Literature DB >> 24949445

The analysis of genetic aberrations in children with inherited neurometabolic and neurodevelopmental disorders.

Krystyna Szymańska1, Krzysztof Szczałuba2, Agnieszka Lugowska3, Ewa Obersztyn4, Marek Radkowski5, Beata A Nowakowska4, Katarzyna Kuśmierska6, Jolanta Tryfon7, Urszula Demkow6.   

Abstract

Inherited encephalopathies include a broad spectrum of heterogeneous disorders. To provide a correct diagnosis, an integrated approach including genetic testing is warranted. We report seven patients with difficult to diagnose inborn paediatric encephalopathies. The diagnosis could not be attained only by means of clinical and laboratory investigations and MRI. Additional genetic testing was required. Cytogenetics, PCR based tests, and array-based comparative genome hybridization were performed. In 4 patients with impaired language abilities we found the presence of microduplication in the region 16q23.1 affecting two dose-sensitive genes: WWOX (OMIM 605131) and MAF (OMIM 177075) (1 case), an interstitial deletion of the 17p11.2 region (2 patients further diagnosed as Smith-Magenis syndrome), and deletion encompassing first three exons of Myocyte Enhancer Factor gene 2MEF2C (1 case). The two other cases represented progressing dystonia. Characteristic GAG deletion in DYT1 consistently with the diagnosis of torsion dystonia was confirmed in 1 case. Last enrolled patient presented with clinical picture consistent with Krabbe disease confirmed by finding of two pathogenic variants of GALC gene and the absence of mutations in PSAP. The integrated diagnostic approach including genetic testing in selected examples of complicated hereditary diseases of the brain is largely discussed in this paper.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24949445      PMCID: PMC4052700          DOI: 10.1155/2014/424796

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Res Int            Impact factor:   3.411


1. Introduction

Neurometabolic and neurodevelopmental disorders have complex behavioural and cognitive phenotypes and in some cases may cause diagnostic dilemmas. To provide a diagnosis of these challenging medical conditions the patient has to be subjected to an integrated set of clinical, imaging, and laboratory analyses [1-3]. Combining extensive clinical workup with neuroimaging and sophisticated biochemical testing is essential to reach an accurate diagnosis, but some cases still remain unresolved. The analysis of data from broad patient phenotyping, together with genetic testing results, is warranted to attain a diagnosis in difficult cases. Genetic testing provides the final confirmation of clinical suspicions or constitutes an essential addition to prior examinations performed to reach a clinical diagnosis [4, 5]. In the latter case, both normal and abnormal results of such analyses can be of potential value to the clinician. Sometimes, genetic testing may provide completely new, important information about the complex human cognitive functions, including language development. A range of molecular genetic techniques, such as array comparative genomic hybridization, the identification of copy number variations, and in the future sequencing of genes, can support the clinical diagnosis and serve as a rich resource of the knowledge about disease mechanisms [4-6]. The aim of the current study was to analyse the genetic etiologies of congenital disorders of the central nervous system in children.

2. Patients and Methods

Seven patients from Polish families with inborn paediatric encephalopathies were retrospectively enrolled. The patients were categorized into 2 subgroups: first group (4 children) with nonprogressive neurodevelopmental disorders and the second group of 3 children with progressive neurological process. The depiction of specific entities only by means of clinical and biochemical analysis was difficult in all patients. Additional genetic testing was required in all cases either to fulfil the criteria of a defined genetic syndrome or to associate known phenotype with a given variant. All patients underwent detailed examination using an assessment protocol based on a multidisciplinary approach and administered by a child neurologist experienced in developmental disorders. Clinical investigations included family history and medical records of the child's pre- and postnatal period. All children were subjected to an in-depth analysis of the developmental phenotype—motor patterns in terms of gross and fine motor skills and motor functions, social relationships, receptive and expressive language development, behavioural and emotional regulation (mood regulation, attention, sleep/arousal, and feeding behaviour), and cognitive development evaluation. All subjects have undergone detailed neurological examination and have been assessed by psychologists. The clinical characteristics of all the enrolled patients are presented in Table 1.
Table 1

The clinical characteristics of enrolled subjects.

Patient number, sex/age, family history (FH)Course of pregnancy, perinatal period (PP)First symptomsAge at the time of diagnosisDysmorphic featuresClinical symptoms
Patient 1, female 18 yrs, FH-negativePremature uterine contractions, PP-uneventful2 yr develop mental delay16 yryesDysmorphic features; convergent strabismus of the left eye, hirsutism; scoliosis; epilepsy—valproic acid resulted in a complete EEG normalization; simple stereotypic movements of the upper limbs

Patient 2, male 7 yrs, FH-negativePremature uterine contractions, PP-uneventful1 modysmorphic features1.8 yryesDysmorphic features; neonatal oedema of the legs, cryptorchidism, brachydactyly; short stature; pronounced hypotonia; gastroesophageal reflux;severe sleep disturbances; severe autoagression, aggression, inadequate long temper tantrums, and stereotypic movements

Patient 3, female 6 yrs,FH-negativeGestational diabetes, PP-uneventful1 modysmorphic features2 yryesDysmorphic features; poor suck, hypoacusia-cochlear implant, significant hypotonia, no sleep disturbances, cheerful, without aggression or autoagression

Patient 4, male 7.7 yrs,FH-negativeMother's hyperthyroidism andtoxoplasmosis, birth at 35 w., 2480 g10 p. Apgar2 moabnormal movements2.10 yryesDysmorphic features, vertical and horizontal nystagmus up to 5 mo, global hypotonia, ataxia, decomposition of the movement.Obligatory mirror movement of upper limbs up to 3–5 yrs, exaggerated startle for unexpected stimuli with head retraction and trunk retropulsion and tremor of stiff limbs; decreased pain sensation.Epilepsy improvement after lamotrigine therapy.

Patient 5, male 21 yrs,FH-negativeNo foetal or perinatal problems5 yr dystonia8 yrnoMotor deterioration, dystonia; 8 yr—only slight voluntary movements of the left upper limb, forced posture, increased muscle tone (rigidity), deep tendon reflexes symmetrical, bilateral dorsal hallux sign; treatment with l-dopa led to deterioration; improvement after bilateral deep brain stimulation of the internal pallidum

Patient 6, female 26 yrs,FH-negative No foetal or perinatal problems4 yr dystonia13 yrnoSince 4-5 years of age she began falling and her gait was compromised.Dystonia; remission after l-dopa therapy

Patient 7, male, died at 15 mo,FH-negativeNo foetal or perinatal problemsBefore 6 motetraparesis 13 monoMotor deterioration; tetraparesis spastica
The developmental and intellectual characteristics of all the enrolled patients are presented in Table 2.
Table 2

The developmental and intellectual characteristics of enrolled patients.

Patient numberDevelopment of gross motor skillsDevelopment of fine motor skillsSpeech and language developmentIntellectual functioningAutistic features
Patient 1Abnormal motor coordinationSignificant deficits in praxis and visual-motor coordinationSpeech, especially active, not developed (single words or phrases, often the first syllable instead of the full word). Oral dyspraxia.6 yr—nonverbal Leiter scale IQ-75; 11 yr and 13 yr—nonverbal scale of the WISC-R test IQ 52; 17 yr—nonverbal scale of the WISC-R test IQ 42no

Patient 2Gross motor function-clumsy, probably partly due to significant hypotoniaFine motor skills-retarded: at age of 3 developed the pincer graspActive and passive speech delayed.At age of 3—a few sounds (not naming objects, not imitating any sounds or words), communication using gestures.Mental retardation with autistic features; symbolic play absent.yes

Patient 3Walked alone at the age of 26 mo.AbnormalDeficits of speech connected with hypoacusia and defective articulationCognitive development at 2 yr corresponding with the chronological age; symbolic play was present. 5 yr—nonverbal Leiter scale IQ-99no

Patient 4Began to walk alone in the third year of life-shaky, wide-based stance and gait“Jerky movements” with reduced complexity, variability, and fluency.Up to 5 yr of age no pincer grasp.7 yr—total lack of spoken language, reacted to very simple commands.ASD with profound mental retardationProfound

Patient 5Dystonia at 5 yrDystonia at 5 yrNormalCognitive functions normalno

Patient 6Dystonia at 4 yrDystonia at 4 yrNormalCognitive functions normalno

Patient 7Abnormal due to tetraparesis spasticaAbnormal due to tetraparesis spasticaLack of developmentLack of developmentno
Routine haematology and biochemistry including glucose, ammonia, lactate, and thyroid function tests in plasma were performed. Neuroimaging tests including brain MRI and awake and asleep electroencephalogram were performed in every case. If the patient history and clinical signs, as well as MRI abnormalities, indicated a neurometabolic or neurodegenerative disease, a battery of specific neurometabolic and genetic tests was performed. Depending on the clinical picture, biochemical diagnostics included serum, cerebrospinal fluid and urine amino acids, acylcarnitines analyses in dried blood spot by tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS), urine organic acids analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (GC/MS), lysosomal enzymes activities, urinary oligosaccharides and glycosaminoglycans, plasma ceruloplasmin, biogenic amines metabolites in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and pterins in urine. The results of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), electroencephalography (EEG), and metabolic testing are shown in Table 3.
Table 3

The results of MRI imaging, EEG, and metabolic testing in all enrolled subjects.

Patient numberBrain ultrasoundBrain MRIEEGBiochemical diagnostics tests abnormalities
Patient 1Not performedAt the age of 5 yr T2-hyperintense changes of the periventricular white matter around the centre of the body of the lateral ventricles.18 yr—normalGeneralized spikes and spike-and-wave discharges (2.5–5 Hz) as well as focal spikesNot found

Patient 212 mo.—dilatation of the lateral ventricles (11 and 14 mm)Not performedNot performedHypogammaglobulinemia; mild elevation of alpha-fetoprotein (13 IU, reference value up to 5.5 IU).

Patient 3Dilatation of the lateral ventriclesDilatation of the lateral ventriclesNormal Not found

Patient 4Normal10 mo abnormal-mild thinning of the corpus callosum and delayed white matter myelinationIctal activity in the form of slow waves with sharp waves and spikesStrong signal of 2-ketoglutaric acid in urine; elevation of alpha-fetoprotein (13 IU/normal up to 5.5 IU/).

Patient 5Not performedNormalNormal Not found

Patient 6Not performedNormalNormal Decreased concentrations of HVA and 5-HIAA in CSF.Pterine profile in urine—very low concentration of neopterin and biopterin, below the reference range: 0.16 mmol/mol creat (ref. range: 0.3–4.0) and 0.27 mmol/mol creat (ref. range: 0.5–3.0), respectively.Phenylalanine loading test in blood—Phe concentration and Phe to Tyr ratio significantly increased after 1 h, 2h, and 4 h.

Patient 7Not performedT2-hyperintense changes of the periventricular white matter and cerebellar white matter Not performed β-galactocerebrosidase—in two different samples of blood leukocytes revealed 2.1 and 2.0 nmol/mg protein/18 hr, respectively (reference values: 4–9.4 nmol/mg protein/18 hr; in patients with Krabbe disease below 2.0 nmol/mg protein/18 hr).In cultured skin fibroblasts: 3.7 nmol/mg protein/18 hr (reference values 3.9–15.2 nmol/mg protein/18 hr).

HVA: homovanillic acid (dopamine metabolite); 5-HIAA: 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (a serotonin metabolite); Phe: phenylalanine; Tyr: tyrosine.

Genomic DNA was extracted from patients' fresh blood samples. Molecular cytogenetic, PCR, and/or array-based comparative genome hybridization were performed in examined individuals. Array CGH was performed using 180 K microarray: 4 × 180 K from Agilent (Agilent 180 K, 021924). DNA digestion, labeling, and hybridization were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. Scanned images were quantified using Agilent Feature Extraction software (v10.0). The customized web2py software was used for genomic copy-number analysis. All genomic coordinates are based on the NCBI36/hg18 reference genome. For DYT1 mutation, DNA was extracted from whole blood following standard protocols. We used published primers, 6418 and 6419 [7], for PCR amplification across the critical region of the DYT1 gene. PCR products were resolved in a denaturing 6% polyacrylamide gel and visualized by silver staining. Karyotype analysis was performed using peripheral blood lymphocyte cultures and a standard GTG banding method [8]. FISH analysis was performed in phytohemagglutinin-stimulated peripheral blood lymphocytes using standard procedures with LSI SMS (Vysis) probes specific for 17p11.2 Smith-Magenis syndrome critical region. GCH1, GALC, and PSAP sequencing and electrophoresis experiments were done according to standard protocols and manufacturer's instructions on ABI Prism Genetic Analyzer 310 (Applied Biosystems). The results of genetic analysis are presented in Table 4.
Table 4

Results of genetic testing in all enrolled patients. All genomic coordinates are based on the NCBI36/hg18 reference genome.

Patient numberCytogenetic/molecular testsDetected variant (start–end hg18)Size (Mb)Inheritance
1Array CGHarr 16q23.1 (77,445,915–78,190,209) dup0.744–0.827Unknown

2GTG karyotypedel(17)(p11.2)De novo

3Fluorescence in situ hybridizationish del(17)(p11.2p11.2) De novo

4Array CGHarr 5q14.3 (88,121,748–88,232,276) del0.111–0.148 De novo

5 DYT1 PCRc.907_909delGAGDe novo

6 GCH1 sequencingNot found

7 GALC and PSAP sequencing30 kb deletion encompassing exons 11–17 within the GALC gene; mutation in exon 11 (c.1186C>T, p.R396W)

3. Discussion

Genetic testing is the optimal strategy in patients with complex, multisystem disorders in whom a disease cannot be identified despite exhaustive diagnostic efforts. Inherited alterations driving neurodevelopmental disorders are complex, including not only de novo mutations and common, low-risk polymorphisms but also high or moderate risk variants including copy number variation. In the current study we report 7 difficult clinical cases of congenital disorders of the brain diagnosed on the basis of integrative approach including extensive clinical and radiological examination, biochemical analysis, and genetic testing. Enrolled patient belonged to the two groups. First group included children with intellectual disability and the other group consisted of children with neurometabolic disorders. The clinical symptoms of those conditions most frequently appeared in the first years of life. Depending on the affected structure or function, various clinical pictures were present, being the starting point for further diagnostics. Basically routine clinical and laboratory investigations, MRI imaging of the central nervous system, and specialized metabolic testing did not yield a correct diagnosis. Four patients (numbers 1–4) displayed speech and language difficulties of varying degrees. In patient number 1 both expressive and receptive language abilities were impaired to a greater extent than could be expected on the basis of child IQ. Interestingly, no pragmatic disorder has been observed and child successfully communicated using gestures and onomatopoeia. Array CGH revealed presence of microduplication in the region 16q23.1 with the size ranging from 0.744 Mb to 0.827 Mb. The variant has never been described in the literature before. Its parental origin could not be fully traced either; however, copy-number variations in the 16q22-q24 region have been linked to autism and developmental delay phenotypes [9, 10]. The duplication found in Patient 1 affects two dose-sensitive genes: WWOX (OMIM 605131) and MAF (OMIM 177075). Human WW domain-containing oxidoreductase (WWOX, FOR, or WOX1) induces apoptosis, probably via the mitochondrial pathway and is a proapoptotic protein and a tumour suppressor [11]. In rats, it was found that WOX1 plays an essential role in the 1-methyl-4-phenyl-pyridinium induced neuronal death and is present in the condensed nuclei and damaged mitochondria of degenerative neurons in the striatum and cortex, ipsilaterally to intoxication [12]. Protein encoded by the MAF gene (v-maf avian musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene homolog (c-MAF)) is a DNA-binding leucine zipper-containing transcription factor [13, 14]. The expression of transcription factor c-Maf plays an important role in the development of interneurons of laminae III/IV in the dorsal horn of mouse spinal cord, which receive inputs from mechanoreceptive dorsal root ganglion neurons [14]. C-MAF-inducing protein (CMIP) is involved in the c-maf signalling pathway. CMIP interacts with filamin A (plays an important role in the formation of the dendritic spine) and the NF-kappaB subunit RelA (in a mouse model it plays a role in memory formation, cognition, and behaviour; NF-κB signalling pathway is altered in many chronic neurodegenerative diseases in humans). CMIP regulates nonword repetition performance and modulates phonological short-term memory commonly impaired in specific language impairment (SLI) [15]. CMIP was recently recognized as one of the important genes involved in the aetiology of specific language impairment [16]. It is difficult to attribute deep speech and language impairment, which dominates in the clinical picture of this patient, to the duplication of a specific gene, but one should consider the eventuality of the interaction of the c-maf signalling pathway and CMIP. In the course of clinical observation these patients decelerated overall mental development with age (especially deductive reasoning, generalization, anticipation, planning, and construction abilities). Initially, development dynamics were constant but then slowed down or maybe even deteriorated. This could be due to the dysfunction of WWOX, that is, its impact on apoptosis. The significance of this change in our patient is limited by the lack of paternal DNA and detailed clinical data about speech development in the father. The language problems of patient number 2 were further blunted by impaired social development and joint attention. Speech comprehension in this child was relatively good. In patient number 3 speech difficulties were secondary to hearing impairment. Following the implantation of a cochlear implant the patient quickly improved verbal communication skills. In both patients genetic testing allowed to diagnose the Smith-Magenis syndrome (SMS), usually a sporadic disorder characterized by dysmorphic features, hypotonia, developmental delay, speech difficulties, sleep disturbance, and behavioural problems (hyperactivity, aggression, and autoagression) [17]. In both cases a deletion affecting the same genes: the human homologue of the Drosophila flightless-I gene (FLII); cytosolic serine hydroxymethyltransferase (SHMT1); 21,23 the human homologue of Drosophila lethal 2 giant larva (LLGL1); and 18 topoisomerase IIIa (TOP3A), was found confirming the clinical diagnosis of SMS. Nevertheless, the phenotypic differences between both patients cannot be explained only on the basis of the performed genetic tests. Patient number 4 previously described by Nowakowska et al. [18] suffered from very deep speech impairment. The lack of speech and language development was accompanied by deep mental retardation, autistic symptoms, and tremor. Moreover, this patient displayed an atypical movement pattern called mirror movement of the upper limbs, which persisted even in his second/third year of life. Mirror movements (m. m.) are involuntary movements executed by one side of the body during voluntary movements of the contralateral homologous body parts. This is a physiological phenomenon, which normally occurs at the early stage of development [19]. It is clearly visible in the first months of life, but in children older than 6 months it is no longer the dominant pattern and completely disappears by the 10th month. The persistence of this symptom up to 3–5 years can be explained by delayed/abnormal maturation of inhibitory processes in the brain. The overall movement decomposition and wide-based stance and gait were also noted pointing to developmental cerebellar dysfunction. Furthermore, an impact of retarded myelination on the boy's clinical picture cannot be excluded. Genetic testing of this patient revealed a deletion encompassing the first three exons of MEF2C. MEF-2 (Myocyte Enhancer Factor 2) proteins are transcription factors that belong to the MADS (MCM1, Agamous, Deficiens, and serum-response factor) box family of transcription factors. In mammals there are four isoforms MEF-2 A, B, C, and D encoded in four genes; the expression of which overlaps in developing muscle and neural cells during embryogenesis [20]. MEF2C is expressed preferentially in certain neuronal layers of the cortex and that expression declines during postnatal development [21]. MEF2C plays a crucial role in the homeostatic control of activity-dependent synaptogenesis [12]. It is an important process in the establishment of functional neuronal circuits during development and memory storage [22]. Barbosa and coworkers proved that the deletion of the MEF2C transcription factor in mouse brain impairs hippocampal-dependent learning and memory [22]. MEF2C plays an essential role in neurodevelopment by suppressing the number of excitatory synapses during activity-dependent refinement of synaptic connectivity and thus regulating basal and evoked synaptic transmission without affecting synapse structure [22]. A strong dominance of excitation over inhibition observed in the described patient could be related to this mechanism. It is generally recognized that speech and language disorders tend to cluster in families; therefore, a genetic testing is always warranted. The first description of a family with severe speech and language impairments dates back to 1990 [23]. It was related to a mutation within the FOXP2, the first known gene associated with communication disorders. FOXP2 is a member of the forkhead family of transcription factor genes and plays a key role in brain development [24]. A systematic genetic analysis of developmental speech disorders could contribute to defining specific phenotypes of language impairments and facilitate the diagnosis and treatment of such conditions. Genetic studies in this group of children may reveal molecular etiology of speech impairment in a single patient; moreover, the identification of genes linked to language phenotypes and further characterization of normal and aberrant functions of these genes can provide valuable insight into the biological foundations of complex symbolic form of communication that speech and language represent. On the other hand, genetic testing of a subset of genes associated with speech and language development can be screened in children with speech and language disorders in order to guide early and effective therapy. The other examined group consisted of three patients with neurometabolic and movement disorders presenting as various neurological syndromes. The detailed analysis of those patients clearly shows that it is not possible to reach a correct diagnosis of neurometabolic or neurodegenerative disorder in children only on the basis of clinical features, neuroimaging, and electrophysiological examinations. Both detailed biochemical analyses of different body fluids, including CSF, accompanied with genetic testing are crucial to recognize a specific disease entity and to implement appropriate therapy. Patient number 5 presented with a fast progression of dystonia beginning from the trunk muscles while cognitive functions remaining unimpaired. The normal results of urine organic acid analysis by GC/MS and a normal brain MRI allowed excluding organic acidurias (e.g., glutaric aciduria type I) and pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration. The diagnosis of autosomal dominant GTP-cyclohydrolase I (GTPCH I) deficiency was excluded as the early impairment of trunk muscles and a serious deterioration following L-dopa treatment is unusual for those disorders. In this case, PCR-RFLP analysis revealed the presence of characteristic GAG deletion in the DYT1 consistently with the diagnosis of torsion dystonia. The analysis of this case clearly shows that analysis of DYT1 is necessary to confirm or exclude the diagnosis of torsion dystonia. The clinical picture of patient number 6 pointed to l-dopa responsive dystonia without hyperphenylalaninemia, which may occur in autosomal dominant GTPCH I deficiency, sepiapterin reductase (SR) deficiency, or in tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) deficiency. The diagnosis of inherited biogenic amine metabolism disorders (BAD) is almost exclusively based on the quantitative determination of the metabolites in CSF [25]. The characteristic clinical symptoms like diurnal variation and dopa-responsive dystonia, analysis of biogenic amine metabolites in CSF, pterin profile in CSF/urine, and phenylalanine loading test are usually sufficient for diagnosis. Genetic tests are primarily required to distinguish between the two forms of GTPCH (autosomal dominant versus autosomal recessive form). This information is crucial for genetic counselling of the family. One limitation of AD GTPCH I deficiency testing is that molecular analyses in the coding region cannot identify the mutations in this gene in approximately 40% of patients [26]. In some patients a large gene deletion or an intragenic duplication or inversion of the GCH1 gene or abnormalities in noncoding regions of the gene can cause an enzyme deficit. Such cases require the use of other methods, such in next generation sequencing order to recognize intragenic copy-number variation. As in patient number 6 molecular investigation did not detect a pathogenic mutation in the GCH1 gene and genetic examination; without a prior analysis of biogenic amine and pterin metabolites in CSF, it would have failed to identify the cause of the defect. In patient number 7 [27] clinical picture was consistent with Krabbe disease and borderline beta-galactocerebrosidase activity pointed to the impairment in a pathway of galactocerebroside degradation. The high residual activity of beta-galactocerebrosidase was not typical of infantile-onset Krabbe disease and suggested the deficiency of saposin A [28]. The clinical picture and prognosis in both defects does not differ much. The sequencing of the GALC gene revealed two pathogenic variants and the absence of mutations in the PSAP gene, thus confirming the diagnosis of globoid leukodystrophy [27]. Proper molecular diagnostics has enabled genetic counselling and family planning for this family.

4. Closing Remarks

The vast majority of neurometabolic and neurodegenerative diseases belongs to the group of rare diseases (frequency less than 1 : 2000 live births). These sporadic diseases are diagnosed with delay. The availability of new modalities of genetic testing like microarray high-resolution CGH have greatly contributed to the assessment of copy number variation and their role in diverse phenotypes. Moreover, whole genome association studies and exon sequencing in orphan diseases have revealed new candidate genes. In this work, we have taken advantage of array CGH to analyze genomic DNA in patients with the aim to identify potential molecular variants that could be associated with differential clinical outcomes. The proper paediatric and neurological examination together with neuroimaging and biochemistry supplemented with genetic testing was necessary to confirm or rule out the diagnosis. This study also highlights the advantage of an integrated approach to a patient with complicated hereditary disease to establish a proper and prompt diagnosis.
  27 in total

1.  The expression of MEF2 genes is implicated in CNS neuronal differentiation.

Authors:  X Lin; S Shah; R F Bulleit
Journal:  Brain Res Mol Brain Res       Date:  1996-12

2.  A mutation in the saposin A coding region of the prosaposin gene in an infant presenting as Krabbe disease: first report of saposin A deficiency in humans.

Authors:  Ronen Spiegel; Gideon Bach; Vivi Sury; Getu Mengistu; Bela Meidan; Stavit Shalev; Yona Shneor; Hanna Mandel; Marsha Zeigler
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.797

3.  Movement-related cortical potentials in persistent mirror movements.

Authors:  M Mayer; K Bötzel; W Paulus; H Plendl; D Pröckl; A Danek
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-11

Review 4.  Dopa-responsive dystonia: recent advances and remaining issues to be addressed.

Authors:  Y Furukawa; S J Kish
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 10.338

Review 5.  Genetic insights into the functional elements of language.

Authors:  Adam Szalontai; Katalin Csiszar
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  The early-onset torsion dystonia gene (DYT1) encodes an ATP-binding protein.

Authors:  L J Ozelius; J W Hewett; C E Page; S B Bressman; P L Kramer; C Shalish; D de Leon; M F Brin; D Raymond; D P Corey; S Fahn; N J Risch; A J Buckler; J F Gusella; X O Breakefield
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Identification of the transcriptional targets of FOXP2, a gene linked to speech and language, in developing human brain.

Authors:  Elizabeth Spiteri; Genevieve Konopka; Giovanni Coppola; Jamee Bomar; Michael Oldham; Jing Ou; Sonja C Vernes; Simon E Fisher; Bing Ren; Daniel H Geschwind
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Practice parameter: evaluation of the child with global developmental delay: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and The Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society.

Authors:  M Shevell; S Ashwal; D Donley; J Flint; M Gingold; D Hirtz; A Majnemer; M Noetzel; R D Sheth
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2003-02-11       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 9.  Smith-Magenis syndrome.

Authors:  Sarah H Elsea; Santhosh Girirajan
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 4.246

10.  MEF2C, a MADS/MEF2-family transcription factor expressed in a laminar distribution in cerebral cortex.

Authors:  D Leifer; D Krainc; Y T Yu; J McDermott; R E Breitbart; J Heng; R L Neve; B Kosofsky; B Nadal-Ginard; S A Lipton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-02-15       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  5 in total

1.  Rare Inherited and De Novo CNVs Reveal Complex Contributions to ASD Risk in Multiplex Families.

Authors:  Virpi M Leppa; Stephanie N Kravitz; Christa Lese Martin; Joris Andrieux; Cedric Le Caignec; Dominique Martin-Coignard; Christina DyBuncio; Stephan J Sanders; Jennifer K Lowe; Rita M Cantor; Daniel H Geschwind
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Early infantile-onset epileptic encephalopathy 28 due to a homozygous microdeletion involving the WWOX gene in a region of uniparental disomy.

Authors:  Mariska Davids; Thomas Markello; Lynne A Wolfe; Xenia Chepa-Lotrea; Cynthia J Tifft; William A Gahl; May Christine V Malicdan
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2018-11-18       Impact factor: 4.878

Review 3.  Genetic tests in major psychiatric disorders-integrating molecular medicine with clinical psychiatry-why is it so difficult?

Authors:  U Demkow; T Wolańczyk
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 6.222

4.  CMIP is oncogenic in human gastric cancer cells.

Authors:  Jianlin Zhang; Jin Huang; Xingyu Wang; Weidong Chen; Qinqing Tang; Maoyong Fang; Yeben Qian
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.952

5.  CMaf-Inducing Protein Promotes LUAD Proliferation and Metastasis by Activating the MAPK/ERK Pathway.

Authors:  Xiao-Yan Yu; Ming Wang; Juan-Juan Qian
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 2.650

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.