| Literature DB >> 24949012 |
Sulaiman Mohammed Allazzam1, Sumer Madani Alaki2, Omar Abdel Sadek El Meligy3.
Abstract
Aim. To evaluate the prevalence and possible etiological factors associated with molar incisor hypomineralization (MIH) among a group of children in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Methods. A group of 8-12-year-old children were recruited (n = 267) from the Pediatric Dental Clinics at the Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University. Children had at least one first permanent molar (FPM), erupted or partially erupted. Demographic information, children's medical history, and pregnancy-related data were obtained. The crowns of the FPM and permanent incisors were examined for demarcated opacities, posteruptive breakdown (PEB), atypical restorations, and extracted FPMs. Children were considered to have MIH if one or more FPM with or without involvement of incisors met the diagnostic criteria. Results. MIH showed a prevalence of 8.6%. Demarcated opacities were the most common form. Maxillary central incisors were more affected than mandibular (P = 0.01). The condition was more prevalent in children with history of illnesses during the first four years of life including tonsillitis (P = 0.001), adenoiditis (P = 0.001), asthma (P = 0.001), fever (P = 0.014), and antibiotics intake (P = 0.001). Conclusions. The prevalence of MIH is significantly associated with childhood illnesses during the first four years of life including asthma, adenoid infections, tonsillitis, fever, and antibiotics intake.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24949012 PMCID: PMC4034724 DOI: 10.1155/2014/234508
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Dent ISSN: 1687-8728
Diagnostic criteria used in diagnosing MIH*.
| Demarcated opacity | Posteruptive enamel breakdown (PEB) |
|---|---|
| Alterations in the translucency of the enamel, variable in degree. The defective enamel is of normal thickness with a smooth surface and can be white, yellow, or brown in color. | A defect that indicates deficiency of the surface after eruption of the tooth. Loss of initially formed surface enamel after tooth eruption. The loss is often associated with a preexisting demarcated opacity. |
|
| |
| Atypical restoration. | Extracted molar due to MIH. |
|
| |
| The size and shape of a restoration are not conforming to the temporary caries picture. In most cases in molars there will be restorations extended to the buccal or palatal smooth surfaces. At the border of the restorations frequently an opacity can be noticed. In incisors a buccal restoration can be noticed not related to trauma. | Absence of a first permanent molar should be compared to the other teeth of the dentition. Suspected for extraction due to MIH are opacities or atypical restorations in the other first permanent molars combined with absence of a first permanent molar. Also the absence of first permanent molars in a sound dentition in combination with demarcated opacities on the incisors is suspected for MIH. It is not likely that incisors will be extracted due to MIH. |
*Based on criteria described in the European meeting held in Athens in 2003.
Figure 1Diagnostic criteria of molar incisor hypomineralization. (a) Demarcate opacities (incisors). (b) Posteruptive breakdown (molars). (c) Atypical restorations (molars). (d) Extracted molars.
Sample demographics.
| Variables | MIH | Non-MIH | Total |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | |||||
| Male | 13 (9.7%) | 121 (90.3%) | 134 (50.2%) | 0.404 | 0.525 |
| Female | 10 (7.5%) | 123 (92.5%) | 133 (49.8%) | ||
| Age group (years) | |||||
| 8 | 7 (7.4%) | 88 (92.6%) | 95 (35.6%) | 2.018 | 0.732 |
| 9 | 4 (6.1%) | 62 (93.9%) | 66 (24.7%) | ||
| 10 | 4 (9.5%) | 38 (90.5%) | 42 (15.7%) | ||
| 11 | 4 (12.1%) | 29 (87.9%) | 33 (12.4%) | ||
| 12 | 4 (12.9%) | 27 (87.1%) | 31 (11.6%) | ||
| Nationality | |||||
| Saudi | 14 (9.3%) | 137 (90.7%) | 151 (56.6%) | 0.191 | 0.662 |
| Non-Saudi | 9 (7.8%) | 107 (92.2%) | 116 (43.4%) | ||
| Father's education | |||||
| Graduate education | 4 (19.0%) | 17 (81.1%) | 21 (7.9%) | 3.716 | 0.446 |
| University | 5 (7.0%) | 66 (93.0%) | 71 (26.6%) | ||
| Diploma | 6 (7.7%) | 72 (92.3%) | 78 (29.2%) | ||
| Secondary | 5 (7.0%) | 66 (93.0%) | 66 (26.6%) | ||
| Primary | 3 (11.5%) | 23 (88.5%) | 23 (9.7%) | ||
| Mother's education | |||||
| Graduate education | 1 (10.0%) | 9 (90.0%) | 10 (3.7%) | 1.039 | 0.959 |
| University | 5 (9.3%) | 49 (90.7%) | 54 (20.2%) | ||
| Diploma | 6 (7.0%) | 80 (93.0%) | 86 (32.2%) | ||
| Secondary | 9 (9.7%) | 84 (90.3%) | 93 (34.8%) | ||
| Primary | 2 (10.5%) | 17 (89.5%) | 19 (7.1%) | ||
| No education | 0 (0.0%) | 5 (100.0%) | 5 (1.9%) | ||
| Family income/Saudi Riyals/month | |||||
| Low (<5,000) | 12 (8.0%) | 138 (92.0%) | 150 (56.2%) | 1.033 | 0.597 |
| Medium (5,0000–10,000) | 6 (7.7%) | 72 (92.3%) | 78 (29.2%) | ||
| High (>10,000) | 5 (12.8%) | 34 (87.2%) | 39 (14.6%) |
Prevalence of MIH according to diagnostic criteria.
| MIH defect type | Frequency | Percent |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demarcated opacities | 13 | 56.5 | 14.043 | 0.003* |
| Posteruptive breakdown (PEB) | 6 | 26.1 | ||
| Demarcated Opacities and PEB | 2 | 8.7 | ||
| PEB and atypical restorations | 2 | 8.7 | ||
| Total |
|
|
*P value is significant at 0.05 level.
Prevalence of MIH by type of teeth.
| Number of 1st permanent molar affected | Number of children (%) | Number of children with incisors also affected (%) |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 (21.7%) | 2 (40%) | ||
| 2 | 8 (34.8%) | 4 (50%) | ||
| 3 | 2 (8.7%) | 1 (50%) | 6.689 | 0.082 |
| 4 | 8 (34.8%) | 8 (100%) | ||
| Total |
|
|
Figure 2Prevalence of MIH in maxillary and mandibular permanent index teeth. The prevalence of MIH was higher in maxillary compared to mandibular central incisors (P = 0.01).
Figure 3Prevalence of MIH in each permanent index tooth. Upper central incisors were more affected by MIH than lower central incisors (P = 0.01).
The association between health problems during the first four years of life and prevalence of MIH.
| Variables | MIH | Non-MIH |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adenoiditis | 5 (21.7%) | 6 (2.5%) | 19.780 | <0.001* |
| Fever | 3 (13.0%) | 7 (2.9%) | 6.036 | 0.014* |
| Frequent tonsillitis | 6 (26.1%) | 8 (3.3%) | 22.007 | <0.001* |
| Asthma | 8 (34.8%) | 10 (4.1%) | 31.477 | <0.001* |
| Otitis media | 1 (4.3%) | 2 (0.8%) | 2.355 | 0.125 |
| Frequent antibiotics intake | 5 (21.7%) | 11 (4.5%) | 11.078 | 0.001* |
| Chicken pox | 2 (8.7%) | 5 (2.0%) | 3.637 | 0.057 |
| Measles | 1 (4.3%) | 3 (1.2%) | 1.385 | 0.239 |
| GIT problems | 1 (4.3%) | 5 (2.0%) | 0.506 | 0.477 |
| Jaundice | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (0.8%) | 0.190 | 0.663 |
| Eczema | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (0.4%) | 0.095 | 0.758 |
| Urinary infections | 2 (8.7%) | 6 (2.5%) | 2.813 | 0.145 |
| No disease history | 4 (17.4%) | 199 (81.6%) | 47.486 | <0.001* |
| Total |
|
|
*P value is significant at 0.05 level.
The association between mother's medical history, delivery complications, breast feeding, and prevalence of MIH.
| Variables | MIH ( | Non-MIH |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mother's illness during pregnancy | 3 (13.0%) | 29 (11.9%) | 0.027 | 0.870 |
| Mother's medication intake during pregnancy | 2 (8.7%) | 20 (8.2%) | 0.007 | 0.934 |
| Delivery mode | 20 (87.0%) | 212 (86.9%) | 0.000 | 0.992 |
| Complications during delivery | 1 (4.3%) | 13 (5.3%) | 0.041 | 0.840 |
| Preterm birth | 1 (4.3%) | 11 (4.5%) | 0.001 | 0.972 |
| Low birth weight | 2 (8.7%) | 23 (9.4%) | 0.013 | 0.908 |
| Breast feeding | 21 (91.3%) | 222 (91.0%) | 0.003 | 0.959 |
| Breast feeding duration | ||||
| <10 days | 2 (9.5%) | 21 (9.5%) | 1.000 | |
| 10 days–6 months | 9 (42.9%) | 98 (44.1%) | 0.014 | |
| 6–12 months | 7 (33.3%) | 72 (32.4%) | ||
| >12 months | 3 (14.3%) | 31 (14.0%) | ||
| Mother's medication intake during breast feeding | 2 (9.5%) | 26 (11.7%) | 0.090 | 0.764 |
| Child's positive medical history | 19 (82.6%) | 45 (18.4%) | 47.486 | <0.001* |
*P value is significant at 0.05 level.