Literature DB >> 24951231

Subtype differentiation of renal cell carcinoma using diffusion-weighted and blood oxygenation level-dependent MRI.

Youn Ah Choi1, Chan Kyo Kim, Sung Yoon Park, Seong Whi Cho, Byung Kwan Park.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to evaluate the utility of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) MRI for characterizing renal cell carcinoma (RCC) subtypes at 3 T.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-seven patients underwent 3-T DWI and BOLD MRI. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC; × 10(-3) mm(2)/s) and rate of spin dephasing (R2*, which equals 1 / T2* relaxation time, or 1/s) values were measured in the three RCC subtypes and normal renal parenchyma, and the results were compared. Statistical analyses were performed using analysis of variance, Student t test, and ROC curve analysis.
RESULTS: Clear cell RCCs showed statistically significantly greater ADC values (1.81 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s) than did papillary (1.29 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s) and chromophobe (1.55 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s) RCCs (p < 0.01); however, no statistically significant differences between papillary and chromophobe RCCs were observed (p = 0.26). Chromophobe RCCs showed the greatest mean R2* (33.6 1/s) of the three subtypes (p < 0.01); however, no statistically significant differences between clear cell RCCs and papillary RCCs were seen (p = 0.48). Low-grade clear cell RCCs showed statistically significantly higher ADC value (1.97 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s) than did high-grade clear cell RCCs (1.66 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s; p = 0.021). For differentiating clear cell RCCs from non-clear cell RCCs, the AUCs of ADC and R2* values were 0.756 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s and 0.607 (1/s), respectively (p = 0.047): cutoff values of ADC (1.4 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s) and R2* (26.3 1/s) resulted in sensitivities and specificities of 85% and 73%, and 86% and 47%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: For characterizing RCC subtypes, DWI and BOLD MRI at 3 T may be useful, but the current technique of BOLD MRI seems to have a limited diagnostic accuracy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; blood oxygenation level–dependent MRI; diffusion-weighted imaging; renal cell carcinoma; renal neoplasms

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24951231     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.13.11551

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  8 in total

Review 1.  Review of renal cell carcinoma and its common subtypes in radiology.

Authors:  Gavin Low; Guan Huang; Winnie Fu; Zaahir Moloo; Safwat Girgis
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-05-28

2.  Predicting common solid renal tumors using machine learning models of classification of radiologist-assessed magnetic resonance characteristics.

Authors:  Camila Lopes Vendrami; Robert J McCarthy; Carolina Parada Villavicencio; Frank H Miller
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-07-14

3.  Role of Virtual Biopsy in the Management of Renal Masses.

Authors:  Alberto Diaz de Leon; Matthew S Davenport; Stuart G Silverman; Nicola Schieda; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Ivan Pedrosa
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Is low b-factors-based apparent diffusion coefficient helpful in assessing renal dysfunction?

Authors:  Jiule Ding; Jie Chen; Zhenxing Jiang; Hua Zhou; Jia Di; Shijun Xing; Wei Xing
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 5.  Role of Multiparametric MR Imaging in Malignancies of the Urogenital Tract.

Authors:  Alberto Diaz de Leon; Daniel Costa; Ivan Pedrosa
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.266

6.  Diagnostic test accuracy of ADC values for identification of clear cell renal cell carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mickael Tordjman; Rahul Mali; Guillaume Madelin; Vinay Prabhu; Stella K Kang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  The value of blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) MR imaging in differentiation of renal solid mass and grading of renal cell carcinoma (RCC): analysis based on the largest cross-sectional area versus the entire whole tumour.

Authors:  Guang-Yu Wu; Shi-Teng Suo; Qing Lu; Jin Zhang; Wan-Qiu Zhu; Jian-Rong Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Challenges of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Stefano Colagrande; Andrea L Inghilesi; Sami Aburas; Gian G Taliani; Cosimo Nardi; Fabio Marra
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.