| Literature DB >> 24949016 |
Sampath Chandra Prasad1, Subbannayya Kotigadde2, Manisha Shekhar3, Nikhil Dinaker Thada1, Prashanth Prabhu1, Tina D' Souza1, Kishore Chandra Prasad1.
Abstract
Objective. To define otomycosis and determine the predisposing factors and microbiology in primary otomycosis. Study Design. Prospective study of two years and review of the literature. Setting. Academic Department of Otolaryngology in a coastal city in India. Patients. 150 immunocompetent individuals of whom 100 consecutive patients with a clinical diagnosis of otomycosis are considered as the study group and 50 consecutive patients with no otomycosis are considered as the control group. Results and Observations. Instillation of coconut oil (42%), use of topical antibiotic eardrops (20%), and compulsive cleaning of external ear with hard objects (32%) appeared to be the main predisposing factors in otomycosis. Aspergilli were the most common isolates (80%) followed by Penicillium (8%), Candida albicans (4%), Rhizopus (1%), and Chrysosporium (1%), the last being reported for the first time in otomycosis. Among aspergilli, A. niger complex (38%) was the most common followed by A. fumigatus complex (27%) and A. flavus complex (15%). Bacterial isolates associated with fungi in otomycosis were S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, and Proteus spp. In 42% of healthy external ears fungi were isolated. Conclusion. Aspergillus spp. were the most common fungi isolated, followed by Penicillium. Otomycotic ears are often associated with bacterial isolates when compared to normal ears. Fungi are also present in a significant number of healthy external auditory canals and their profiles match those in cases of otomycosis. The use of terms "primary" and "secondary" otomycosis is important to standardize reporting.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24949016 PMCID: PMC4052204 DOI: 10.1155/2014/636493
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Microbiol
Demographic profile of the subjects in the study (otomycosis) and control groups.
| Age | Sex | Study group (otomycosis) | Control group |
|---|---|---|---|
| <10 years | Male | 3 | — |
| Female | 1 | — | |
|
| |||
| 11–20 years | Male | 13 | 7 |
| Female | 9 | 3 | |
|
| |||
| 21–30 years | Male | 20 | 12 |
| Female | 12 | 5 | |
|
| |||
| 31–40 years | Male | 12 | 8 |
| Female | 6 | 3 | |
|
| |||
| 41–50 years | Male | 8 | 5 |
| Female | 4 | 2 | |
|
| |||
| 51–60 years | Male | 5 | 3 |
| Female | 3 | 1 | |
|
| |||
| >60 years | Male | 2 | 1 |
| Female | 2 | — | |
|
| |||
| Total | Male |
|
|
| Female |
|
| |
Figure 1Age distribution of subjects in the study (otomycosis) group.
Figure 2Comparison of predisposing factors between the study (otomycosis) and the control groups.
Fungi-bacteria association in study (otomycosis) and control groups.
| Fungal isolates | Study group ( | Control group ( | Study group ( | Control group ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of cases positive for fungi (%) | Number of cases positive for bacteria (%) | Number of cases positive for fungi (%) | Number of cases positive for bacteria (%) | Associated bacterial isolates, number (%) | ||
|
| 38 (38) | 25 (66) | 11 (22) | 5 (13.2) |
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
| 27 (27) | 17 (63) | 2 (4) | 1 (3.7) |
| Corynebacteria 1 (50) |
|
| ||||||
|
| 15 (15) | 9 (60) | 2 (4) | 0 (0) |
| 0 (0) |
|
| ||||||
|
| 8 (8) | 2 (25) | 2 (4) | 0 (0) |
| 0 (0) |
|
| ||||||
|
| 4 (4) | 3 (75) | 3 (6) | 0 (0) |
| 0 (0) |
|
| ||||||
|
| 1 (1) | 1 (100) | 1 (2) | 0 (0) |
| 0 (0) |
|
| ||||||
|
| 1 (1) | 1 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| 0 (0) |
|
| ||||||
| Mixed fungal infections | 6 (6) | 5 (83) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| 0 (0) |
|
| ||||||
| Total |
|
|
|
| ||
Percentage of various fungi in otomycosis as reported by different workers over the last few decades.
| Reports from the Indian subcontinent | Reports from other parts of the world | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Joy et al. [ |
Jain and Agrawal [ | Jaiswal [ | Kaur et al. [ | Pradhan et al. [ |
Viswanatha et al. [ | Present study |
Geaney [ | Yassin et al. [ |
Pontes et al. [ | Yehia et al. [ |
Fasunla et al. [ | Pontes et al. [ | Jia et al. [ | Barati et al. [ |
|
| |||||||||||||||
| Year | 1980 | 1992 | 1990 | 2000 | 2003 | 2012 | 2014 | 1967 | 1978 | 2009 | 1990 | 2008 | 2009 | 2012 | 2011 |
|
| |||||||||||||||
|
| 44.3 | 56.3 | 34 | 36.9 | 25.5 | 56 | 38 | 13.2 | 51.2 | 54.4 | 70.1 | 48.35 | 20 | 54.77 | 41.6 |
|
| 15.7 | 15.6 | — | 41.1 | 6.6 | 18 | 27 | 7.5 | — | 25.1 | 5.6 | 33.96 | 5 | 2.61 | 5.5 |
|
| 23.2 | 4.7 | — | 1.4 | 37.7 | — | 14 | 9.2 | 18.3 | — | 15.6 | 5.43 | 10 | 6.09 | 49 |
|
| |||||||||||||||
| Other aspergilli | — | 3.1 | — | — | 0.9 | — | — | 34.9 | 13.7 | — | — | — | — | 9.57 | 3.7 |
|
| |||||||||||||||
|
| 7.6 | 6.3 | 46 | 13.7 | 10.4 | 16 | 4 | 35.2 | 4.6 | 17 | 7.3 | 12.26 | 55 | 24.35 | 7.6 |
|
| |||||||||||||||
|
| 5.4 | 6.3 | — | 1.4 | — | — | — | — | 2.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
|
| |||||||||||||||
|
| 1.1 | 4.7 | — | 1.4 | — | 10 | 8 | — | 5.3 | 3.5 | — | — | — | — | — |
|
| |||||||||||||||
|
| — | — | 12 | 2.7 | — | — | 1 | — | — | — | 0.6 | — | — | — | — |
|
| |||||||||||||||
|
| — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
|
| |||||||||||||||
| Other fungi/mixed fungi | 2.7 | 3 | 8 | 1.4 | — | — | 6 | — | 4.6 | — | — | — | 10 | 2.61 | 0.9 |
|
| |||||||||||||||
| No growth | — | — | — | — | 18.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |