| Literature DB >> 24949276 |
Febri Doni1, Anizan Isahak2, Che Radziah Che Mohd Zain1, Wan Mohtar Wan Yusoff1.
Abstract
Trichoderma spp., a known beneficial fungus is reported to have several mechanisms to enhance plant growth. In this study, the effectiveness of seven isolates of Trichoderma spp. to promote growth and increase physiological performance in rice was evaluated experimentally using completely randomized design under greenhouse condition. This study indicated that all the Trichoderma spp. isolates tested were able to increase several rice physiological processes which include net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, transpiration, internal CO2 concentration and water use efficiency. These Trichoderma spp. isolates were also able to enhance rice growth components including plant height, leaf number, tiller number, root length and root fresh weight. Among the Trichoderma spp. isolates, Trichoderma sp. SL2 inoculated rice plants exhibited greater net photosynthetic rate (8.66 μmolCO2 m(-2) s(-1)), internal CO2 concentration (336.97 ppm), water use efficiency (1.15 μmoCO2/mmoH2O), plant height (70.47 cm), tiller number (12), root length (22.5 cm) and root fresh weight (15.21 g) compared to the plants treated with other Trichoderma isolates tested. We conclude that beneficial fungi can be used as a potential growth promoting agent in rice cultivation.Entities:
Keywords: Growth response; Physiological response; Rice; Trichoderma spp
Year: 2014 PMID: 24949276 PMCID: PMC4052627 DOI: 10.1186/s13568-014-0045-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMB Express ISSN: 2191-0855 Impact factor: 3.298
Comparison of plant height, leaf number, tiller number, root length, root dry weight and root wet weight in different treatments
| 69.23(3.29) | 36(3.46) | 12(1.53) | 21.43(1.440) | 2.68(1.39) | 9.83(1.73) | |
| 70.47(5.66) | 37(4.93) | 12(2.65) | 22.5(1.76) | 4.27(3.33) | 15.21(3.20) | |
| 65.77(1.75) | 24(2.65) | 9(1.15) | 15.43(1.10) | 1.94(1.13) | 8.18(1.68) | |
| 66.47(1.39) | 30(5.20) | 10(1.73) | 17.17(0.65) | 2.74(1.28) | 11.57(0.49) | |
| 66.50(4.30) | 32(2.52) | 13(3) | 17.37(4.58) | 2.74(0.91) | 14.8(0.77) | |
| 68.97(3.54) | 37(2.65) | 11(0) | 21.9(2.71) | 2.2(0.84) | 12.96(3.51) | |
| 67(1.15) | 38(3.79) | 12(1.73) | 21.52(.30) | 2.71(0.46) | 15.01(3.38) | |
| NPK | 28.9(0.72) | 3(0.58) | 1(0) | 9.33(0.91) | 0.62(0.33) | 3.07(0.76) |
| Control | 63.1(0.96) | 28(1) | 8(1.53) | 14.57(3.93) | 1.94(0.37) | 8.51(0.37) |
| LSD0.05 | 55.46 | 33.08 | 13.02 | 9.18 | ns | 9.57 |
ns: Not significant.
Standard deviations are given in parentheses (n = 27).
Comparison of net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, transpiration and internal CO concentration in different treatments
| 8.79(0.010) | 979.08(0.00009) | 358.91(0.037) | |
| 8.66(0.007) | 412.40(0.00070) | 336.97(0.086) | |
| 8.47(0.018) | 1237.88(0.0022) | 363.79(0.046) | |
| 6.88(0.009) | 752.65(0.0024) | 358.60(0.023) | |
| 7.38(0.043) | 499.54(0.0008) | 348.35(0.172) | |
| 8.60(0.012) | 1084.76(0.0014) | 361.75(0.039) | |
| 6.74(0.024) | 712.38(0.0005) | 361.23(0.076) | |
| NPK | 2.09(0.007) | 340.16(0.0004) | 376.69(0.045) |
| Control | 6.21(0.016) | 818.30(0.0002) | 365.74(0.051) |
| LSD0.05 | 0.10 | 0.005 | 3.70 |
Standard deviations are given in parentheses (n = 36).
All means were significantly different between treatments at p < 0.05.
Figure 1Changes in the water use efficiency by the different treatments.
Figure 2The use of SL2 resulted better growth compared to control.
Figure 3Rice plant root inoculated by . SL 2 recorded large mass compared to control.