sublobar resection, or pneumonectomy), 12.5% undergo radiotherapy (RT), and 12.5% undergo best supportive care (BSC). SABR was introduced in 2008 as an alternative to sublobar resection, RT, and BSC at rates reflective of the literature. Incremental cost effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated; a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 (all amounts are in Canadian dollars) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) was used from the health care payer perspective.
RESULTS: The total cost for 25,085 new cases of lung cancer in 2013 was calculated to be $608,002,599. Mean upfront costs for the 4,318 stage I cases were $7,646.98 for RT, $8,815.55 for SABR, $12,161.17 for sublobar resection, $16,266.12 for lobectomy, $22,940.59 for pneumonectomy, and $14,582.87 for BSC. SABR dominated (higher QALY, lower cost) RT, sublobar resection, and BSC. RT had lower initial costs than SABR that were offset by subsequent costs associated with recurrence. Lobectomy was cost effective when compared with SABR, with an ICER of $55,909.06.
CONCLUSION: The use of SABR for NSCLC in Canada is projected to result in significant cost savings and survival gains. ©AlphaMed Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost-effectiveness; Health policy; Microsimulation model; Non-small cell lung cancer; Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24951606      PMCID: PMC4122471          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0469

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  43 in total

1.  Bayesian estimation of cost-effectiveness from censored data.

Authors:  Daniel F Heitjan; Clara Yuri Kim; Huiling Li
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Surgery for early-stage lung cancer: post-operative 30-day versus 90-day mortality and patient-centred care.

Authors:  Sashendra Senthi; Suresh Senan
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Surgery versus SABR for NSCLC.

Authors:  Alexander V Louie; Sasha Senthi; David A Palma
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Probability of cancer in pulmonary nodules detected on first screening CT.

Authors:  Annette McWilliams; Martin C Tammemagi; John R Mayo; Heidi Roberts; Geoffrey Liu; Kam Soghrati; Kazuhiro Yasufuku; Simon Martel; Francis Laberge; Michel Gingras; Sukhinder Atkar-Khattra; Christine D Berg; Ken Evans; Richard Finley; John Yee; John English; Paola Nasute; John Goffin; Serge Puksa; Lori Stewart; Scott Tsai; Michael R Johnston; Daria Manos; Garth Nicholas; Glenwood D Goss; Jean M Seely; Kayvan Amjadi; Alain Tremblay; Paul Burrowes; Paul MacEachern; Rick Bhatia; Ming-Sound Tsao; Stephen Lam
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Cancer statistics, 2014.

Authors:  Rebecca Siegel; Jiemin Ma; Zhaohui Zou; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Radiation therapy for the treatment of unresected stage I-II non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Juan P Wisnivesky; Marcelo Bonomi; Claudia Henschke; Michael Iannuzzi; Thomas McGinn
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Lung cancer mortality among U.S. uranium miners: a reappraisal.

Authors:  A S Whittemore; A McMillan
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Comparative outcomes of elderly stage I lung cancer patients treated with segmentectomy via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus open resection.

Authors:  Cardinale B Smith; Minal Kale; Grace Mhango; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman; John P Mandeli; Juan P Wisnivesky
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 15.609

9.  Fallacy of the five-year survival in lung cancer.

Authors:  B J McNeil; R Weichselbaum; S G Pauker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-12-21       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Cost-effectiveness of stereotactic body radiation therapy versus surgical resection for stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Anand Shah; Stephen M Hahn; Robert L Stetson; Joseph S Friedberg; Taine T V Pechet; David J Sher
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  10 in total

1.  Additional data in the debate on stage I non-small cell lung cancer: surgery versus stereotactic ablative radiotherapy.

Authors:  Charles B Simone; Jay F Dorsey
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-08

2.  Surgery versus SABR for early stage non-small cell lung cancer: the moving target of equipoise.

Authors:  Houda Bahig; Hanbo Chen; Alexander V Louie
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  The OncoSim model: development and use for better decision-making in Canadian cancer control.

Authors:  C L Gauvreau; N R Fitzgerald; S Memon; W M Flanagan; C Nadeau; K Asakawa; R Garner; A B Miller; W K Evans; C M Popadiuk; M Wolfson; A J Coldman
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 4.  Stereotactic radiotherapy for early lung cancer: Evidence-based approach and future directions.

Authors:  Samer Chehade; David A Palma
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2014-12-12

Review 5.  SABR vs. Limited Resection for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Are We Closer to an Answer?

Authors:  Hanbo Chen; Alexander V Louie
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2016-06

6.  Curing Operable Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy: The Force Awakens.

Authors:  Shankar Siva; David Ball
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-03-16

7.  Cost-effectiveness of carbon-ion radiotherapy versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Shohei Okazaki; Kei Shibuya; Tomoyuki Takura; Yuhei Miyasaka; Hidemasa Kawamura; Tatsuya Ohno
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 6.716

8.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Oligometastatic Tumors versus Standard of Care.

Authors:  Adam J N Raymakers; David Cameron; Scott Tyldesley; Dean A Regier
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.677

9.  Is England closing the international gap in cancer survival?

Authors:  Sarah Walters; Sara Benitez-Majano; Patrick Muller; Michel P Coleman; Claudia Allemani; John Butler; Mick Peake; Marianne Grønlie Guren; Bengt Glimelius; Stefan Bergström; Lars Påhlman; Bernard Rachet
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy of 60 Gy in eight fractions is safe for ultracentral non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Dan Yang; Jianing Cui; Jun Zhao; Jing You; Rong Yu; Huiming Yu; Leilei Jiang; Dongming Li; Bo Xu; Anhui Shi
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 3.500

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.