| Literature DB >> 24948948 |
Alessandra Smaniotto1, Aline Skovronski1, Elisandra Rigo1, Siu Mui Tsai2, Ademir Durrer2, Lillian Liva Foltran2, Natália Paroul1, Marco Di Luccio3, J Vladimir Oliveira3, Débora de Oliveira3, Helen Treichel4.
Abstract
Lipases produced by a newly isolated Sporidiobolus pararoseus strain have potential catalytic ability for esterification reactions. After production, the enzymatic extracts (conventional crude and precipitated, 'CC' and 'CP', and industrial crude and precipitated, 'IC' e 'IP') were partially characterized. The enzymes presented, in general, higher specificity for short chain alcohols and fatty acids. The precipitated extract showed a good thermal stability, higher than that for crude enzymatic extracts. The 'CC' and 'CP' enzymes presented high activities after exposure to pH 6.5 and 40 °C. On the other hand, the 'IC' and 'IP' extracts kept their activities in a wide range of pH memory but presented preference for higher reaction temperatures. Preliminary studies of application of the crude lipase extract in the enzymatic production of geranyl propionate using geraniol and propionic acid as substrates in solvent-free system led to a reaction conversion of 42 ± 1.5%.Entities:
Keywords: Sporidiobolus pararoseus; enzyme characterization; submerged fermentation; ‘synthetic lipase’
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24948948 PMCID: PMC4059314 DOI: 10.1590/s1517-83822014000100043
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Concentration of lipase extract using ammonium sulfate.
| Extract | Esterification activity (U/glyophilized extract) | Protein content (mg/g lyophilized extract) | Specific esterification activity (U/mgprotein) | Purification factor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional | ||||
| Crude | 127.31 | 0.26 | 489.65 | 1 |
| D40 | 115.69 | 4.12 | 28.07 | 0.06 |
| D60 | 119.31 | 3.76 | 31.74 | 0.06 |
| F20 | 154.57 | 0.26 | 594.5 | 1.21 |
| F40 | 103.10 | 1.03 | 100.09 | 0.20 |
| Industrial | ||||
| Crude | 58.31 | 0.11 | 530.10 | 1 |
| D40 | 86.65 | 2.33 | 37.18 | 0.07 |
| D60 | 77.56 | 3.02 | 25.68 | 0.05 |
| F20 | 120.96 | 0.44 | 274.91 | 0.52 |
| F40 | 95.63 | 2.20 | 43.47 | 0.08 |
D40 and D60 refer to the extract precipitated by direct addition of ammonium sulfate at 40% and 60% of saturation. F20 and F40 refer to the extracts obtained by fractional precipitation in the first and second steps, respectively.
Figure 1Esterification activities (EA) of the crude extracts using oleic (a) and butyric (b) acids as substrates and different alcohols.
Figure 2Lipase activities during incubation at 30 °C. Initial activities: CC = 127.3 U/g, CP = 154.6 U/g, IC = 58.3 U/g, IP = 121.0 U/g.
Figure 3Lipase activities during incubation at 45 °C. Initial activities: CC = 127.3 U/g, CP = 154.6 U/g, IC = 58.3 U/g, IP = 121.0 U/g.
Figure 4Lipase activities during incubation at 60 °C. Initial activities: CC = 127.3 U/g, CP = 154.6 U/g, IC = 58.3 U/g, IP = 121.0 U/g.
Effect of the temperature and pH memory on the crude and precipitated extract: Matrix of the experimental design (coded and real values) and the respective responses in terms of esterification activity for each extract.
| Run | pH | T (°C) | Esterification activity (U/glyophilized extract) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| CC | CP | IC | IP | |||
| 1 | −1(4.0) | −1(20) | 26.87 | 4.65 | 18.42 | 9.09 |
| 2 | +1(9.0) | −1(20) | 22.54 | 4.61 | 32.56 | 0.00 |
| 3 | −1(4.0) | +1(60) | 52.55 | 8.96 | 92.41 | 50.96 |
| 4 | +1(9.0) | +1(60) | 114.51 | 42.47 | 39.92 | 42.80 |
| 5 | 0(6.5) | 0(40) | 143.57 | 64.78 | 32.90 | 8.52 |
| 6 | 0(6.5) | 0(40) | 159.20 | 59.86 | 38.10 | 9.26 |
| 7 | 0(6.5) | 0(40) | 132.44 | 66.66 | 44.21 | 8.44 |
| 8 | 0(6.5) | −1.41(11.8) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0(6.5) | +1.41(68.2) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 85.9 | 48.46 |
| 10 | −1.41(3.0) | 0(40) | 56.62 | 52.54 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 11 | +1.41(10.0) | 0(40) | 7.44 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Empiric models for the esterification activity in function of pH and temperature for each studied extract.
| Extract | Coded model |
|---|---|
| CC | 144.92 − 1.47 |
| CP | 63.75 − 5.09 |
| IC | 153.27 − 12.87 |
| IP | 8.69 − 2.16 |
Analysis of variance for each model presented in Table 3.
| Extract | Sum of squares | Degress of freedom | Mean of squares | F calculated | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CC | Regression | 30,178.05 | 5 | 6,035.61 | 4.24 |
| Residues | 7,113.31 | 5 | 1,422.661 | ||
| Lack of fit | 361.42 | 3 | |||
| Pure Error | 6,751.88 | 2 | |||
| Total | 37,291.36 | 10 | |||
| CP | Regression | 6,768.35 | 5 | 1,353.67 | 3.96 |
| Residues | 1,710.69 | 5 | 342.14 | ||
| Lack of fit | 24.66 | 3 | |||
| Pure Error | 1686.03 | 2 | |||
| Total | 8479.04 | 10 | |||
| IC | Regression | 42,119.73 | 3 | 14,039.91 | 5.73 |
| Residues | 7,356.25 | 3 | 2,452.08 | ||
| Lack of fit | 64.10 | 2 | |||
| Pure Error | 7,292.16 | 1 | |||
| Total | 49,475.98 | 6 | |||
| IP | Regression | 3,788.41 | 5 | 757.68 | 8.70 |
| Residues | 435.61 | 5 | 87.12 | ||
| Lack of fit | 0.41 | 3 | |||
| Pure Error | 435.20 | 2 | |||
| Total | 4,224.01 | 10 |
F5;5; 0.90 = 3.45. F3;3; 0.90 = 5.39.