Literature DB >> 24951483

Minimally invasive reconstruction of the lateral ankle ligaments using semitendinosus autograft or tendon allograft.

Xiangyang Xu1, Mu Hu2, Jinhao Liu2, Yuan Zhu2, Bibo Wang2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to retrospectively compare the therapeutic effect between semitendinosus autograft and tendon allograft for lateral ankle ligaments reconstruction.
METHODS: From September 2006 to June 2011, 68 patients (41 males, 27 females) with chronic ankle instability underwent anatomical reconstruction of the lateral ligaments using semitendinosus autograft (autograft group, 32 patients) or tendon allograft (allograft group, 36 patients) via a minimally invasive approach. All patients were followed up for at least 12 months. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale score (AOFAS score) and stress tests were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes. Operation time, time to heal and complications were also recorded.
RESULTS: Compared with allograft group, the average operation time was significantly increased (85.5 ± 11.5 minutes vs 58.1 ± 10.2 minutes, P < .0001), but the mean time to heal was significantly shorter (11.2 ± 4.1 months vs 13.5 ± 5.2 months, P = .0458) in the autograft group. Although the mean AOFAS score was significantly increased at the final follow-up in the autograft group (95.1 ± 7.5 vs 62.3 ± 8.2, P = .0001) and allograft group (94.8 ± 5.5 vs 60.2 ± 8.4, P < .0001), no significant difference in AOFAS was found between these 2 groups. Similarly, there was no significant difference in talar tilt or shift between autograft and allograft groups. In addition, no patients complained of weakness or disability at the donor site in the autograft group, while incisional swelling was observed in 4 patients in the allograft group, which was resolved via dressing change, oral use of indomethacin or dexamethasone.
CONCLUSION: Reconstruction of the lateral ankle ligaments using a semitendinosus tendon autograft and a minimally invasive approach was safe and effective for ankle instability with a relatively short time for healing and minimal donor site problems. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, comparative case series.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  lateral ankle instability; ligament reconstruction; semitendinosus autograft; tendon allograft

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24951483     DOI: 10.1177/1071100714540145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  17 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive surgical treatment for chronic ankle instability: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kentaro Matsui; Bernard Burgesson; Masato Takao; James Stone; Stéphane Guillo; Mark Glazebrook
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Bony landmarks available for minimally invasive lateral ankle stabilization surgery: a cadaveric anatomical study.

Authors:  Kentaro Matsui; Xavier Martin Oliva; Masato Takao; Bruno S Pereira; Tiago Mota Gomes; Jan Martinez Lozano; Mark Glazebrook
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Anatomy of anterior talofibular ligament and calcaneofibular ligament for minimally invasive surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kentaro Matsui; Masato Takao; Yuki Tochigi; Satoru Ozeki; Mark Glazebrook
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Arthroscopic suture-tape internal bracing is safe as arthroscopic modified Broström repair in the treatment of chronic ankle instability.

Authors:  Tekin Kerem Ulku; Baris Kocaoglu; Okan Tok; Kaan Irgit; Ufuk Nalbantoglu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  The calcaneofibular ligament has distinct anatomic morphological variants: an anatomical cadaveric study.

Authors:  Bruno S Pereira; C Niek van Dijk; Renato Andrade; Ricardo P Casaroli-Marano; João Espregueira-Mendes; Xavier Martin Oliva
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Evaluation modalities for the anatomical repair of chronic ankle instability.

Authors:  Pietro Spennacchio; Christophe Meyer; Jon Karlsson; Romain Seil; Caroline Mouton; Eric Hamrin Senorski
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  Clinical applications of allografts in foot and ankle surgery.

Authors:  Pedro Diniz; Jácome Pacheco; Miguel Flora; Diego Quintero; Sjoerd Stufkens; Gino Kerkhoffs; Jorge Batista; Jon Karlsson; Hélder Pereira
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Osteochondral autograft transplantation with biplanar distal tibial osteotomy for patients with concomitant large osteochondral lesion of the talus and varus ankle malalignment.

Authors:  Xingchen Li; Yuan Zhu; Yang Xu; Bibo Wang; Jinhao Liu; Xiangyang Xu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 9.  Anatomic stabilization techniques provide superior results in terms of functional outcome in patients suffering from chronic ankle instability compared to non-anatomic techniques.

Authors:  G Vuurberg; H Pereira; L Blankevoort; C N van Dijk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Early Versus Delayed Mobilization Post-Operative Protocols for Primary Lateral Ankle Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Matthew L Vopat; Alexander Wendling; Brennan Lee; Maaz Hassan; Brandon Morris; Armin Tarakemeh; Rosey Zackula; Scott Mullen; Paul Schroeppel; Bryan G Vopat
Journal:  Kans J Med       Date:  2021-06-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.