Literature DB >> 24950669

Report of the NIH Task Force on Research Standards for Chronic Low Back Pain.

Richard A Deyo1, Samuel F Dworkin2, Dagmar Amtmann2, Gunnar Andersson3, David Borenstein4, Eugene Carragee5, John A Carrino, John Carrino6, Roger Chou7, Karon Cook8, Anthony DeLitto9, Christine Goertz10, Partap Khalsa11, John Loeser2, Sean Mackey5, James Panagis12, James Rainville13, Tor Tosteson14, Dennis Turk2, Michael Von Korff15, Debra K Weiner9.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Despite rapidly increasing intervention, functional disability due to chronic low back pain (cLBP) has increased in recent decades. We often cannot identify mechanisms to explain the major negative impact cLBP has on patients' lives. Such cLBP is often termed non-specific and may be due to multiple biologic and behavioral etiologies. Researchers use varied inclusion criteria, definitions, baseline assessments, and outcome measures, which impede comparisons and consensus. Therefore, NIH Pain Consortium charged a Research Task Force (RTF) to draft standards for research on cLBP. The resulting multidisciplinary panel recommended using 2 questions to define cLBP; classifying cLBP by its impact (defined by pain intensity, pain interference, and physical function); use of a minimum dataset to describe research participants (drawing heavily on the PROMIS methodology); reporting "responder analyses" in addition to mean outcome scores; and suggestions for future research and dissemination. The Pain Consortium has approved the recommendations, which investigators should incorporate into NIH grant proposals. The RTF believes that these recommendations will advance the field, help to resolve controversies, and facilitate future research addressing the genomic, neurologic, and other mechanistic substrates of chronic low back pain. We expect that the RTF recommendations will become a dynamic document and undergo continual improvement. PERSPECTIVE: A task force was convened by the NIH Pain Consortium with the goal of developing research standards for chronic low back pain. The results included recommendations for definitions, a minimum dataset, reporting outcomes, and future research. Greater consistency in reporting should facilitate comparisons among studies and the development of phenotypes.
Copyright © 2014 American Pain Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Low back pain; NIH Task Force; chronic low back pain; minimum dataset; research standards

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24950669     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  24 in total

1.  The Canadian minimum dataset for chronic low back pain research: a cross-cultural adaptation of the National Institutes of Health Task Force Research Standards.

Authors:  Anaïs Lacasse; Jean-Sébastien Roy; Alexandre J Parent; Nioushah Noushi; Chúk Odenigbo; Gabrielle Pagé; Nicolas Beaudet; Manon Choinière; Laura S Stone; Mark A Ware
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2017-03-10

2.  Essential literature for the chiropractic profession: Results and implementation challenges from a survey of international chiropractic faculty.

Authors:  Barbara A Mansholt; Stacie A Salsbury; Lance G Corber; John S Stites
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2017-08-02

3.  Insight into the genetic architecture of back pain and its risk factors from a study of 509,000 individuals.

Authors:  Maxim B Freidin; Yakov A Tsepilov; Melody Palmer; Lennart C Karssen; Pradeep Suri; Yurii S Aulchenko; Frances M K Williams
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 7.926

4.  In vivo fluid transport in human intervertebral discs varies by spinal level and disc region.

Authors:  John T Martin; Benjamin Wesorick; Alexander B Oldweiler; Andrzej S Kosinski; Adam P Goode; Louis E DeFrate
Journal:  JOR Spine       Date:  2022-04-23

5.  Lumbar intervertebral disc diurnal deformations and T2 and T1rho relaxation times vary by spinal level and disc region.

Authors:  John T Martin; Alexander B Oldweiler; Andrzej S Kosinski; Charles E Spritzer; Brian J Soher; Melissa M Erickson; Adam P Goode; Louis E DeFrate
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 2.721

6.  A magnetic resonance imaging framework for quantifying intervertebral disc deformation in vivo: Reliability and application to diurnal variations in lumbar disc shape.

Authors:  John T Martin; Alexander B Oldweiler; Charles E Spritzer; Brian J Soher; Melissa M Erickson; Adam P Goode; Louis E DeFrate
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  RASSF7 expression and its regulatory roles on apoptosis in human intervertebral disc degeneration.

Authors:  Zhi-Heng Liu; Jun-Li Huo; Zhi-Gang Wu; Zhen Sun; Feng Bai; Dino Samartzis; Benjamin Gantenbein; Shao-Di Fan; Hai-Qiang Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-12-01

8.  Physical, Emotional, and Social Impacts of Restricting Back Pain in Older Adults: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Una E Makris; Robin T Higashi; Emily G Marks; Liana Fraenkel; Thomas M Gill; Janna L Friedly; M Carrington Reid
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 3.750

9.  Patient Priority Weighting of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire Does Not Change Results of the Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injections for Spinal Stenosis Trial.

Authors:  Una E Makris; Todd C Edwards; Danielle C Lavallee; Zoya Bauer; Bryan A Comstock; Jeffrey G Jarvik; Donald L Patrick; Mahshid Lotfi; Janna L Friedly
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 3.241

10.  In vivo relationships between lumbar facet joint and intervertebral disc composition and diurnal deformation.

Authors:  Alexander B Oldweiler; John T Martin
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 2.034

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.