Literature DB >> 24951266

Monitoring patient-centered outcomes through the progression of breast reconstruction: a multicentered prospective longitudinal evaluation.

Li-Fen Chao1, Ketan M Patel, Shin-Cheh Chen, Hung-Bun Lam, Chia-Yu Lin, Hsueh-Erh Liu, Ming-Huei Cheng.   

Abstract

Studies have shown that having breast reconstruction has a positive influence on patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at the conclusion of treatment. However, no study has critically evaluated changes to these patient-reported outcomes during the process of undergoing breast reconstruction. This study was to prospectively evaluate changes to patient-centered metrics through the progression of breast reconstruction. An IRB-approved prospective, multi-institutional study was performed for all patients undergoing breast reconstruction between 2009 and 2011. The Breast-Q reconstruction questionnaire was used for evaluation of HRQoL and was administered at five intervals in the perioperative period. Longitudinal evaluation was performed to assess changes to HRQoL metrics during this perioperative interval. One hundred and ten patients were enrolled, and 100 patients (91.9 %) completed appropriate follow-up. Preoperative HRQoL scores were higher in patients electing to forgo reconstruction (P < 0.004), while postoperative HRQoL scores consistently deteriorated at multiple time points following mastectomy as compared to reconstructed patients. On subgroup analysis, results indicated lower initial HRQoL scores in delayed reconstruction (P < 0.05) as compared to immediate reconstruction. These scores did, however, merge at approximately 9 months postoperatively. Changes to HRQoL outcomes occur through progression of breast reconstruction. Within the first year of surgery, early decreases are mirrored by significant increases at later time points above baseline levels when evaluating most forms of reconstruction. Choosing against reconstruction will likely result in continued deterioration of HRQoL for patients undergoing cancer surgery, but steady improvements can be expected if delayed reconstruction is chosen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24951266     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-014-3022-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  17 in total

1.  Breast Cancer and Reconstruction: Normative Data for Interpreting the BREAST-Q.

Authors:  Lily R Mundy; Karen Homa; Anne F Klassen; Andrea L Pusic; Carolyn L Kerrigan
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 2.  Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) following mastectomy with breast reconstruction or without reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Leonardo Z Cordova; David J Hunter-Smith; Warren M Rozen
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-08

3.  National Breast Reconstruction Utilization in the Setting of Postmastectomy Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Shantanu N Razdan; Peter G Cordeiro; Claudia R Albornoz; Joseph J Disa; Hina J Panchal; Alice Y Ho; Adeyiza O Momoh; Evan Matros
Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 2.873

Review 4.  The BREAST-Q in surgical research: A review of the literature 2009-2015.

Authors:  Wess A Cohen; Lily R Mundy; Tiffany N S Ballard; Anne Klassen; Stefan J Cano; John Browne; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Breast Anthropometry-Results of a Prospective Study Among Indian Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Praveen Royal Mokkapati; Manoj Gowda; Suryanarayana Deo; Ekta Dhamija; Sanjay Thulkar
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-01-07

6.  Outcomes of immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction: Results of a multicenter prospective study.

Authors:  Alfred P Yoon; Ji Qi; David L Brown; Hyungjin M Kim; Jennifer B Hamill; Jessica Erdmann-Sager; Andrea L Pusic; Edwin G Wilkins
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 4.380

7.  Breast cancer treatment and survival differences in women in remote and socioeconomically disadvantaged areas, as demonstrated by linked data from New South Wales (NSW), Australia.

Authors:  Elizabeth Buckley; Elisabeth Elder; Sarah McGill; Zahra Shahabi Kargar; Ming Li; David Roder; David Currow
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-03-21       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Patient-Reported Outcomes after Irradiation of Tissue Expander versus Permanent Implant in Breast Reconstruction: A Multicenter Prospective Study.

Authors:  Alfred P Yoon; Ji Qi; Hyungjin M Kim; Jennifer B Hamill; Reshma Jagsi; Andrea L Pusic; Edwin G Wilkins; Jeffrey H Kozlow
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 5.169

9.  Patient Race and Provider Predict Patient Satisfaction Following Post-Mastectomy Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Ashkaun Shaterian; Jessica Gandy; Shadi Lalezari; Sarah Smith; Keyianoosh Paydar
Journal:  World J Plast Surg       Date:  2016-05

10.  Non-narcotic Perioperative Pain Management in Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction During an Opioid Crisis: A Systematic Review of Paravertebral Blocks.

Authors:  Hanae K Tokita; Thais O Polanco; Meghana G Shamsunder; Stefan Dabic; Vaidehi G Patel; Robert J Allen; Joseph H Dayan; Babak J Mehrara; Evan Matros; Jonas A Nelson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-06-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.