Literature DB >> 24949604

Patient tolerability of bowel preparation is associated with polyp detection rate during colonoscopy.

Edward W Holt1, Kidist K Yimam2, Hanley Ma3, Richard E Shaw4, Richard A Sundberg5, Michael S Verhille5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: A number of factors have been identified that influence the yield of screening colonoscopy. The perceived tolerability of bowel preparation has not been studied as a predictor of quality outcomes in colonoscopy. We aimed to characterize the association between patient-perceived tolerability of bowel preparation and polyp detection during colonoscopy.
METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional cohort study of 413 consecutive adult patients presenting for outpatient colonoscopy at two outpatient endoscopy centers at our institution. We developed a standardized questionnaire to assess the patient's experience with bowel preparation. Bowel preparation quality was measured using the validated Ottawa scale and colonoscopic findings were recorded for each patient. The primary outcome was polyp detection and the secondary outcome was the quality of bowel preparation.
RESULTS: Patient-reported clarity of effluent during bowel preparation correlated poorly with Ottawa score during colonoscopy, ĸ=0.15. Female gender was an independent risk factor for a poorly tolerated bowel prep (OR 3.93, 95% CI 2.30 - 6.72, p<0.001). Report of a poorly tolerated bowel prep was independently associated with the primary outcome, polyp detection (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.18 - 0.84, p=0.02) and also with the secondary outcome, lower quality bowel preparation (OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.17 - 4.9, p=0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: A patient-perceived negative experience with bowel preparation independently predicted both a lower quality bowel preparation and a lower rate of polyp of detection. Assessment of the tolerability of bowel preparation before colonoscopy may be a clinically useful predictor of quality outcomes during colonoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24949604     DOI: 10.15403/jgld.2014.1121.232.ewh1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointestin Liver Dis        ISSN: 1841-8724            Impact factor:   2.008


  12 in total

Review 1.  Bowel cleansing before colonoscopy: Balancing efficacy, safety, cost and patient tolerance.

Authors:  Nicole M Harrison; Michael C Hjelkrem
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-01-10

2.  Can a 1-day clear liquid diet with a split -dose polyethylene glycol overcome conventional practice patterns during the preparation for screening colonoscopy?

Authors:  Diğdem Özer Etik; Nuretdin Suna; Cemre Gündüz; Ahmet Bostan; Alperen Özdemir; Bade Yağmur Gürel; Ezgi Yenişekerci; Ahmet Sedat Boyacıoğlu
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.852

3.  Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Bowel Preparation on Adenoma Detection: Early Adenomas Affected Stronger than Advanced Adenomas.

Authors:  Michael C Sulz; Arne Kröger; Meher Prakash; Christine N Manser; Henriette Heinrich; Benjamin Misselwitz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Real-world comparison of the effectiveness and safety of different bowel preparation agents.

Authors:  Naomi C Sacks; Abhishek Sharma; Philip L Cyr; Gerald Bertiger; David N Dahdal; Stuart P Brogadir
Journal:  Clin Exp Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-08-16

5.  Randomized Clinical Trial: A Normocaloric Low-Fiber Diet the Day Before Colonoscopy Is the Most Effective Approach to Bowel Preparation in Colorectal Cancer Screening Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Marco A Alvarez-Gonzalez; Miguel A Pantaleon; Juana A Flores-Le Roux; Diana Zaffalon; Jaume Amorós; Xavier Bessa; Agustin Seoane; Juan Pedro-Botet
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Efficacy and safety of a ready-to-drink bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial.

Authors:  Lawrence Hookey; Gerald Bertiger; Kenneth Lee Johnson; Julia Ayala; Yodit Seifu; Stuart P Brogadir
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-05-19       Impact factor: 4.409

7.  Safety and efficacy of sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, and citric acid bowel preparation in patients with baseline renal impairment or diabetes: subanalysis of a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Gautam N Mankaney; Masakazu Ando; David N Dahdal; Carol A Burke
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 4.409

8.  Split- versus single-dose preparation tolerability in a multiethnic population: decreased side effects but greater social barriers.

Authors:  Gabriel Perreault; Adam Goodman; Sebastian Larion; Ahana Sen; Kirsten Quiles; Michael Poles; Renee Williams
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-03-28

9.  A European, multicentre, observational, post-authorisation safety study of oral sulphate solution: compliance and safety.

Authors:  Jaroslaw Regula; Manon C W Spaander; Stepan Suchanek; Anne Kornowski; Valerie Perrot; Wolfgang Fischbach
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2020-02-21

10.  Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a ready-to-drink bowel preparation: subanalysis by age from a phase III, assessor-blinded study.

Authors:  Lawrence Hookey; Gerald Bertiger; Kenneth Lee Johnson; Mena Boules; Masakazu Ando; David N Dahdal
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 4.409

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.